Mechanical regulation of cellular phenotype: Implications for vascular tissue regeneration

Cardiovascular Research

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 215-222

  Liu, Wendy F ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Mechanotransduction; Micropatterning; Rigidity; Stem cells; Vascular smooth muscle

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MICROENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULAR TISSUE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; PHENOTYPE; REGENERATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84863696767     PISSN: 00086363     EISSN: 17553245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvs168     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Langer RS, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering: the challenges ahead. Sci Am 1999;280: 86-89.
2. Bashur CA, Venkataraman L, Ramamurthi A. Tissue engineering and regenerative strategies to replicate biocomplexity of vascular elastic matrix assembly. Tissue Eng B: Rev 2011;28:203-217.
3. Niklason LE, Gao J, Abbott WM, Hirschi KK, Houser S, Marini R et al. Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 1999;284:489-493. (Pubitemid 29289622)
4. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5:17-26.
5. Polak JM, Bishop AE. Stem cells and tissue engineering: past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1068:352-366. (Pubitemid 43824168)
6. Bajpai VK, Andreadis ST. Stem cell sources for vascular tissue engineering and regeneration. Tissue Eng 2012. Published online ahead of print.
7. Takahashi K. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663-676. (Pubitemid 44233629)
8. Adamo L, Naveiras O, Wenzel PL, McKinney-Freeman S, Mack PJ, Gracia-Sancho J et al. Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature 2009;459: 1131-1135.
9. Lucitti JL, Jones EAV, Huang C, Chen J, Fraser SE, Dickinson ME. Vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac requires hemodynamic force. Development 2007;134: 3317-3326. (Pubitemid 350018432)
10. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995;75: 519-560.
11. Yamamoto K, Sokabe T, Watabe T, Miyazono K, Yamashita JK, Obi S et al. Fluid shear stress induces differentiation of Flk-1-positive embryonic stem cells into vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H1915-H1924. (Pubitemid 40418021)
12. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:63-73.
13. Hahn C, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:53-62.
14. Huynh J, Nishimura N, Rana K, Peloquin JM, Califano JP, Montague CR et al. Age-related intimal stiffening enhances endothelial permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:112ra122.
15. Shyy Y, Hsieh H, Usami S, Chien S. Fluid shear stress induces a biphasic response of human monocyte chemotactic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:4678-4682. (Pubitemid 24177712)
16. Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM, Gray DS, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:1484-1489. (Pubitemid 36254472)
17. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 2002;159:695-705.
18. Dembo M, Wang YL. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J 1999;76:2307-2316. (Pubitemid 29266384)
19. Alenghat FJ, Fabry B, Tsai KY, Goldmann WH, Ingber DE. Analysis of cell mechanics in single vinculin-deficient cells using a magnetic tweezer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;277:93-99.
20. Matthews BD, Overby DR, Alenghat FJ, Karavitis J, Numaguchi Y, Allen PG et al. Mechanical properties of individual focal adhesions probed with a magnetic microneedle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;313:758-764. (Pubitemid 38021895)
21. Hsiai TK, Wu JC. Hemodynamic forces regulate embryonic stem cell commitment to vascular progenitors. Curr Cardiol Rev 2008;4:269-274.
22. Folkman J, Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978;273: 345-349. (Pubitemid 8344174)
23. Roman J, McDonald JA. Expression of fibronectin, the integrin alpha 5, and alpha-smooth muscle actin in heart and lung development. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992;6:472-480.
24. Yang Y, Relan NK, Przywara DA, Schuger L. Embryonic mesenchymal cells share the potential for smooth muscle differentiation: myogenesis is controlled by the cell's shape. Development 1999;126:3027-3033. (Pubitemid 29355694)
25. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143-147. (Pubitemid 29282067)
26. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004;6:483-495. (Pubitemid 38456178)
27. Harris AK, Wild P, Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science 1980;208:177-179. (Pubitemid 10072133)
28. Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Ladoux B. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:8281-8286. (Pubitemid 47175479)
29. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:4872-4877.
30. Peng R, Yao X, Ding J. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2011;32:8048-8057.
31. Alford PW, Nesmith AP, Seywerd JN, Grosberg A, Parker KK. Vascular smooth muscle contractility depends on cell shape. Integr Biol 2011;3:1063-1070.
32. Isenberg BC, Backman DE, Kinahan ME, Jesudason R, Suki B, Stone PJ et al. Micropatterned cell sheets with defined cell and extracellular matrix orientation exhibit anisotropic mechanical properties. J Biomech 2012;45:756-761.
33. Thakar RG, Cheng Q, Patel S, Chu J, Nasir M, Liepmann D et al. Cell-shape regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation. Biophys J 2009;96:3423-3432.
34. Li X, Chu J, Wang A, Zhu Y, Chu WK, Yang L et al. Uniaxial mechanical strain modulates the differentiation of neural crest stem cells into smooth muscle lineage on micropatterned surfaces. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e26029.
35. Pelham RJ, Wang YL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:13661-13665.
36. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-689. (Pubitemid 44233625)
37. Flanagan LA, Ju Y-E, Marg B, Osterfield M, Janmey PA. Neurite branching on deformable substrates. Neuroreport 2002;13:2411-2415. (Pubitemid 36143534)
38. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bönnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 2004;166:877-887. (Pubitemid 39249838)
39. Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, Shvartsman D, Ali OA, Bencherif SA et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2010;9:518-526.
40. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2001;153:1175-1186.
41. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 1997;88:39-48. (Pubitemid 27180329)
42. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KEG, Sacco A, Leonardi NA, Kraft P et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 2010;329:1078-1081.
43. Chowdhury F, Na S, Li D, Poh Y-C, Tanaka TS, Wang F et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat Mater 2010;9:82-88.
44. Holst J, Watson S, Lord MS, Eamegdool SS, Bax DV, Nivison-Smith LB et al. Substrate elasticity provides mechanical signals for the expansion of hemopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:1123-1128.
45. Peyton SR, Kim PD, Ghajar CM, Seliktar D, Putnam AJ. The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. Biomaterials 2008;29:2597-2607.
46. Liu Y, Chan-Park MB. A biomimetic hydrogel based on methacrylated dextran-graft-lysine and gelatin for 3D smooth muscle cell culture. Biomaterials 2010;31:1158-1170.
47. Brown XQ, Bartolak-Suki E, Williams C, Walker ML, Weaver VM, Wong JY. Effect of substrate stiffness and PDGF on the behavior of vascular smooth muscle cells: Implications for atherosclerosis. J Cell Physiol 2010;225:115-122.
48. Christensen AP, Corey DP. TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation? Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:510-521. (Pubitemid 46985360)
49. Tarbell JM, Ebong EE. The endothelial glycocalyx: a mechano-sensor and-transducer. Sci Signal 2008;1:pt8.
50. Tschumperlin DJ, Dai G, Maly IV, Kikuchi T, Laiho LH, McVittie AK et al. Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space. Nature 2004;429:83-86. (Pubitemid 38620555)
51. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:21-33.
52. Parsons JT, Horwitz AR, Schwartz MA. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:633-643.
53. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 2002;110: 673-687. (Pubitemid 35283958)
54. Puklin-Faucher E, Sheetz MP. The mechanical integrin cycle. J Cell Sci 2009;122(Pt 2): 179-186.
55. Brown MC, Turner CE. Paxillin: adapting to change. Physiol Rev 2004;84:1315-1339. (Pubitemid 39287952)
56. Parsons JT. Focal adhesion kinase: the first ten years. J Cell Sci 2003;116(Pt 8): 1409-1416. (Pubitemid 36527488)
57. Discher DE, Janmey P,Wang Y-L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005;310:1139-1143. (Pubitemid 41681732)
58. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001;294:1708-1712. (Pubitemid 33104840)
59. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 2002;420:629-635. (Pubitemid 36764489)
60. Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, Wataya T et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:681-686. (Pubitemid 46897207)
61. Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:75-82.
62. Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, Rattner JB, Shanahan C, Burke B et al. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 2006;172:41-53. (Pubitemid 43042628)
63. Dechat T, Pfleghaar K, Sengupta K, Shimi T, Shumaker DK, Solimando L et al. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev 2008;22:832-853. (Pubitemid 351482836)
64. Gieni RS, Hendzel MJ. Mechanotransduction from the ECM to the genome: are the pieces now in place? J Cell Biochem 2008;104:1964-1987.
65. McNamara LE, Burchmore R, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Biggs MJP, Wilkinson CDW et al. The role of microtopography in cellular mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 2012;33: 2835-2847.
66. Versaevel M, Grevesse T, Gabriele S. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat Comms 2012;3:671.
67. Li Y, Chu JS, Kurpinski K, Li X, Bautista DM, Yang L et al. Biophysical regulation of histone acetylation in mesenchymal stem cells. Biophys J 2011;100:1902-1909.
68. Hinde E, Cardarelli F, Digman MA, Gratton E. In vivo pair correlation analysis of EGFP intranuclear diffusion reveals DNA-dependent molecular flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:16560-16565.
69. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011;474:179-183.
70. Wada K-I, Itoga K, Okano T, Yonemura S, Sasaki H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development 2011;138:3907-3914.
71. Xie C, Guo Y, Zhu T, Zhang J, Ma PX, Chen YE. Yap1 protein regulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switch by interaction with myocardin. J Biol Chem 2012;287:14598-14605.
72. Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Hsin HY, Ingber DE. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 2010;328:1662-1668.
73. Eyckmans J, Boudou T, Yu X, Chen CS. A Hitchhiker's guide to mechanobiology. Dev Cell 2011;21:35-47.