The role of bioreactors in cartilage tissue engineering

Current Stem Cell Research and Therapy

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 287-292

  Mabvuure, Nigel ^a   Hindocha, Sandip ^b   Khan, Wasim S ^c  

^a BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Plastic Surgery   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Cartilage; Cartilage engineering; Chondrogenesis; Design; Scaffold

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTOR; CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE CELL; CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING; COMPRESSIONAL FORCE; FORCE; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NUTRIENT SUPPLY; OXYGEN TENSION; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTOR; REVIEW; ROTATING WALL VESSEL BIOREACTOR; TEMPERATURE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOREACTORS; CARTILAGE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; OXYGEN; REGENERATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84862627211     PISSN: 1574888X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157488812800793018     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Nannaparaju M, Oragui E, Khan W. The role of stem cells, scaffolds and bioreactors in musculoskeletal tissue engineering. In: Xiao Y, editor. Mesenchymal Stem Cells. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2011.
2. Mahmoudifar N, Doran PM. Chondrogenesis and cartilage tissue engineering: the longer road to technology development. Trends Biotechnol 2012; 30(3): 166-76.
3. Depprich R, Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Jasche-Meyer J, Meyer U. Use of bioreactors in maxillofacial tissue engineering. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46(5): 349-54.
4. Oragui E, Nannaparaju M, Khan WS. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering for musculoskeletal applications. Open Orthop J 2011; 5(Suppl 2): 267-70.
5. Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22(2): 80-6.
6. Obradovic B, Martin I, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Bioreactor studies of natural and tissue engineered cartilage. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2001; 3(2): 181-9.
7. Begley CM, Kleis SJ. The fluid dynamic and shear environment in the NASA/JSC rotating-wall perfused-vessel bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000; 70(1): 32-40.
8. Sakai S, Mishima H, Ishii T, et al. Rotating three-dimensional dynamic culture of adult human bone marrow-derived cells for tissue engineering of hyaline cartilage. J Orthop Res 2009; 27(4): 517-21.
9. Yoshioka T, Mishima H, Ohyabu Y, et al. Repair of large osteochondral defects with allogeneic cartilaginous aggregates formed from bone marrow-derived cells using RWV bioreactor. J Orthop Res 2007; 25(10): 1291-8.
10. Marlovits S, Tichy B, Truppe M, Gruber D, Schlegel W. Collagen expression in tissue engineered cartilage of aged human articular chondrocytes in a rotating bioreactor. Int J Artif Organs 2003; 26(4): 319-30.
11. Williams KA, Saini S, Wick TM. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of steady-state momentum and mass transport in a bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog 2002; 18(5): 951-63.
12. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, Mikos AG. Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Eng 2003; 9(3): 549-54.
13. Griffon DJ, Abulencia JP, Ragetly GR, Fredericks LP, Chaieb S. A comparative study of seeding techniques and three-dimensional matrices for mesenchymal cell attachment. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2011; 5(3): 169-79.
14. Freed LE, Langer R, Martin I, Pellis NR, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Tissue engineering of cartilage in space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94(25): 13885-90.
15. Vunjak-Novakovic G, Freed LE, Biron RJ, Langer R. Effects of mixing on the composition and morphology of tissue-engineered cartilage. AIChE Journal 1996; 42(3): 850-60.
16. Alves da Silva ML, Martins A, Costa-Pinto AR, et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in chitosan-based scaffolds using a flow-perfusion bioreactor. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2011; 5(9): 722-32.
17. Shahin K, Doran PM. Strategies for enhancing the accumulation and retention of extracellular matrix in tissue-engineered cartilage cultured in bioreactors. PLoS One 2011; 6(8): e23119.
18. Santoro R, Olivares AL, Brans G, et al. Bioreactor based engineering of large-scale human cartilage grafts for joint resurfacing. Biomaterials 2010; 31(34): 8946-52.
19. Wernike E, Li Z, Alini M, Grad S. Effect of reduced oxygen tension and long-term mechanical stimulation on chondrocytepolymer constructs. Cell Tissue Res 2008; 331(2): 473-83.
20. Das RH, van Osch GJ, Kreukniet M, Oostra J, Weinans H, Jahr H. Effects of individual control of pH and hypoxia in chondrocyte culture. J Orthop Res 2010; 28(4): 537-45.
21. Lovett M, Rockwood D, Baryshyan A, Kaplan DL. Simple modular bioreactors for tissue engineering: a system for characterization of oxygen gradients, human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, and prevascularization. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010; 16(6): 1565-73.
22. Domm C, Schünke M, Christesen K, Kurz B. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated bovine articular chondrocytes in alginate culture under low oxygen tension. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2002; 10(1): 13-22.
23. Meyer EG, Buckley CT, Thorpe SD, Kelly DJ. Low oxygen tension is a more potent promoter of chondrogenic differentiation than dynamic compression. J Biomech 2010; 43(13): 2516-23.
24. Malladi P, Xu Y, Chiou M, Giaccia AJ, Longaker MT. Effect of reduced oxygen tension on chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in adipose-derived mesenchymal cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006; 290(4): C1139-46.
25. Obradovic B, Carrier RL, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Freed LE. Gas exchange is essential for bioreactor cultivation of tissue engineered cartilage. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999; 63(2): 197-205.
26. Ysart GE, Mason RM. Responses of articular cartilage explant cultures to different oxygen tensions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994; 1221(1): 15-20.
27. Malda J, Martens DE, Tramper J, van Blitterswijk CA, Riesle J. Cartilage tissue engineering: controversy in the effect of oxygen. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2003; 23(3): 175-94.
28. Portner R, Goepfert C, Wiegandt K, et al. Technical strategies to improve tissue engineering of cartilage-carrier-constructs. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2009; 112: 145-81.
29. Heyland J, Wiegandt K, Goepfert C, et al. Redifferentiation of chondrocytes and cartilage formation under intermittent hydrostatic pressure. Biotechnol Lett 2006; 28(20): 1641-8.
30. Schulz RM, Bader A. Cartilage tissue engineering and bioreactor systems for the cultivation and stimulation of chondrocytes. Eur Biophys J 2007; 36(4-5): 539-68.
31. Ogawa R, Mizuno S, Murphy GF, Orgill DP. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on three-dimensional chondroinduction of human adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15(10): 2937-45.
32. Elder BD, Athanasiou KA. Hydrostatic pressure in articular cartilage tissue engineering: from chondrocytes to tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009; 15(1): 43-53.
33. Wenger R, Hans MG, Welter JF, Solchaga LA, Sheu YR, Malemud CJ. Hydrostatic pressure increases apoptosis in cartilage-constructs produced from human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Front Biosci 2006; 11: 1690-5.
34. Takahashi I, Nuckolls GH, Takahashi K, et al. Compressive force promotes sox9, type II collagen and aggrecan and inhibits IL-1beta expression resulting in chondrogenesis in mouse embryonic limb bud mesenchymal cells. J Cell Sci 1998; 111 (Pt 14): 2067-76.
35. Nugent GE, Schmidt TA, Schumacher BL, et al. Static and dynamic compression regulate cartilage metabolism of PRoteoGlycan 4 (PRG4). Biorheology 2006; 43(3-4): 191-200.
36. Li KW, Williamson AK, Wang AS, Sah RL. Growth responses of cartilage to static and dynamic compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (391 Suppl): S34-48.
37. Park S, Hung CT, Ateshian GA. Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2004; 12(1): 65-73.
38. Haugh MG, Meyer EG, Thorpe SD, Vinardell T, Duffy GP, Kelly DJ. Temporal and spatial changes in cartilage-matrix-specific gene expression in mesenchymal stem cells in response to dynamic compression. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17(23-24): 3085-93.
39. Liu C, Abedian R, Meister R, et al. Influence of perfusion and compression on the proliferation and differentiation of bone mesenchymal stromal cells seeded on polyurethane scaffolds. Biomaterials 2012; 33(4): 1052-64.
40. Schatti O, Grad S, Goldhahn J, et al. A combination of shear and dynamic compression leads to mechanically induced chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 22: 214-25.
41. Hoenig E, Winkler T, Mielke G, et al. High amplitude direct compressive strain enhances mechanical properties of scaffold-free tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17(9-10): 1401-11.
42. Huang AH, Farrell MJ, Kim M, Mauck RL. Long-term dynamic loading improves the mechanical properties of chondrogenic mesenchymal stem cell-laden hydrogel. Eur Cell Mater 2010; 19: 72-85.
43. Thorpe SD, Buckley CT, Vinardell T, O'Brien FJ, Campbell VA, Kelly DJ. Dynamic compression can inhibit chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2008; 377(2): 458-62.
44. Zhu F, Wang P, Lee NH, Goldring MB, Konstantopoulos K. Prolonged application of high fluid shear to chondrocytes recapitulates gene expression profiles associated with osteoarthritis. PLoS One 2010; 5(12): e15174.
45. Wang P, Zhu F, Tong Z, Konstantopoulos K. Response of chondrocytes to shear stress: antagonistic effects of the binding partners Toll-like receptor 4 and caveolin-1. FASEB J 2011; 25(10): 3401-15.
46. Martin JA, Heiner AD, Buckwalter JA. High shear stress induces p53 expression and apoptosis in cartilage explants. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2004; 12: S47-S.
47. Gemmiti CV, Guldberg RE. Fluid flow increases type II collagen deposition and tensile mechanical properties in bioreactor-grown tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng 2006; 12(3): 469-79.
48. Stevens MM, Marini RP, Schaefer D, Aronson J, Langer R, Shastri VP. In vivo engineering of organs: the bone bioreactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(32): 11450-5.