A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients

BMC Anesthesiology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Cecconi, Maurizio ^a   Fawcett, Jayne ^a   Grounds, R Michael ^a   Rhodes, Andrew ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LITHIUM DILUTION TECHNIQUE; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PATIENT MONITORING; PULSE POWER ANALYSIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 41549163951     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712253     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-8-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Della RG Costa MG Coccia C Pompei L Di MP Vilardi V Pietropaoli P Cardiac output monitoring: Aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation Can J Anaesth 2003, 50(7):707-711. 12944446
2. Rodig G Prasser C Keyl C Liebold A Hobbhahn J Continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients Br J Anaesth 1999, 82(4):525-530. 10472216
3. Kurita T Morita K Kato S Kikura M Horie M Ikeda K Comparison of the accuracy of the lithium dilution technique with the thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output Br J Anaesth 1997, 79(6):770-775. 9496211
4. Godje O Hoke K Goetz AE Felbinger TW Reuter DA Reichart B Friedl R Hannekum A Pfeiffer UJ Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability Crit Care Med 2002, 30(1):52-58. 10.1097/ 00003246-200201000-00008 11902287
5. Goedje O Hoeke K Lichtwarck-Aschoff M Faltchauser A Lamm P Reichart B Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: Comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution Crit Care Med 1999, 27(11):2407-2412. 10.1097/ 00003246-199911000-00014 10579256
6. Beaulieu KE Kerr CL McDonell WN Evaluation of a lithium dilution cardiac output technique as a method for measurement of cardiac output in anesthetized cats Am J Vet Res 2005, 66 (9):1639-1645. 10.2460/ ajvr.2005.66.1639 16261840
7. Linton RA Jonas MM Tibby SM Murdoch IA O'Brien TK Linton NW Band DM Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients in a paediatric intensive care unit Intensive Care Med 2000, 26(10):1507-1511. 10.1007/s001340051347 11126264
8. Pittman J Bar-Yosef S SumPing J Sherwood M Mark J Continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse contour analysis: A comparison with lithium indicator dilution cardiac output measurement Crit Care Med 2005, 33(9):2015-2021. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000179021.36805.1F 16148474
9. Hamilton TT Huber LM Jessen ME PulseCO: A less-invasive method to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure after cardiac surgery Ann Thorac Surg 2002, 74(4):S1408-S1412. 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04059-6 12400827
10. Garcia-Rodriguez C Pittman J Cassell CH Sum-Ping J El-Moalem H Young C Mark JB Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: A clinical assessment of central venous and peripheral venous indicator injection Crit Care Med 2002, 30(10):2199-2204. 10.1097/00003246-200210000-00004 12394944
11. Linton RA Young LE Marlin DJ Blissitt KJ Brearley JC Jonas MM O'Brien TK Linton NW Band DM Hollingworth C Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution, thermodilution, and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in anesthetized horses Am J Vet Res 2000, 61(7):731-737. 10.2460/ ajvr.2000.61.731 10895891
12. Bland JM Altman DG Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat Methods Med Res 1999, 8(2):135-160. 10.1191/096228099673819272 10501650
13. Critchley LA Critchley JA A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15(2):85-91. 10.1023/A:1009982611386 12578081
14. Linton NW Linton RA Is comparison of changes in cardiac output, assessed by different methods, better than only comparing cardiac output to the reference method? Br J Anaesth 2002, 89(2):336-337. author reply 337-339 10.1093/bja/aef530 12378677