Less-invasive approaches to perioperative haemodynamic optimization

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 377-384

  Geisen, Martin ^a   Rhodes, Andrew ^a   Cecconi, Maurizio ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac output; haemodynamic optimization; monitoring; pulse pressure

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; MEDICAL DEVICE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MONITOR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PULMONARY ARTERY; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84863855028     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328355894f     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005; 9:R687-R693.
2. Lees N, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 2009; 13:231.
3. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1392-1402.
4. Gurgel ST, do Nascimento P. Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1384-1391.
5. Cecconi M, Corredor C, Rhodes A. Goal-directed therapy: monitoring, protocolized care and timing. In: Vincent JL, editor. Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine 2012. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012. pp. 368-382.
6. Powell-Tuck J, Gosling P, Lobo DN, et al. British consensus guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy for adult surgical patients (GIFTASUP). London: NHS National Library of Health. 2008. http://www.ics.ac.uk/intensive-care- professional/standards-and-guidelines/british-consensus-guidelines-on- intravenous-fluid-therapy-for-adult-surgical-patients-giftasup-2008 [Accessed 11 May 2012]
7. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988; 94:1176-1186.
8. Wiener RS, Welch HG. Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. JAMA 2007; 298:423-429.
9. Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005; 9:566-572.
10. Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care 2011; 15:214.
11. Hofer CK, Cecconi M, Marx G, della Rocca G. Minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:996-1002.
12. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91.
13. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13:201.
14. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, et al. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1801-1808.
15. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:1180-1192.
16. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care. A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1220-1235.
17. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic evaluation and monitoring in the ICU. Chest 2007; 132:2020-2029.
18. Vincent JL, Pinsky MR, Sprung CL, et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:3093-3096.
19. Wagner CE, Bick JS, Webster BH, et al. Use of a miniaturized transesophageal echocardiographic probe in the intensive care unit for diagnosis and treatment of a hemodynamically unstable patient after aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26:95-97.
20. Thiele RH, Durieux ME. Arterial waveform analysis for the anesthesiologist: past, present, and future concepts. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:766-776.
21. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-h calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:434-440.
22. Oren-Grinberg A. The PiCCO monitor. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 48:57-85.
23. Bendjelid K, Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Michard F. Validation of a new transpulmonary thermodilution system to assess global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water. Crit Care 2010; 14:R209.
24. Cecconi M, Fawcett J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2008; 8:3.
25. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:498-504.
26. Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2009; 13:R32.
27. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14:R18.
28. Cecconi M, Fasano N, Langiano N, et al. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia. Crit Care 2011; 15:R132.
29. Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, et al. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23:401-406.
30. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, et al. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:159-165.
31. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:515-520.
32. Bogert LWJ, van Lieshout JJ. Noninvasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger. Exp Physiol 2005; 90:437-444.
33. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009; 9:6.
34. Bogert LWJ, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from noninvasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:1119-1125.
35. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, et al. A comparison of the Nexfin1 and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:377-383.
36. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:44-51.
37. Roche AM, Miller TE, Gan TJ. Goal-directed fluid management with transoesophageal Doppler. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23:327-334.
38. Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:800-804.
39. Gueret G, Kiss G, Rossignol B, et al. Cardiac output measurements in offpump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23:848-854.
40. Tachibana K, Imanaka H, Takeuchi M, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing is less accurate at settings of reduced minute ventilation and when spontaneous breathing is present. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:830-837.
41. Hofer CK, Buhlmann S, Klaghofer R, et al. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48:653-657.
42. Ball TR, Culp BC, Patel V, et al. Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc 2010; 24:762-766.
43. Gujjar AR, Muralidhar K, Banakal S, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in postcardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method. J Clin Monit Comput 2008; 22:175-180.
44. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1191-1194.
45. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008; 22:113-119.
46. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699.
47. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178.
48. Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, et al. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:748-755.
49. Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:96-103.
50. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122:2080-2086.
51. Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA, et al. The efficacy of functional haemodynamic monitoring parameters in assessing fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78:534-541.
52. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647.
53. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:659-663.
54. Desebbe O, Cannesson M. Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21:772-778.
55. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:910-914.
56. Hood JA, Wilson RJ. Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:1058-1063.