Online interactions between group members who differ in status

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 85-93

  Dino, Amanda ^a   Reysen, Stephen ^a   Branscombe, Nyla R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformity; Fans; Internet; Intragroup status; Peripheral; Prototypical; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 59549086798     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X08325916     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753.
2. Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343-388). New York: Psychology Press.
3. Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4. Griffith, M., & Fox, S. (2007, September). Hobbyists online. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/221/report- display.asp
5. Hains, S.C., Hogg, M.A., & Duck, J.M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100.
6. Harris Interactive. (2007, November). Poll #108. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://www.harris-interactive.com/harris-poll/index.asp?PID=827
7. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B.M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.
8. Jetten, J., Hornsey, M.J., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (2006). When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 162-173.
9. Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V., & Barker (1999). Strategies of accommodation: Development of a coding system for conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 123-152.
10. Louis, M.R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
11. McKenna, K.Y.A., & Green, A.S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 116-127.
12. Moreland, R.L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of new group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1190.
13. Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., & Richards, J.M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
14. Noel, J.G., Wann, D.L., & Branscombe, N.R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.
15. Oakes, P., Haslam, S.A., & Turner, J.C. (1999). The role of prototypicality in group influence and cohesion: Contexual variation in the graded structure of social categories. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Paez, & J.-C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 75-92). London: Sage.
16. Pennebaker, J.W., & Davis, M. (2006). [Pronoun use and dominance]. Unpublished data.
17. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., & Booth, R.J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Ridings, C.M., & Gefen, D. (2004, November). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, Article 4. Retrieved March 21, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/ridings-gefen.html
19. Street, R.L. (1991). Accommodation in medical consultation. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 131-156). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Thakerar, J.N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205-256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. New York: Psychology Press.
22. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
23. van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. (1994). Ingroup prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289-300.
24. Vonk, R. (1998). The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior towards superiors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 849-864.
25. Williams, K.D., Cheung, C.K.T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.