The Recognition Signal Hypothesis for the Adaptive Evolution of Religion: A Phylogenetic Test with Christian Denominations

Human Nature

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 218-249

  Matthews, Luke J ^a  

^a Activate Networks Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Christianity; Cognitive science of religion; Cooperation; Cultural phylogeny; Cultural transmission

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; RELIGION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHRISTIANITY; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84863334206     PISSN: 10456767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9138-8     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Arbuthnott, D., Elliot, M. G., Mcpeek, M. A., & Crespi, B. J. (2010). Divergent patterns of diversification in courtship and genitalic characters of Timema walking-sticks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(7), 1399-1411.
2. Atkinson, Q. D., & Gray, R. D. (2006). Are accurate dates an intractable problem for historical linguistics? In C. P. Lipo, M. J. O'Brien, M. Collard, & S. Shennan (Eds.), Mapping our ancestors (pp. 269-296). New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
3. Atkinson, Q. D., Meade, A., Venditti, C., Greenhill, S. J., & Pagel, M. (2008). Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science, 319, 588.
4. Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes: inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature, 12, 351-381.
5. Barret, J. L. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: what is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1, 1-19.
6. Barret, J. (2009). Cognitive science, religion, and theology. In J. Schloss & M. J. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion (pp. 76-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Berman, E. (2009). Radical, religious, and violent: The new economics of terrorism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
8. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9. Boyer, P. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 119-124.
10. Brashears, M. E. (2010). Anomia and the sacred canopy: testing a network theory. Social Networks, 32(3), 187-196.
11. Brenner, P. S. (2011). Exceptional behavior or exceptional identity? Overreporting of church attendance in the U. S. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 19-41.
12. Buchan, J. C., Alberts, S. C., Silk, J. B., & Altmann, J. (2003). True paternal care in a multi-male primate society. Nature, 425, 179-181.
13. Bulbulia, J. (2008). Meme infection or religious niche construction? An adaptationist alternative to the cultural maladaptationist hypothesis. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 67-107.
14. Bulbulia, J. (2009). Religiosity as mental time-travel: cognitive adaptations for religious behavior. In J. Schloss & M. J. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion (pp. 44-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Cardoso, G. C., & Mota, P. G. (2008). Speciational evolution of coloration in the genus Carduelis. Evolution, 62, 753-762.
16. Carson, T., & J. Cerrito (Eds.) (2003). New Catholic Encyclopedia. 2nd edn. Detroit: Gale, Gale Virtual Reference Library. http://www. gale. cengage. com/servlet/ItemDetailServlet?region=9& imprint=000& titleCode=NCE& type=1& id=113827& cf=p.
17. Cheetham, S. A., Thom, M. D., Jury, F., Oilier, W. E. R., Beynon, R. J., & Hurst, J. L. (2007). The genetic basis of individual-recognition signals in the mouse. Current Biology, 17, 1771-1777.
18. Collard, M., Shennan, S. J., & Tehrani, J. J. (2006). Branching, blending, and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 169-184.
19. Colucci, E., & Martin, G. (2008). Religion and spirituality along the suicidal path. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 38(2), 229-244.
20. Coop, G., Witonsky, D., Di Rienzo, A., & Pritchard, J. K. (2010). Using environmental correlations to identify loci underlying local adaptation. Genetics, 185(4), 1411-1423.
21. Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: some thoughts and clarifications. Social Science Information, 44, 603-620.
22. Cross, F. L., & E. A. Livingstone (Eds.) (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. www.oxford-christianchurch.com.
23. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Ellison, C. G., Burr, J. A., & McCall, P. L. (1997). Religious homogeneity and metropolitan suicide rates. Social Forces, 76(1), 273-299.
25. Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
26. Franz, M., & Matthews, L. J. (2010). Social enhancement can create adaptive, arbitrary and maladaptive cultural traditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1698), 3363.
27. Freckleton, R. P., Phillimore, A. B., & Pagel, M. (2008). Relating traits to diversification: a simple test. The American Naturalist, 172, 102-115.
28. Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2010). Greenbeards. Evolution, 64(1), 25-38.
29. Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2000). Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. The American Naturalist, 155, 346-364.
30. Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27, 857-871.
31. Grafen, A. (1990). Do animals really recognize kin? Animal Behaviour, 39, 42-54.
32. Greenhill, S. J., Currie, T. E., & Gray, R. D. (2009). Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276(1665), 2299-2306.
33. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.
34. Hamilton, W. D. (1975). Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In R. Fox (Ed.), Biosocial anthropology (pp. 133-155). New York: Wiley.
35. Hancock, A. M., Witonsky, D. B., Ehler, E., Alkorta-Aranburu, G., Beall, C., Gebremedhin, A., et al. (2010). Human adaptations to diet, subsistence, and ecoregion are due to subtle shifts in allele frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 8924-8930.
36. Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(1), 3-35.
37. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 79-89.
38. Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2010). The evolution of cultural adaptations: Fijian food taboos protect against dangerous marine toxins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 3715-3724.
39. Hillerbrand, H. J. (Ed.) (2005). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. www.oxford-reformation.com.
40. Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001). MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17, 754-755.
41. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1465-1496.
42. Iannaccone, L. R., & Berman, E. (2006). Religious extremism: the good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice, 128, 109-129.
43. Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. Evolution and the capacity for commitment, 292-309.
44. Jansen, V. A. A., & van Baalen, M. (2006). Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Nature, 440(7084), 663-666.
45. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.
46. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
47. Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2006). Religion in a free market: Religious and non-religious americans, who, what, why, where. Ithaca: Paramount Market Publishing, Inc.
48. Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2009). American religious identification survey (ARIS 2008), summary report. Hartford: Trinity College.
49. Kosmin, B. A., Mayer, E., & Keysar, A. (2001). American religious identification survey, 2001. New York: The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
50. Lee, D. C., & Bryant, H. N. (1999). A reconsideration of the coding of inapplicable characters: assumptions and problems. Cladistics, 15, 373-378.
51. Lewis, P. O. (2001). A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology, 50, 913-925.
52. Mace, R., & Pagel, M. (1997). Tips, branches and nodes: Seeking adaptation through comparative studies. In L. Betzig (Ed.), Human nature (pp. 297-310). New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Matthews, L. J. (2011). Variations in sexual behavior among capuchin monkeys function for conspecific mate recognition: a phylogenetic analysis and a new hypothesis for female proceptivity in tufted capuchins. American Journal of Primatology, 74(4), 287-298.
54. Matthews, L. J., & Butler, P. M. (2011). Novelty-seeking DRD4 polymorphisms are associated with human migration distance out-of-Africa after controlling for neutral population gene structure. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 145(3), 382-389.
55. Matthews, L. J., Paukner, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2010). Can traditions emerge from the interaction of stimulus enhancement and reinforcement learning? An experimental model. American Anthropologist, 112(2), 257-269.
56. Matthews, L. J., Tehrani, J. J., Jordan, F. M., Collard, M., & Nunn, C. L. (2011). Testing for divergent transmission histories among cultural characters: a study using Bayesian phylogenetic methods and Iranian tribal textile data. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e14810. Available at http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014810.
57. Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44, 122-129.
59. McPeek, M. A., Shen, L., Torrey, J. Z., & Farid, H. (2008). The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. American Naturalist, 171(5), E158-E178.
60. Meyer, J. (2001). Age: 2000; Census 2000 brief. U. S. Census Bureau, C2KBR/01-12. www. census.gov.
61. Moore, J. H. (1994). Putting anthropology back together again: the ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory. American Anthropologist, 96, 925-948.
62. New American Bible. (2002). United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Accessed online at http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_INDEX.HTM#fonte.
63. Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560-1563.
64. Nunn, C. L., Thrall, P. H., & Boesch, C. (2009). Do transmission mechanisms or social systems drive cultural dynamics in socially structured populations? Animal Behaviour, 77, 1515-1524.
65. Nunn, C. L., Arnold, C., Matthews, L., & Mulder, M. B. (2010). Simulating trait evolution for cross-cultural comparison. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 365(1559), 3807-3819.
66. Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature, 441, 502-505.
67. Pagel, M. (1999). Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401, 877-884.
68. Pagel, M., & Meade, A. (2006). Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. American Naturalist, 167, 808-825.
69. Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004). APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20, 289-290.
70. Pew Hispanic Center. (2007). Pew Hispanic Center tabulations of 2007 American Community Survey (Table 6. Population, by Nativity, Race and Ethnicity: 2007).
71. Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.
72. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., &the R Core team (2009). Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3. 1-96.
73. Porter, C. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). How marginal are forager habitats? Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(1), 59-68.
74. Purzycki, B., & Sosis, R. (2010). Religious concepts as necessary components of the adaptive religious system. In U. Frey (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on philosophy: Evolution and religion (pp. 37-59). Marburg: Tectum Verlag.
75. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
76. Riolo, R. L., Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R. (2001). Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature, 414(6862), 441-443.
77. Roberts, G., & Sherratt, T. N. (2002). Behavioural evolution-does similarity breed cooperation? Nature, 418(6897), 499-500.
78. Rohlf, F. J. (2006). A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution, 60, 1509-1515.
79. Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572-1574.
80. Ruffle, B., & Sosis, R. (2007). Does it pay to pray? Costly ritual and cooperation. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(1), 1-37.
81. Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The evolution of ethics. In J. E. Huchinson (Ed.), Religion and the natural sciences. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
82. Sober, E. S., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
83. Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
84. Soler, M. (2008a). Commitment costs and cooperation: evidence from Candomblé, and Afro-Brazilian religion. In J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, & critiques (pp. 167-174). Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.
85. Soler, M. (2008b). The faith of sacrifice: commitment and cooperation in Candomblé, and Afro-Brazilian religion. Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers University.
86. Sosis, R. (2005). Does religion promote trust? The role of signaling, reputation, and punishment. Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion, 1(7), 1-30.
87. Sosis, R. (2006). Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the evolution of religion. In R. Emmons & P. McNamara (Eds.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion: Volume I: Evolution, genes, and the religious brain (pp. 61-86). Westport: Praeger Perspectives.
88. Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9(3), 315-332.
89. Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(2), 211.
90. Sosis, R., & Handwerker, W. P. (2011). Psalms and coping with uncertainty: religious Israeli women's responses to the 2006 Lebanon war. American Anthropologist, 113(1), 40-55.
91. Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44, 713-741.
92. Stark, R., Doyle, D. P., & Rushing, J. L. (1983). Beyond Durkheim: religion and suicide. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22(2), 120-131.
93. Traulsen, A., & Schuster, H. G. (2003). Minimal model for tag-based cooperation. Physical Review E, 68.
94. Uy, J. A. C., Moyle, R. G., & Filardi, C. E. (2009). Plumage and song differences mediate species recognition between incipient flycatcher species of the Solomon Islands. Evolution, 63(1), 153-164.
95. Venditti, C., Meade, A., & Pagel, M. (2006). Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 55, 637-643.
96. Weingarten, C. P., Chisholm, J. S., Bering, J., Bulbulia, J., Krueger, F., King, B. J., et al. (2009). Attachment and cooperation in religious groups: an example of a mechanism for cultural group selection. Discussion. Authors' reply. Current Anthropology, 50(6), 759-785.
97. Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin's cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Wilson, D. S. (2005). Testing major evolutionary hypotheses about religion with a random sample. Human Nature, 16, 382-409.
99. Wilson, D., & Wilson, E. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327-348.
100. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
101. Zuk, M. (1992). The role of parasites in sexual selection: current evidence and future directions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 39-68.