Conformity on the Internet - The role of task difficulty and gender differences

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1587-1595

  Rosander, Michael ^a   Eriksson, Oskar ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CMC; Conformity; Gender differences; Internet; Social influence; Task difficulty

Indexed keywords

CMC; CONFORMITY; GENDER DIFFERENCES; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TASK DIFFICULTY;

GROUP THEORY; INTERNET;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84863717078     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. V.L. Allen, and J.M. Levine Consensus and conformity Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5 1969 389 399
2. Y. Amichai-Hamburger Internet minimal group paradigm CyberPsychology & Behavior 8 2005 140 142 (Pubitemid 40577490)
3. S.E. Asch Opinions and social pressure Scientific American 193 5 1955 31 35
4. S.E. Asch Studies of independence and conformity. A minority of one against a unanimous majority Psychological Monographs 70 9, whole No. 416 1956 1 70
5. S.E. Asch Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements E.E. Maccoby, T.M. Newcomb, E.L. Hartley, Readings in social psychology 3rd ed. 1958 Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, NY 174 183
6. J.A. Bargh, and K.Y.A. McKenna The internet and social life Annual Review of Psychology 55 2004 573 590
7. R.S. Baron, J.A. Vandello, and B. Brunsman The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 1996 915 927
8. G.S. Berns, J. Chappelow, C.F. Zink, G. Pagnoni, M.E. Martin-Skurski, and J. Richards Neurobiological correlates of social conformity and independence during mental rotation Biological Psychiatry 58 2005 245 253 (Pubitemid 41112274)
9. Le Bon, G. (1896/1995). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Retrieved from: < http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/BonCrow.html >.
10. R. Bond, and P.B. Smith Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task Psychological Bulletin 119 1996 111 137 (Pubitemid 126021388)
11. R.B. Cialdini, and N.J. Goldstein Social influence: Compliance and conformity Annual Review of Psychology 55 2004 591 621
12. M. Cinnirella, and B. Green Does 'cyber-conformity' vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity Computers in Human Behavior 23 2007 2011 2025 (Pubitemid 46176531)
13. R.S. Crutchfield Conformity and character American Psychologist 10 1955 191 198
14. B. David, and J.C. Turner Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology 35 1996 179 199 (Pubitemid 126446039)
15. B. David, and J.C. Turner Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts British Journal of Social Psychology 38 1999 115 134
16. C.K.W. De Dreu, N.K. De Vries, E.H. Gordijn, and M.S. Schuurman Convergent and divergent processing of majority and minority arguments: Effects on focal and related attitudes European Journal of Social Psychology 29 1999 329 348
17. M. Deutsch, and H. Gerard A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51 1955 629 636
18. A. Dino, S. Reysen, and N.R. Branscombe Online interactions between group members who differ in status Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28 2009 85 93
19. V.J. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, and B.N. Sethna The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups Human-Computer Interaction 6 1991 119 146 (Pubitemid 23602922)
20. A.H. Eagly, and L.L. Carli Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies Psychological Bulletin 90 1981 1 20
21. A.H. Eagly, and S.J. Karau Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders Psychological Review 109 2002 573 598
22. A.H. Eagly, W. Wood, and L. Fishbaugh Sex differences in conformity: Surveillance by the group as a determinant of male nonconformity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 1981 384 394
23. L. Festinger, A. Pepitone, and T. Newcomb Some consequences of de-individuation in a group Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47 1952 382 389
24. K.J. Gergen, and R.A. Bauer Interactive effects of self-esteem and task difficulty on social conformity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6 1967 16 22
25. R.E. Guadagno, and R.B. Cialdini Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice 6 2002 38 51 (Pubitemid 34232583)
26. R.E. Guadagno, and R.B. Cialdini Persuade him by email, but see her in person: Online persuasion revisited Computers in Human Behavior 23 2007 999 1015 (Pubitemid 44333225)
27. D.F. Halpern, C.A. Straight, and C.L. Stephenson Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size Sex Roles 64 2011 336 347
28. M.J. Hornsey, L. Majkut, D.J. Terry, and B.M. McKimmie On being loud and proud: Non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms British Journal of Social Psychology 42 2003 319 335 (Pubitemid 37180701)
29. M. Kamata, A. Suzuki, Y. Matsumoto, H. Togashi, and K. Otani Effect of month of birth on personality traits of healthy Japanese European Psychiatry 24 2009 86 90
30. J. Kim I want to be different from others in cyberspace. The role of visual similarity in virtual group identity Computers in Human Behavior 25 2009 88 95
31. J. Kim, and H.S. Park The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory Computers in Human Behavior 27 2011 1223 1230
32. R. Kraut, J. Olson, M. Banaji, A. Bruckman, J. Cohen, and M. Couper Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet American Psychologist 59 2004 105 117 (Pubitemid 38318026)
33. Laporte, L.; van Nimwegen, C.; & Uyttendaele, A. J. (2010). Do people say what they think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social presence. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 305-314). New York, NY: ACM Press.
34. K.S. Larsen, J.S. Triplett, W.D. Brant, and D. Langenberg Collaborator status, subject characteristics, and conformity in the Asch paradigm Journal of Social Psychology 108 1979 259 263
35. E.-J. Lee Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication: Experimental tests of the social identity model of deindividuation effects Human Communication Research 30 2004 234 259 (Pubitemid 39056972)
36. E.-J. Lee When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research 33 2006 423 447 (Pubitemid 44655166)
37. E.-J. Lee, and C. Nass Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication when interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers Human Communication Research 28 2002 349 381 (Pubitemid 37496226)
38. J.M. Levine Solomon Asch's legacy for group research Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 1999 358 364
39. K.Y.A. McKenna, and A.S. Green Virtual group dynamics Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 2002 116 127 (Pubitemid 34232589)
40. T. Micceri The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures Psychological Bulletin 105 1989 156 166
41. R.L. Moreland Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research 41 2010 251 267
42. K. Mori, and M. Arai No need to fake it: Reproduction of the Asch experiment without confederates International Journal of Psychology 45 2010 390 397
43. W.N. Morris, R.S. Miller, and S. Spangenberg The effects of dissenter position and task difficulty on conformity and response conflict Journal of Personality 45 1977 251 266
44. S. Moscovici Toward a theory of conversion behaviour Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13 1980 209 239
45. S. Moscovici, and B. Personnaz Studies in social influence. V. Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16 1980 270 282
46. P.R. Nail, G. MacDonald, and D.A. Levy Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response Psychological Bulletin 126 2000 454 470
47. B.A. Nosek, M.R. Banaji, and A.G. Greenwald E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet Journal of Social Issues 58 2002 161 176
48. T. Postmes, and R. Spears Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 2002 1073 1083 (Pubitemid 41309668)
49. T. Postmes, R. Spears, and M. Lea The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication Human Communication Research 26 2000 341 371
50. T. Postmes, R. Spears, K. Sakhel, and D. de Groth Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 27 2001 1243 1254
51. PTS (Swedish Post and Telecom Agency), (2010). Svenskarnas användning av telefoni & Internet 2010: Individundersökning 2010 [Swedes' use of telephony & Internet 2010: Population Survey 2010]. Retrieved from: < http://www.pts.se/upload/Rapporter/Tele/2010/2010-25- individundersokning-2010.pdf >.
52. S. Reicher, R. Spears, and T. Postmes A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena European Review of Social Psychology 6 1995 161 198
53. M.B. Reysen The effects of social pressure on group recall Memory & Cognition 31 2003 1163 1168 (Pubitemid 38270529)
54. P. Rogers, and M. Lea Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity Behaviour & Information Technology 24 2005 151 158 (Pubitemid 41657369)
55. M. Smilowitz, C.D. Compton, and L. Flint The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment Computers in Human Behavior 4 1988 311 321
56. R. Spears, and M. Lea Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication M. Lea, Contexts of computer-mediated communication 1992 Harvester-Wheatsheaf New York, NY 30 65
57. R. Spears, T. Postmes, M. Lea, and A. Wolbert When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication Journal of Social Issues 58 2002 91 107 (Pubitemid 34268220)
58. D.J. Stang Ineffective deception in conformity research: Some causes and consequences European Journal of Social Psychology 6 1976 353 367
59. SCB (Statistiska centralbyrån), (2011). Preliminär befolkningsstatistik per månad 2008-2011 [Preliminary population statistics per month from 2008 to 2011]. Retrieved from: < http://www.scb.se/Pages/TableAndChart-25896.aspx >.
60. H. Tajfel, M.G. Billig, R.P. Bundy, and C. Flament Social categorization and intergroup behaviour European Journal of Social Psychology 1 1971 149 178
61. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), (2009). Human development report. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. Retrieved from: .
62. K. Williams, C. Cheung, and W. Choi Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 2000 748 762
63. P. Zimbardo The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil 2007 Random House New York
64. P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos W.J. Arnold, D. Levine, 1969 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1970 University of Nebraska Press Lincoln, NE 237 307