Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 519-526

  Lander, Karen ^a   Davies, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FACE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FACE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTION PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34247197083     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601117559     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339-360.
2. Cavanagh, P., Labianca, A., & Thornton, I. M. (2001). Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition, 80, 47-60.
3. Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1998). The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition, 26, 780-790.
4. Freyd, J. J., & Pantzer, T. M. (1995). Static patterns moving in the mind. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance: XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 99-120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223-233.
6. Knappmeyer, B., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2003). The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research, 43, 1921-1936.
7. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265-273.
8. Kourtzi, Z., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Dissociable signatures of processing for moving and static objects. Visual Cognition, 9, 248-264.
9. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2000). Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 259-272.
10. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2003). The role of motion in learning new faces. Visual Cognition, 10, 897-912.
11. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2004). Repetition priming from moving faces. Memory & Cognition, 32, 640-647.
12. Lander, K., Bruce, V., & Hill, H. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of pixelation and blurring on masking the identity of familiar faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 101-116.
13. Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory & Cognition, 27, 974-985.
14. Lander, K., & Chuang, L. (2005). Why are moving faces easier to recognize? Visual Cognition, 12, 429-442.
15. Lander, K., Chuang, L., & Wickham, L. H. V. (2006). Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 801-809.
16. O'Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 261-266.
17. Pike, G. E., Kemp, R. I., Towell, N. A., & Phillips, K. C. (1997). Recognising moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition, 4, 409-437.
18. Pilz, K. S., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). A search advantage for faces learned in motion. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 436-447.
19. Thornton, I. M., & Kourtzi, Z. (2001). A matching advantage for dynamic faces. Perception, 31, 113-132.
20. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.