Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue FEB, 2012, Pages

  Snyder, Joel S ^a   Gregg, Melissa K ^a   Weintraub, David M ^a   Alain, Claude ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attentional blink; Auditory scene analysis; Change deafness; Informational masking; Multistability; Priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862551633     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00015     Document Type: Review

References (181)

1. Ahveninen, J., Hamalainen, M., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Ahlfors, S. P., Huang, S., Lin, F. H., Raij, T., Sams, M., Vasios, C. E., and Belliveau, J. W. (2011). Attention-driven auditory cortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 4182-4187.
2. Alain, C. (2007). Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception. Hear. Res. 229, 225-236.
3. Alain, C., and Arnott, S. R. (2000). Selectively attending to auditory objects. Front. Biosci. 5, D202-D212.
4. Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., and Picton, T. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from eventrelated brain potentials. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 1072-1089.
5. Alain, C., and Izenberg, A. (2003). Effects of attentional load on auditory scene analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 1063-1073.
6. Alain, C., Reinke, K., He, Y., Wang, C. H., and Lobaugh, N. (2005). Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 811-818.
7. Alain, C., and Woods, D. L. (1993). Distractor clustering enhances detection speed and accuracy during selective listening. Percept. Psy- chophys. 54, 509-514.
8. Alain, C., and Woods, D. L. (1994). Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans. Percept. Psychophys. 56, 501-516.
9. Andreou, L. V., Kashino, M., and Chait, M. (2011). The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation. Hear. Res. 280, 228-235.
10. Assmann, P. F., and Summerfield, Q. (1990). Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 680-697.
11. Basirat, A., Sato, M., Schwartz, J. L., Kahane, P., and Lachaux, J. P. (2008). Parieto-frontal gamma band activity during the perceptual emergence of speech forms. Neuroimage 42, 404-413.
12. Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., and Winkler, I. (2010). Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3658-3666.
13. Bentin, S., and Mann, V. (1990). Masking and stimulus-intensity effects on duplex perception:a confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes. J.Acoust. Soc.Am. 88, 64-74.
14. Bey, C., and McAdams, S. (2002). Schema-based processing in auditory scene analysis. Percept. Psy- chophys. 64, 844-854.
15. Bidet-Caulet, A., Fischer, C., Besle, J., Aguera, P. E., Giard, M. H., and Bertrand, O. (2007). Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 27, 9252-9261.
16. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-bycomponents: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147.
17. Boly, M., Garrido, M. I., Gosseries, O., Bruno, M. A., Boveroux, P., Schnakers, C., Massimini, M., Litvak, V., Laureys, S., and Friston, K. (2011). Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science 332, 858-862.
18. Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychol. Bull. 50, 169-189.
19. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organiza- tion of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Bregman, A. S., and Campbell, J. (1971). Primaryauditorystreamsegregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. J. Exp. Psychol. 89, 244-249.
21. Broadbent, D. E., and Broadbent, M. H. (1987). From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 105-113.
22. Carlyon, R. P. (2004). How the brain separates sounds. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 8, 465-471.
23. Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., and Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 115-127.
24. Carlyon, R. P., Plack, C. J., Fantini, D. A., and Cusack, R. (2003). Crossmodal and non-sensory influences on auditory streaming. Perception 32, 1393-1402.
25. Chalikia, M. H., and Bregman, A. S. (1989). The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 46, 487-496.
26. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 975-979.
27. Chun, M. M., and Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 109-127.
28. Chun, M. M., and Potter, M. C. (2001). "The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities,"in The Limits of Attention: Tem- poral Constraints in Human Infor- mation Processing, ed. K. Shapiro (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 20-35.
29. Ciocca, V. (2008). The auditory organization of complex sounds. Front. Biosci. 13, 148-169
30. Crick, F., and Koch, C. (1995). Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375, 121-123.
31. Crick, F., and Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nat. Neu- rosci. 6, 119-126
32. Crowley, K. E., and Colrain, I. M. (2004). A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neuro- physiol. 115, 732-744.
33. Cusack, R. (2005). The intraparietal sulcus and perceptual organization. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 641-651.
34. Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., and Carlyon, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 643-656.
35. Cutting, J. E. (1976). Auditory and linguistic processes in speechperception: inferences from 6 fusions in dichotic-listening. Psychol. Rev. 83, 114-140.
36. Daltrozzo, J., Signoret, C., Tillmann, B., and Perrin, F. (2011). Subliminal semantic priming in speech. PLoS ONE 6, e20273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020273
37. Danzinger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 16, 241-262.
38. Davis, C., Kim, J., and Barbaro, A. (2010). Masked speech priming: neighborhood size matters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2110-2113.
39. Davis, M. H., Coleman, M. R., Absalom, A. R., Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., Matta, B. F., Owen, A. M., and Menon, D. K. (2007). Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 16032-16037.
40. Demany, L., Trost, W., Serman, M., and Semal, C. (2008). Auditory change detection: simple sounds are not memorized better than complex sounds. Psychol. Sci. 19, 85-91.
41. Denham, S. L., and Winkler, I. (2006). The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J. Physiol. Paris 100, 154-170.
42. Deutsch, D. (1997). The tritone paradox: a link between music and speech. Curr.Dir.Psychol.Sci.6, 174-180.
43. Devergie, A., Grimault, N., Tillmann, B., and Berthommier, F. (2010). Effect of rhythmic attention on the segregation of interleaved melodies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, EL1-EL7.
44. Ding, N., and Simon, J. Z. (2012). Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. J. Neurophys- iol. 107, 78-89.
45. Ditzinger, T., Tuller, B., Haken, H., and Kelso, J. A. S. (1997a). A synergetic model for the verbal transformation effect. Biol. Cybern. 77, 31-40.
46. Ditzinger, T., Tuller, B., and Kelso, J. A. S. (1997b). Temporal patterning in an auditory illusion: the verbal transformation effect. Biol. Cybern. 77, 23-30.
47. Donner, T. H., Sagi, D., Bonneh, Y. S., and Heeger, D. J. (2008). Opposite neural signatures of motioninduced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 10298-10310.
48. Dowling, W. J. (1973). Perception of interleaved melodies. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 322-337.
49. Dowling, W. J., Lung, K. M. T., and Herrbold, S. (1987). Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies. Percept. Psychophys. 41, 642-656.
50. Du, F., and Abrams, R. A. (2010). Endogenous orienting is reduced during the attentional blink. Exp. Brain Res. 205, 115-121.
51. Duncan, J., Martens, S., and Ward, R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature 387, 808-810.
52. Dupoux, E., De Gardelle, V., and Kouider, S. (2008). Subliminal speech perception and auditory streaming. Cognition 109, 267-273.
53. Durlach, N. I., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. Jr., Arbogast, T. L., Colburn, H. S., and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2003a). Note on informational masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2984-2987.
54. Durlach, N. I., Mason, C. R., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Arbogast, T. L., Colburn, H. S., and Kidd, G. Jr. (2003b). Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing targetmasker similarity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 368-379.
55. Dykstra, A. R., Halgren, E., Thesen, T., Carlson, C. E., Doyle, W., Madsen, J. R., Eskandar, E. N., and Cash, S. S. (2011). Widespread brain areas engaged during a classical auditory streaming task revealed by intracranial EEG. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:74. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00074
56. Dyson, B. J., Alain, C., and He, Y. (2005). Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 319-338.
57. Edelman, S. (1998). Representation is representation of similarities. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 449-498.
58. Elhilali, M., Ma, L., Micheyl, C., Oxenham, A. J., and Shamma, S. A. (2009a). Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes. Neuron 61, 317-329.
59. Elhilali, M., Xiang, J. J., Shamma, S. A., and Simon, J. Z. (2009b). Interaction between attention and bottomup saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000129. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000129
60. Engelien, A., Huber, W., Silbersweig, D., Stern, E., Frith, C. D., Doring, W., Thron, A., and Frackowiak, R. S. (2000). The neural correlates of 'deaf-hearing' in man: conscious sensory awareness enabled by attentional modulation. Brain 123, 532-545.
61. Eramudugolla, R., Irvine, D. R. F., McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., and Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Directed attention eliminates 'change deafness' in complex auditory scenes. Curr. Biol. 15, 1108-1113.
62. Fowler, C. A., and Rosenblum, L. D. (1990). Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 742-754.
63. Greene, M. R., and Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cogn. Psychol. 58, 137-176.
64. Gregg, M. K., and Samuel, A. G. (2008). Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 974-991.
65. Gregg, M. K., and Samuel, A. G. (2009). The importance of semantics in auditory representations. Atten. Per- cept. Psychophys. 71, 607-619.
66. Gutschalk, A., Micheyl, C., Melcher, J. R., Rupp, A., Scherg, M., and Oxenham, A. J. (2005). Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 25, 5382-5388.
67. Gutschalk, A., Micheyl, C., and Oxenham, A. J. (2008). Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking. PLoS Biol. 6, e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138
68. Hansen, J. C., and Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neu- rophysiol. 49, 277-290.
69. Hautus, M. J., and Johnson, B. W. (2005). Object-related brain potentials associated with the perceptual segregation of a dichotically embedded pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 275-280.
70. Hill, K. T., Bishop, C. W., Yadav, D., and Miller, L. M. (2011). Pattern of BOLD signal in auditory cortex relates acoustic response to perceptual streaming. BMC Neurosci. 12, 85. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-85
71. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., and Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182, 171-180.
72. Hochstein, S., and Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791-804.
73. Hock, H. S., Kelso, J. A. S., and Schoner, G. (1993). Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 63-80.
74. Horváth, J., and Burgyan, A. (2011). Distraction and the auditory attentional blink. Atten. Percept. Psy- chophys. 73, 695-701.
75. Hupé, J. M., Joffo, L. M., and Pressnitzer, D. (2008). Bistability for audiovisual stimuli: perceptual decision is modality specific. J. Vis. 8, 1-15.
76. Hupé, J. M., and Rubin, N. (2003). The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res. 43, 531-548.
77. Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H., and Patel, A. D. (2009). "Top-down control of rhythm perception modulates early auditory responses,"in Neurosciences and Music III: Disorders and Plas- ticity, eds S. Dallabella, N. Kraus, K. Overy, C. Pantev, J. S. Snyder, M. Tervaniemi, B. Tillmann, and G. Schlaug (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 58-S73.
78. Johnson, B. W., Hautus, M., and Clapp, W. C. (2003). Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 2245-2250.
79. Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension - toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol. Rev. 83, 323-355.
80. Jones, M. R., and Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol. Rev. 96, 459-491.
81. Jones, M. R., Kidd, G., and Wetzel, R. (1981). Evidence for rhythmic attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 1059-1073.
82. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
83. Kanai, R., Tsuchiya, N., and Verstraten, F. A. (2006). The scope and limits of top-down attention in unconscious visual processing. Curr. Biol. 16, 2332-2336.
84. Kerlin, J. R., Shahin, A. J., and Miller, L. M. (2010). Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party." J. Neurosci. 30, 620-628.
85. Kidd, G. Jr., Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., and Gallun, F. J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3804-3815.
86. Kidd, G. Jr., Mason, C. R., and Richards, V. M. (2003). Multiple bursts, multiple looks, and stream coherence in the release from informational masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2835-2845.
87. Kidd, G., Mason, C. R., Deliwala, P. S., Woods, W. S., and Colburn, H. S. (1994). Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3475-3480.
88. Kidd, G., Mason, C. R., Richards, V. M., Gallun, F. J., and Durlach, N. I. (2007). "Informational masking," in Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, eds W. A. Yost, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (New York: Springer), 143-189.
89. Kim, C. Y., and Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible 'invisible.' Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 381-388
90. Koch, C., and Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11, 16-22
91. Kondo, H. M., and Kashino, M. (2007). Neural mechanisms of auditory awareness underlying verbal transformations. Neuroimage 36, 123-130.
92. Kondo, H. M., and Kashino, M. (2009). Involvement of the thalamocortical loop in the spontaneous switching of percepts in auditory streaming. J. Neurosci. 29, 12695-12701.
93. Kouider, S., de Gardelle, V., Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., and Pallier, C. (2010). Cerebral bases of subliminal speech priming. Neuroimage 49, 922-929.
94. Kouider, S., and Dupoux, E. (2005). Subliminal speech priming. Psychol. Sci. 16, 617-625.
95. Lamme, V. A. (2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural. Netw. 17, 861-872.
96. Large, E. W., and Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychol. Rev. 106, 119-159.
97. Leopold, D. A., and Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 3, 254-264.
98. Leung, A. W., Jolicoeur, P., Vachon, F., and Alain, C. (2011). The perception of concurrent sound objects in harmonic complexes impairs gap detection. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 727-736.
99. Long, G. M., and Toppino, T. C. (2004). Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. Psychol. Bull. 130, 748-768.
100. Martens, S., and Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Mem. Cognit. 33, 234-240.
101. McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., Eramudugolla, R., Stuart, G. W., Irvine, D. R. F., and Mattingley, J. B. (2010). A dual-process account of auditory change detection. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 994-1004.
102. McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., and Holt, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 10, 363-369.
103. McDermott, J. H., Wrobleski, D., and Oxenham, A. J. (2011). Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 1188-1193
104. McDonald, K. L., and Alain, C. (2005). Contribution of harmonicity and location to auditory object formation in free field: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1593-1604.
105. Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., Gutschalk, A., Melcher, J. R., Oxenham, A. J., Rauschecker, J. P., Tian, B., and Courtenay Wilson, E. (2007a). The role of auditory cortex in the formation of auditory streams. Hear. Res. 229, 116-131.
106. Micheyl, C., Shamma, S. A., and Oxenham, A. J. (2007b). "Hearing out repeating elements in randomly varying multitone sequences: a case of streaming?"in Hearing: From Sen- sory Processing to Perception, edsB. Kollmeier, G. Klump, V. Hohmann, U. Langemann, M. Mauermann, S. Uppenkamp, and J. Verhey. (Berlin: Springer), 267-274.
107. Micheyl, C., and Oxenham, A. J. (2010). Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 709-724
108. Micheyl, C., Tian, B., Carlyon, R. P., and Rauschecker, J. P. (2005). Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Neuron 48, 139-148.
109. Miller, G. A., and Heise, G. A. (1950). The trill threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 637-638.
110. Moore, B. C. J. (1978). Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 524-532.
111. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Peters, R. W. (1986). Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 479-483.
112. Moore, B. C. J., and Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust. United Ac. 88, 320-333.
113. Movshon, J. A., Adelson, E. H., Gizzi, M. S., and Newsome, W. T. (1985). "The analysis of moving visual patterns," in Study Group on Pattern Recognition Mechanisms, eds C. Chagas, R. Gattass, and C. G. Gross (Vatican City: Pontifica Academia Scientiarum), 117-151.
114. Näätänen, R., and Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24, 375-425
115. Nahum, M., Nelken, I., and Ahissar, M. (2008). Low-level information and high-level perception: the case of speech in noise. PLoS Biol. 6, e126. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060126
116. Neff, D. L., and Green, D. M. (1987). Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers. Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415.
117. Newman, R. S., and Evers, S. (2007). The effect of talker familiarity on stream segregation. J. Phon. 35, 85-103.
118. Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2006). Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 973-985.
119. Nygaard, L. C. (1993). Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 268-286.
120. Nygaard, L. C., and Eimas, P. D. (1990). A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 75-86.
121. Oliva, A., and Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput.Vis. 42, 145-175.
122. Pascual-Leone, A., and Walsh, V. (2001). Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 292, 510-512.
123. Pastore, R. E., Schmuckler, M. A., Rosenblum, L., and Szczesiul, R. (1983). Duplex perception with musical stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 469-474.
124. Pearson, J., and Brascamp, J. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 12, 334-341.
125. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., and Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 593-608.
126. Pitt, M. A., and Shoaf, L. (2002). Linking verbal transformations to their causes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 150-162.
127. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., and Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 24, 979-992.
128. Pressnitzer, D., and Hupé, J. M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Curr. Biol. 16, 1351-1357.
129. Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., and Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr. Biol. 18, 1124-1128.
130. Rand, T. C. (1974). Dichotic release from masking for speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 678-680.
131. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., and Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 849-860.
132. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annu.Rev.Psychol.53, 245-277.
133. Repp, B. H. (2007). Hearing a melody in different ways: multistability of metrical interpretation, reflected in rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization. Cognition 102, 434-454.
134. Repp, B. H., and Bentin, S. (1984). Parameters of spectral temporal fusion in speech-perception. Percept. Psy- chophys. 36, 523-530.
135. Riecke, L., Mendelsohn, D., Schreiner, C., and Formisano, E. (2009). The continuity illusion adapts to the
136. Riecke, L., Micheyl, C., Vanbussel, M., Schreiner, C. S., Mendelsohn, D., and Formisano, E. (2011). Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects. Hear. Res. 152-162.
137. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. J. (2002). Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2074-2085.
138. Rogers, W. L., and Bregman, A. S. (1993). An experimental evaluation of three theories of auditory stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 53, 179-189.
139. Sato, M., Baciu, M., Loevenbruck, H., Schwartz, J. L., Cathiard, M. A., Segebarth, C., and Abry, C. (2004). Multistable representation of speech forms: a functional MRI study of verbal transformations. Neuroimage 23, 1143-1151.
140. Sato, M., Schwartz, J. L., Abry, C., Cathiard, M. A., and Loevenbruck, H. (2006). Multistable syllables as enacted percepts: a source of an asymmetric bias in the verbal transformation effect. Percept. Psy- chophys. 68, 458-474.
141. Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., and Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 853-862.
142. Schadwinkel, S., and Gutschalk, A. (2011). Transient BOLD activity locked to perceptual reversals of auditory streaming in human auditory cortex and inferior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 1977-1983.
143. Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., and Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends Neurosci. 34, 114-123.
144. Shen, D., and Alain, C. (2010). Neuroelectric correlates of auditory attentional blink. Psychophysiology 47, 184-191.
145. Shen, D., andAlain, C. (2011). Temporal attention facilitates short-term consolidation during a rapid serial auditory presentation task. Exp. Brain Res. 215, 285-292.
146. Shen, D., and Mondor, T. A. (2006). Effect of distractor sounds on the auditory attentional blink. Percept. Psychophys. 68, 228-243.
147. Shen, D., and Mondor, T. A. (2008). Object file continuity and the auditory attentional blink. Percept. Psy- chophys. 70, 896-915.
148. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 12, 182-186.
149. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Lee, A. K. C., and Babcock, S. (2008). Measuring the perceived content of auditory objects using a matching paradigm. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9, 388-397.
150. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Lee, A. K. C., and Oxenham, A. J. (2007). A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 12223-12227.
151. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., and Schwartz, A. H. (2010). Dissociation of perceptual judgments of "what" and "where" in an ambiguous auditory scene. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3041-3051.
152. Simons, D. J., and Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 16-20.
153. Sinnett, S., Costa, A., and Soto-Faraco, S. (2006). Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 1425-1442.
154. Snyder, J. S., and Alain, C. (2007). Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychol. Bull. 133, 780-799.
155. Snyder, J. S., Alain, C., and Picton, T. W. (2006). Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation. J. Cogn. Neu- rosci. 18, 1-13.
156. Snyder, J. S., Carter, O. L., Hannon, E. E., and Alain, C. (2009a). Adaptation reveals multiple levels of representation in auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1232-1244.
157. Snyder, J. S., Holder, W. T., Weintraub, D. M., Carter, O. L., and Alain, C. (2009b). Effects of prior stimulus and prior perception on neural correlates of auditory stream segregation. Psychophysiology 46, 1208-1215.
158. Snyder, J. S., Carter, O. L., Lee, S.-K., Hannon, E. E., and Alain, C. (2008). Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 1007-1016.
159. Snyder, J. S., and Gregg, M. K. (2011). Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex scenes. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 1993-2007.
160. Snyder, J. S., and Weintraub, D. M. (2011). Pattern specificity in the effect of prior δf on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1649-1656.
161. Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., Fairbank, K., Kingstone, A., Hillstrom, A. P., and Shapiro, K. (2002). A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 731-738.
162. Stainsby, T. H., Moore, B. C. J., Medland, P. J., and Glasberg, B. R. (2004). Sequential streaming and effective level differences due to phase-spectrum manipulations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1665-1673.
163. Stoerig, P., and Cowey, A. (1997). Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain 120, 535-559.
164. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., and Vaughan, H. G. (1999). An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psy- chophysiology 36, 22-34.
165. Sussman, E. S., Horváth, J., Winkler, I., and Orr, M. (2007). The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 136-152.
166. Teki, S., Chait, M., Kumar, S., Von Kriegstein, K., and Griffiths, T. D. (2011). Brain bases for auditory stimulusdriven figure-ground segregation. J. Neurosci. 31, 164-171.
167. Thompson, S. K., Carlyon, R. P., and Cusack, R. (2011). An objective measurement of the build-up of auditory streaming and of its modulation by attention. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1253-1262.
168. Toiviainen, P., and Snyder, J. S. (2003). Tapping to Bach: resonance-based modeling of pulse. Music Percept. 21, 43-80.
169. Tong, F., Meng, M., and Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 10, 502-511.
170. Tremblay, S., Vachon, F., and Jones, D. M. (2005). Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 195-208.
171. Tuller, B., Ding, M. Z., and Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Fractal timing of verbal transforms. Perception 26, 913-928.
172. Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragmentbased hierarchy. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11, 58-64.
173. Vachon, F., and Tremblay, S. (2005). Auditory attentional blink: masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 279-286.
174. van Ee, R., Van Boxtel, J. J. A., Parker, A. L., and Alais, D. (2009). Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection. J. Neurosci. 29, 11641-11649.
175. Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Tem- poral Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
176. Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 333-342.
177. Warren, R. M. (1968). Verbal transformation effect and auditory perceptual mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 70, 261-270.
178. Whalen, D. H., and Liberman, A. M. (1987). Speech-perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science 237, 169-171.
179. Wibral, M., Bledowski, C., Kohler, A., Singer, W., and Muckli, L. (2009). The timing of feedback to early visual cortex in the perception of long-range apparent motion. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1567-1582.
180. Xiang, J. J., Simon, J., and Elhilali, M. (2010). Competing streams at the cocktail party: exploring the mechanisms of attention and temporal integration. J. Neurosci. 30, 12084-12093.
181. Zhang, D., Shao, L., Nieuwenstein, M., and Zhou, X. (2008). Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 287-295.