The importance of semantics in auditory representations

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 607-619

  Gregg, Melissa K ^a   Samuel, Arthur G ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONFLICT; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTICS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 65549160994     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.3.607     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1992). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.2) [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved October 2005 from www.praat.org.
2. Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19, 678-685.
3. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Carlyon, R. P. (2004). How the brain separates sounds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465-471.
5. Castelhano, M. S., Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040.
6. Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
7. Clarey, J. C., Barone, P., & Imig, T. J. (1992). Physiology of thalamus and cortex. In A. N. Popper & R. R. Fay (Eds.), The mammalian auditory pathway: Neurophysiology (pp. 232-334). New York: Springer.
8. Dannenbring, G. L., & Bregman, A. S. (1976). Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 544-555.
9. Eramudugolla, R., Irvine, D. R. F., McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Directed attention eliminates "change deafness" in complex auditory scenes. Current Biology, 15, 1108-1113.
10. Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (1996). What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
11. Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 26, 136-150.
12. Gregg, M. K., & Samuel, A. G. (2008). Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 34, 974-991.
13. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 89-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2007). Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 839-855.
15. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
16. Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 388-403.
17. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 28, 113-136.
18. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768.
19. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
20. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
21. Kat, D., & Samuel, A. G. (1984). More adaptation of speech by non-speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 512-525.
22. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
23. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the " real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
24. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211.
25. O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
26. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. L. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of " mudsplashes." Nature, 398, 34.
27. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
28. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 199-210.
29. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
30. Samuel, A. G., & Newport, E. L. (1979). Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 563-578.
31. Shafiro, V., & Gygi, B. (2004). How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 590-598.
32. Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48.
33. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
34. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649.
35. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
36. Treisman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
37. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
38. Treisman, A. (1992). Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist, 47, 862-875.
39. Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.
40. Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). Change deafness: The inability to detect changes between two voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 333-342.
41. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92-114.
42. Warren, R. M., Obusek, C. J., & Ackroff, J. M. (1972). Auditory induction: Perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science, 176, 1149-1151.