A reconsideration of the coding of inapplicable characters: Assumptions and problems

Cladistics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 373-378

  Lee, Dong Chan ^a   Bryant, Harold N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ROYAL SASKATCHEWAN MUSEUM   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0033498126     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.1999.0116     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Colless D. H. On "character" and related terms. Syst. Zool. 34:1985;229-233.
2. de Pinna M. C. C. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics. 7:1991;367-394.
3. Hawkins J. A., Hughes C. E., Scotland R. W. Primary homology assessment, characters and character states. Cladistics. 13:1997;275-283.
4. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics. 1966;Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.
5. Maddison W. P. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;576-581.
6. Patterson C. Morphological characters and homology. Joysey K. A., Friday A. E. Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. 1982;21-74 Academic Press, London and New York.
7. Pimentel R. A., Riggins R. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics. 3:1987;201-209.
8. Platnick N. I., Griswold C. E., Coddington J. A. On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics. 7:1991;337-343.
9. Pleijel F. On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics. 11:1995;309-315.
10. Swofford D. L. PAUP - Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, ver. 3.1. 1993;Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.