Divergent patterns of diversification in courtship and genitalic characters of Timema walking-sticks

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1399-1411

  Arbuthnott, D ^a   Elliot, M G ^a   McPeek, M A ^b   Crespi, B J ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Courtship evolution; Genitalia; Phylogenetics; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; COURTSHIP; DIVERGENCE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; INSECT; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

PHASMATODEA; TIMEMA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENITALIA, MALE; INSECTS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77954164294     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02000.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abouheif E. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1999, 1:895-909.
2. Alexander RD, Marshall DC, Cooley JR. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids 1997, 4-31. Choe JC, Crespi BJ, eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
3. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Arbuthnott D, Crespi BJ. Courtship and mate discrimination within and between species of Timema walking-sticks. Anim. Behav. 2009, 78:53-59.
5. Arnqvist G. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 60:365-379.
6. Arnqvist G. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 1998, 393:784-786.
7. Arnqvist G, Thornhill R. Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. 1998, 71:193-212.
8. Blows MW, Allan RA. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 1998, 152:826-837.
9. Boake CRB, Hoikkala A. Courtship behaviour and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila-silvestris males. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49:1303-1313.
10. Butlin RK. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Speciation and Its Consequences 1989, 158-179. Otte DEndler JA. eds, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
11. Butlin RK, Ritchie MG. Behaviour and speciation. Behaviour and Evolution 1994, 43-79. Slater PJB, Slater TR. eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
12. Cameron SL, Barker SC, Whiting MF. Mitochondrial genomics and the new insect order Mantophasmatodea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38:274-279.
13. Cardoso GC, Mota PG. Speciational evolution of coloration in the genus Carduelis. Evolution 2008, 62:753-762.
14. Coyne JA, Orr AH. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates Publishers, Sunderland, MA
15. Eberhard WG. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia 1985, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Eberhard WG. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice in insects and arachnids. The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids 1997, 32-57. Choe JCCrespi BJ. eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
17. Eberhard WG. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 2004, 58:1947-1970.
18. Fincke OM. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly Enellagma hageri (Walsh) (Odanata, Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1982, 10:293-302.
19. Fincke OM, Farevieille A, Schulz TD. Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2007, 61:1121-1131.
20. Henry CS, Wells MLM, Holsinger KE. The inheritance of mating songs in two cryptic, sibling lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Genetica 2002, 116:269-289.
21. Hoikkala A, Welbergen P. Signals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtships of 3 Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species. Anim. Behav. 1995, 50:177-190.
22. Hoikkala A, Saarikettu M, Paallysaho S, Ritchie MG. Co-evolution of male courtship songs and female song preferences in Drosophila virilis group species. Behav. Genet. 2002, 32:470-470.
23. Hosken DJ, Stockley P. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:87-93.
24. Huber BA, Sinclair BJ, Scmitt M. The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82:647-698.
25. Law JH, Crespi BJ. The evolution of geographic parthenogenesis in Timema walking-sticks. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:1471-1489.
26. Lee C, Blay S, Mooers AO, Singh A, Oakley TH. CoMET: a mesquite package for comparing models of continuous character evolution on phylogenies. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2006, 2:193-196.
27. McPeek MA, Shen L, Torrey JZ, Farid H. The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:E158-E178.
28. McPeek MA, Shen L, Farid H. The correlated evolution of three-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution 2009, 63:73-83.
29. Mooers Athomampersand, Vamosi SM, Schluter D. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in Cranes (Gruinae). Am. Nat. 1999, 154:249-259.
30. Nosil P. Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:1521-1528.
31. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 2004, 58:102-112.
32. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:991-997.
33. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 2002, 417:440-443.
34. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:1911-1918.
35. Nylander JAA. MrModeltest v2 2004, Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
36. Pagel M. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 1997, 26:331-348.
37. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:364-371.
38. Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP. Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Mol. Biol. Evol.
39. Paulson DR. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Syst. Zool. 1974, 23:40-49.
40. Pavoine S, Ollierb S, Pontiera D, Chessela D. Testing for phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits: new matrices of phylogenetic proximities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2008, 73:79-91.
41. Polihronakis M. Morphometric analysis of intraspecific shape variation in male and female genitalia of Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2006, 99:144-150.
42. Prager M, Andersson S. Phylogeny and evolution of sexually selected tail ornamentation in widowbirds and bishops (Euplectes spp.). J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:2068-2076.
43. Price DK, Boake CRB. Behavioural reproductive isolation in Drosophila-silvestris, D-heteroneura, and their F1 hybrids (Diptera, Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 1995, 8:595-616.
44. Robertson HM, Paterson HEH. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odanata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 1982, 36:243-250.
45. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: Bayesion phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
46. Saarikettu M, Liimatainen JO, Hoikkala A. Intraspecific variation in mating behaviour does not cause sexual isolation between Drosophila virilis strains. Anim. Behav. 2005, 70:417-426.
47. Sandoval CP, Crespi BJ. Adaptive evolution of cryptic coloration: the shape of host plants and dorsal stripes in Timema walking-sticks. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 94:1-5.
48. Seddon N. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 2005, 59:200-215.
49. Shen L, Makedon F. Spherical mapping for processing of 3D closed surfaces. Image Vis. Comput. 2006, 24:743-761.
50. Shen L, Farid H, McPeek MA. Modeling three-dimensional morphological structures using spherical harmonics. Evolution 2009, 63:1003-1016.
51. Vickery VR. Revision of Timema Scudder (Phasmatoptera, Timematodea) including 3 new species. Can. Entomol. 1993, 125:657-692.