Rotation direction affects object recognition

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 14, 2004, Pages 1717-1730

  Vuong, Quoc C ^a,b   Tarr, Michael J ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motion; Object perception; Object recognition; Rotation; Spatiotemporal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2342468055     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bassili J.N. Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4:1978;373-379
2. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review. 94:1987;115-147
3. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;1162-1182
4. Biederman I., Ju G. Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology. 20:1988;38-64
5. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;433-436
6. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 89:1992;60-64
7. Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T., Thornton I.M. Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition. 80:2001;47-60
8. Cutting J., Kozlowski L. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society. 9:1977;353-356
9. Domini F., Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;426-444
10. Freyd J. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review. 94:1987;427-438
11. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979;Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA
12. Harman K.L., Humphrey G.K. Encoding regular and random sequences of view of novel three-dimensional objects. Perception. 28:1999;601-615
13. Hayward W.G. Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;427-440
14. Hayward W.G., Williams P. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science. 11:2000;7-12
15. Hill H., Pollick F.E. Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light display. Psychological Science. 11:2000;223-227
16. Humphrey G.K., Khan S.C. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 46:1992;170-190
17. Kelly M.H., Freyd J. Explorations of representational momentum. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;369-401
18. Knappmeyer B., Thornton I.M., Bülthoff H.H. The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research. 43:2003;1921-1936
19. Kourtzi Z., Shiffar M. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Acta Psychologica. 102:1999;265-292
20. Landes K., Bruce V. Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology. 12:2000;259-272
21. Lawson R., Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G. Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: Evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures. Perception. 23:1994;595-614
22. Liu T., Cooper L.A. Explicit and implicit memory for rotating objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 29:2003;554-562
23. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 200:1978;269-294
24. Mather G., Murdoch L. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 258:1994;273-279
25. Mitsumatsu H., Yokosawa K. Efficient extrapolation of the view with a dynamic and predictive stimulus. Perception. 32:2003;969-983
26. Munger M.P., Solberg J.L., Horrocks K.K., Preston A.S. Representational momentum for rotations in depth: Effects of shading and axis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 25:1999;157-171
27. Naor-Raz G., Tarr M.J., Kersten D. Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception. 32:2003;667-680
28. O'Toole A.J., Roark D.A., Abdi H. Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;261-266
29. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;437-442
30. Pike G.E., Kemp R.I., Towell N.A., Phillips K.C. Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition. 4:1997;409-437
31. Price C.J., Humphreys G.W. The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41A:1989;797-828
32. Rubin, N., & Albert, N. (2001). Real-world scenes can be easily recognized from their edge-detected renditions: Just add motion! In First annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL, May 4-8
33. Stone J.V. Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research. 38:1998;947-951
34. Stone J.V. Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research. 39:1999;4032-4044
35. Tanaka J., Weiskopf D., Williams P. The role of color in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Science. 5:2001;211-215
36. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2:1995;55-82
37. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine. Cognition. 67:1998;1-20
38. Tarr M.J., Kersten D., Bülthoff H.H. Why the visual system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Research. 38:1998;2259-2275
39. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology. 21:1989;233-282
40. Tarr M.J., Williams P., Hayward W.G., Gauthier I. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint-dependent. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;275-277
41. Thornton I.M., Kourtzi Z. A matching advantage for dynamic faces. Perception. 31:2002;113-132
42. Todd J.T. The visual perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Epstein W., Rogers S. Perception of space and motion. 1995;201-226 Academic Press, New York
43. Todd J.T., Bressan P. The perception of 3dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics. 48:1990;419-430
44. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136
45. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion. 1979;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Vuong, Q. C. (2004). Spatio-temporal signatures for object recognition: Motion and shape interact in discriminating, remembering, and learning novel rotating objects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA