The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 1921-1936

  Knappmeyer, Barbara ^a   Thornton, Ian M ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer animation; Cue integration; Face recognition; Facial form; Facial motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACE; FACE PROFILE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VISION;

EID: 0038798705     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00236-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bassili J. Facial motion in the perception of faces and emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4:1978;373-379.
2. Bernstein L.J., Cooper L.A. Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23(3):1997;721-737.
3. Berry D.S. What can a moving face tell us? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58(6):1990;1004-1014.
4. Berry D.S. Child and adult sensitivity to gender information in patterns of facial motion. Ecological Psychology. 3(4):1991;348-366.
5. Blanz V., Vetter T. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Computer Graphics Proceedings SIGGRAPH. 1999;187-194.
6. Bradley D.C., Chang G.C., Andersen R.A. Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature. 392:1998;714-717.
7. Bruce V., Henderson Z., Greenwood K., Hancock P.J.B., Burton A.M., Miller P. Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Applied. 5(4):1999;339-360.
8. Bruce V., Valentine T. When a nod's as good as a wink: The role of dynamic information in facial recognition. Gruneberg M.M., Morris P.E., Sykes R.N. Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues. Vol. 1:1988;169-174 Wiley, Chichester.
9. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 7:1986;305-327.
10. Campbell R., de Gelder B., de Haan E. The lateralization of lip-reading: A second look. Neuropsychologia. 34(12):1996;1235-1240.
11. Christie F., Bruce V. The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Memory and Cognition. 26:1998;780-790.
12. Davies G., Ellis H.D., Shepherd J. Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 63:1978;180-187.
13. Decety J., Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive. Sciences. 3(5):1999;172-178.
14. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Morphable models for the analysis and synthesis of complex motion patterns. International Journal of Computer Vision. 38(1):2000;59-73.
15. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4:2003;179-192.
16. Giese M.A., Knappmeyer B., Bülthoff H.H. Automatic synthesis of sequences of human movements by linear combination of learned example patterns. Bülthoff H.H., Lee S.W., Poggio T., Wallraven C. Biologically motivated computer vision. 2002;538-547.
17. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain Areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron. 35:2002;1167-1175.
18. Hancock P.J.B., Bruce V., Burton A.M. Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4(9):2000;330-337.
19. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4(6):2000;223-233.
20. Hill H., Johnston A. Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology. 11:2001;880-885.
21. Hill H., Pollick F.E., Kamachi M., Troje N.F., Watson T., Johnston A. Using the principles of facial caricature to exaggerate human motion. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;60.
22. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics. 1:1973;201-211.
23. Kamachi M., Bruce V., Mukaida S., Gyoba J., Yoshikawa S., Akamatsu S. Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial expressions. Perception. 30:2001;875-887.
24. Knappmeyer, B., Thornton, I. M., Etcoff, N., & Bülthoff, H. (2002). Facial motion and the perception of facial attractiveness. Vision ScienceS Society, 2nd Annual Meeting, Sarasota, Florida, 10-15 May.
25. Knight B., Johnston A. The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition. 4:1997;265-273.
26. Kourtzi Z., Bülthoff H.H., Erb M., Grodd W. Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nature Neuroscience. 5(1):2002;17-18.
27. Lander K., Bruce V. Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology. 12:2000;259-272.
28. Lander K., Bruce V., Hill H. Evaluating the effectiveness of pixalation and blurring on masking the identity of familiar faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 15:2001;101-116.
29. Lander K., Christie F., Bruce V. The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition. 27:1999;974-985.
30. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after-effects. Nature Neuroscience. 4(1):2001;89-94.
31. Lorenceau J., Alais D. Form constraints in motion binding. Nature Neuroscience. 4(7):2001;745-751.
32. Oram M.W., Perrett D.I. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to "biological motion" stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 6:1994;99-116.
33. O'Toole A.J., Roark D.A., Abdi H. Recognizing moving faces: Psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6(6):2002;261-266.
34. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voack I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., Henzi S.P., Castles D.L., Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 394:1998;884-887.
35. Pike G.E., Kemp R.I., Towell N.A., Phillips K.C. Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition. 4:1997;409-437.
36. Rhodes G., Brennan S., Carey S. Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representation of faces. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;473-497.
37. Rosenblum L.D., Yakel D.A., Baseer N., Panchal A., Nordase B.C., Niehus R.P. Visual speech information for face recognition. Perception and Psychophysics. 64(2):2002;220-229.
38. Schiff W., Banka L., Galdi G.D. Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic "mug shots" American Journal of Psychology. 99:1986;219-231.
39. Stone J., Harper N. Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research. 39:1999;4032-4044.
40. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology-A. 46:1993;225-245.
41. Thompson P. Margaret thatcher: A new illusion? Perception. 9:1980;483-484.
42. Thornton I.M., Kourtzi Z. A matching advantage for dynamic human faces. Perception. 31(1):2002;113-132.
43. Troje N.F., Bülthoff H.H. How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views. Vision Research. 38:1998;79-89.
44. Troje N.F., Bülthoff H.H. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research. 36(12):1996;1761-1771.
45. Troje N.F., Kersten D. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception. 28:1999;483-487.
46. Wallis G., Bülthoff H.H. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. PNAS. 98(8):2001;4800-4804.
47. Watson T.L., Hill H., Johnston A. View invariance in facial motion. Perception. 31:2002;119.
48. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception and Psychophysics. 63(8):2001;1293-1313.
49. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81:1969;141-145.