Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 123-141

  Berninger, Virginia W ^a   Abbott, Robert D ^a   Augsburger, Amy ^a   Garcia, Noelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349472569     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/27740364     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Studies in Writing Series (Series Editor G. Rijlaarsdam). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: a combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In C. Rijlaarsdam (Series editor), M. Torrence, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Volume Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (Studies in Writing, Vol. 20, pp. 13-29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. (Pubitemid 38651979) Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58.
4. Berninger, V. (2006). A developmental approach to learning disabilities. In I. Siegel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. IV, Child psychology and practice (pp. 420-452). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Berninger, V. (2007a). Process Assessment of the Learner-II (PAL II) Diagnostic for Reading and Writing. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
6. Berninger, V. (2007b). Process Assessment of the Learner II user's guide. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt/PsyCorp.
7. Berninger, V. (2008a, February). Relationship between levels of language and transcription mode. Presentation at the Santa Barbara Conference on Writing Research: Writing Research Across Borders, wSanta Barbara, CA.
8. Berninger, V. (2008b, October). Listening to parents of children with learning disabilities: Lessons from the University of Washington Multidisciplinary Learning Disabilities Center. Perspectives on Language and Literacy (pp. 22-30). Presentation at the International Dyslexia Association conference, Seattle, WA.
9. Berninger, V. (2008c). Defining and differentiating dyslexia, dysgraphia, and language learning disability within a working memory model. In E. Silliman & M. Mody (Eds.), Language impairment and reading disability-interactions among brain, behavior, and experience (pp. 103-134). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Berninger, V. (2009). Highlights of programmatic, interdisciplinary research on writing. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 24, 68-79.
11. (Pubitemid 43190556) Berninger, V. Abbott, R., Jones, J., Wolf, B., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M. et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing-, reading-, listening-, and speaking-connections, three letter writing modes, and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 61-92.
12. Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., & Nolen, S. (1995). Integrating low-level skills and high-level skills in treatment protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 293-309.
13. Berninger, V., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 345-363). New York: Guilford.
14. Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique variance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161-196.
15. Berninger, V., & Holdnack, J. (2008). Neuroscientific and clinical perspectives on the RTI initiative in learning disabilities diagnosis and intervention: Response to questions begging answers that see the forest and the trees. In C. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Neuroscientific and clinical perspectives on the RTI initiative in learning disabilities diagnosis and intervention (pp. 66-81). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Berninger, V., Nielsen, K., Abbott, R., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008a). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Underrecognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1-21.
17. Berninger, V., Nielsen, K., Abbott, R., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008b). Gender differences in severity of writing and reading disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 151-172.
18. Berninger, V., Raskind, W., Richards, T., Abbott, R., & Stock, P. (2008). A multidisciplinary approach to understanding developmental dyslexia within working-memory architecture: Genotypes, phenotypes, brain, and instruction. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 707-744.
19. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. New York: Academic Press.
20. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2007, June). From idea generation to idea expression in language by hand in good and poor writers. Invited presentataion at the Psychological Aspects of Education Current Trends Conference, Oxford Brookes University, England.
21. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2008a, February). Brain differences of 5th graders with and without writing disabilities on fMRI handwriting, orthographic coding, and finger succession tasks. Presentation at the conference of the International Neuropsychology Association, Honolulu, HI.
22. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2008b, September). Writing first: Teaching children to write at the beginning of schooling facilitates reading and writing development. Invited presentation at the Agence National de la Recherche, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
23. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2008c, September). The writing brain: fMRI studies of idea generation, handwriting, spelling, sequential finger movements, and working memory in child writers. Invited presentation at the Italian Association of Psychology, Padua, Italy.'
24. Berninger, V., Richards, T., & Abbott, R. (2009). The role of the hand in written idea expression. Proceedings for Writing in All Its States. Invited presentation at the University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
25. Berninger, V., Richards, T., Stock, P., Abbott, R., Trivedi, P., Altemeier, L., & Hayes, J. R. (2009). fMRI activation related to nature of ideas generated and differences between good and poor writers during idea generation. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph, Series II, 6, 77-93.
26. Berninger, V., Rutberg, J., Abbott, R., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A. et al. (2006). Tier 1 and Tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3-30.
27. Berninger, V., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes & Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children's writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28. Berninger, V., Winn, W., Stock, P., Abbott, R., Eschen, K., & Lin, C. et al. (2008). Tier 3 specialized writing instruction for students with dyslexia. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 95-129.
29. Berninger, V., & Wolf, B. (2008, October). Creating the writing revolution. Presentation at the conference of the International Dyslexia Association, Seattle, WA.
30. Berninger, V., & Wolf, B. (2009). Teaching students with dyslexia and dysgraphia: Lessons from teaching and science. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
31. Berninger, V., & Wolf, B. (in press). Helping students with dyslexia and dysgraphia make connections: Differentiated instruction lesson plans in reading and writing. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32. Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., and Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
33. (Pubitemid 24823489) Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production - A workingmemory approach. International Journal Psychology, 29, 591-620.
34. Carlisle, J. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291-322.
35. Chenoweth, N., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80-98.
36. Chenoweth, N., & Hayes, J. R. (2003). The inner voice in writing. Written Communication, 20, 99-118.
37. Christensen, C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographicmotor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well structured written text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (4), 551-565.
38. (Pubitemid 43190560) Connelly, V., Campbell, S., MacLean, M., & Barnes, J. (2006). Contribution of lower order skills to the written composition of college students with and without dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 175-196.
39. Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and written compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479-492.
40. Cronbach, L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
41. Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in writing: Insights from studies in computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159.
42. Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written production. In M. Torrance & G. Jefferey (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing. Processing capacity and working memory effects in text production (pp. 13-23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
43. Fayol, M. (2008, February). Toward a dynamic conception of written production. Presentation at the Santa Barbara Conference on Writing Research: Writing Research Across Borders, Santa Barbara, CA.
44. Fayol, M., Zorman, M., & Lété, B. (2009, in press). Associations and dissociations in reading and spelling French. Unexpecteadly poor and good spellers. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph.
45. Garcia, N. (2007, December). Phonological, orthographic, and morphological contributions to the spelling development of good, average, and poor spellers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
46. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A metaanalysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2, 1-51.
47. Graham, S., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1), 170-182.
48. Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Weintraub, N. (1998). The relationship of handwriting style and speed and legibility. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 290-296.
49. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005). Writing better. Effective strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
50. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Fitzgerald, J. (2007). Best practices in writing instruction. New York: Guilford.
51. Graham, S., Morphy, P., Harris, K., Fink-Chorzempa, B., Saddler, B., Moran, S. et al. (2008b). Teaching spelling in the primary grades: A national survey of instructional practices and adaptations. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 796-825.
52. Graham, S., & D. Perin. (2007a). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools-A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
53. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.
54. Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
55. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore: Brookes.
56. Hayes, J. R. (2008, February). Effects of transcription mode on idea expression in compositions. Presentation at Santa Barbara Conference on Writing Research: Writing Research Across Borders, Santa Barbara, CA.
57. Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (in press). Relationships between idea generation and transcription: How act of writing shapes what children write. In C. Braverman, R. Krut, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of writing research. New York: Routledge.
58. Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23, 135-149.
59. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinbert (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Hooper, S., Knuth, S., Yerby, D., Anderson, K., & Moore, C. (2009). Review of science-supported writing instruction with implementation in mind. In S. Rosenfield & V. Berninger (Eds.), Handbook on implementing evidence based academic interventions (pp. 49-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35 (1, Serial No. 134).
62. Jaffré, J-P., & Fayol, M. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81-104). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
63. (Pubitemid 44511956) James, K., & Gauthier, I. (2006). Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2937-2949.
64. Jones, D. (2004). Automaticity of the transcription process in the production of written text. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Queensland, Australia.
65. (Pubitemid 37025847) Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage, 19, 1492-1500.
66. (Pubitemid 351657337) Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J-C., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B. et al. (2008). Learning through hand-or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 802-815.
67. MacArthur, C. (2006). The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 248-262). New York: Guilford Press.
68. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes (Improving Learning Series). New York: Routledge.
69. Olive, T., Favart, M., Beauvais, C., & Beauvais, L. (in press). Children's cognitive effort in writing: Effects of genre and of handwriting automatisation in 5th-and 9th-graders. Learning & Instruction.
70. Olive, T., Kellogg, R. T., & Piolat, A. (2008). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory demands during text composition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29 (4), 669-687.
71. (Pubitemid 40550713) Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 2005, 324-339.
72. Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
73. Richards, T., Berninger, V., & Fayol, M. (2009). FMRI activation differences between 11-year-old good and poor spellers' access in working memory to temporary and long-term orthographic representations. Journal of Neurolinguistics.
74. Richards, T., Berninger, V., Stock, P., Altemeier, L., Trivedi, P., and Maravilla, K. (2009). FMRI sequential-finger movement activation differentiating good and poor writers. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.
75. Richards, T., Berninger, V., Stock, P., Altemeier, L., Trivedi, P., and Maravilla, K. (2008). Difference between good and poor child writers on fMRI handwriting contrast in brain region associated with orthographic coding. Revised manuscript under review.
76. Stahl, S., & Nagy, W. (2005). Teaching word meaning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. (1996). Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358-385.
78. Troia, G. (Ed.) (2009). Instruction and assessment for struggling writers. Evidence-based practices. New York: Guilford.
79. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
80. Wechsler, D. (2004). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, 4th edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
81. Whitaker, D., Berninger, V., Johnston, J., & Swanson, L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translating process. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 107-130.
82. Wong, B. Y. L. (2001). Pointers for literacy instruction from educational technology and research on writing instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 359-369.
83. Wong, B. Y. L., Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., & Kuperis, S. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise opinion essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 197-212.
84. Wong, B. Y. L., Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., & Kuperis, S. (1997). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise compare-and contrast-essays. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 2-15.
85. Wong, B. Y. L, Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., Kuperis, S., & Corden, M. (1994). Teaching problem learners revision skills and sensitivity to audience through two instructional modes: Student-teacher versus student-student interactive dialogues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 78-90.
86. Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R., Darlington, D., & Jones, W. (1991). Interactive teaching: An effective way to teach revision skills to adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 117-127.
87. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mathers, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement, 3rd Edition (WJ III). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
88. Yates, C., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (1994). Writing problems in intellectually gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 131-155.