Recognizing Famous Faces: Exploring the Benefits of Facial Motion

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 259-272

  Lander, Karen ^a   Bruce, Vicki ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034359894     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1204_01     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alley, T. R. (1999, August). Perception of static and dynamic computer displays of facial appearance in applied settings. In L. D. Rosenblum (Chair), Reconsidering the information for faces. Symposium conducted at the 10th International Conference on Perception and Action (ICEP-X), Edinburgh, Scotland.
2. Bassili, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 373-379.
3. Bassili, J. N. (1979). Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of the upper and lower areas of the face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2049-2058.
4. Biederman, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In S. Kosslyn & D. Osherson (Eds.), Invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., pp. 121-165). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bingham, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling - Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 155-177.
6. Bruce, V. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition. The M. D. Vernon Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 5-28.
7. Bruce, V., & Langton, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognizing the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23, 803-822.
8. Bruce, V., & Valentine, T. (1988). When a nod's as good as a wink. The role of dynamic information in facial recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg & E. Morris (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 169-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Data Translation. (1995). Media 100 user manual. Marlboro, MA: Author.
10. Davies, G., Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.
11. Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 26, 727-738.
12. Edwards, K. (1998). The face of time: Temporal cues in facial expression of emotion. Psychological Science, 9, 270-276.
13. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
14. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for it's analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
15. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265-273.
16. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
17. Lander, K., Bruce, V., & Hill, H. (in press). Evaluating the effectiveness of pixelation and blurring on masking the identity of familiar faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
18. Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition, 27, 974-985.
19. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and "nonparametric" indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 401-413.
20. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect-fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
21. Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldaña, H. M. (1998). Time-varying information for visual speech perception. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreadingand auditory-visual speech (pp. 61-81). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
22. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740.
23. Stone, J. V. (1998). Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research, 38, 947-951.