Auditory attentional blink: Masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 279-286

  Vachon, François ^a   Tremblay, Sébastien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 33644870570     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087480     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arnell, K. M. (2001). Cross-modal interactions in dual-task paradigms. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention. Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 141-177). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Arnell, K. M., & Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105-147.
3. Arnell, K. M., & Jenkins, R. (2004). Revisiting within modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of targetdistractor similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1147-1161.
4. Arnell, K. M., & Larson, J. M. (2002). A cross-modal attentional blink without preparatory task-set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 497-506.
5. Brehaut, J. C., Enns, J. T., Di Lollo, V. (1999). Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1436-1448.
6. Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
7. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
8. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention. Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 20-35). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Dell'Acqua, R., Pascali, A., Jolicceur, P., & Sessa, P. (2003). Four-dot masking produces the attentional blink. Vision Research, 43, 1907-1913.
10. Enns, J. T., Visser, T. A. W., Kawahara, J., & Di Lollo, V. (2001). Visual masking and task switching in the attentional blink. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention. Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 65-81). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454-1466.
12. Grandison, T. D., Ghirardelli, T. G., & Egeth, H. E. (1997). Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 266-274.
13. 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
14. Jolicceur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616.
15. Jolicceur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
16. Kallman, H. J., & Morris, M. D. (1984). Backward recognition masking as a function of ear of mask presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 379-384.
17. Massaro, D. W., & Kahn, B. J. (1973). Effects of central processing on auditory recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 51-58.
18. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203220.
19. McLaughlin, E. N., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 169-196.
20. Mondor, T. A. (1998). A transient processing deficit following selection of an auditory target. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 5, 305-311.
21. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B, S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979-992.
22. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
23. Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1061-1073.
24. Tremblay, S., Vachon, E, & Jones, D. M. (2005). Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 195-208.
25. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 739-743.