Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: Sensory and decisional effects

Hearing Research

Volumn 277, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 152-162

  Riecke, Lars ^a   Micheyl, Christophe ^b   Vanbussel, Mieke ^a   Schreiner, Claudia S ^c   Mendelsohn, Daniel ^d   Formisano, Elia ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^d WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BINAURAL HEARING; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SENSORY GATING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CUES; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960270863     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Aravamudhan R., Lotto A.J., Hawks J.W. Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: the role of auditory categories. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 124:1695-1703.
2. Bartlett E.L., Wang X. Long-lasting modulation by stimulus context in primate auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:83-104.
3. Bashford J.A., Warren R.M. Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction. Percept Psychophys 1987, 42:114-121.
4. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R Stat. Soc. 1995, B57:289-300.
5. Bennett K.B., Parasuraman R., Howard J.H., O'Toole A.J. Auditory induction of discrete tones in signal detection tasks. Percept Psychophys 1984, 35:570-578.
6. Braaten R.F., Leary J.C. Temporal induction of missing Birdsong segments in European starlings. Psychol. Sci. 1999, 10:162-166.
7. Bregman A.S. Auditory streaming is cumulative. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1978, 4:380-387.
8. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge.
9. Bregman A.S., Dannenbring G.L. Auditory continuity and amplitude edges. Can. J. Psychol. 1977, 31:151-159.
10. Brosch M., Schreiner C.E. Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:923-943.
11. Brown G.S., White K.G. The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability. Behav. Res. Methods 2005, 37:436-449.
12. Ciocca V., Bregman A.S. Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise. Percept Psychophys 1987, 42:476-484.
13. Condon C.D., Weinberger N.M. Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex. Behav. Neurosci 1991, 105:416-430.
14. Davis K.A. Contralateral effects and binaural interactions in dorsal cochlear nucleus. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6:280-296.
15. Diehl R.L., Elman J.L., McCusker S.B. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1978, 4:599-609.
16. Eimas P.D., Corbit J.D. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cogn. Psychol. 1973, 4:99-109.
17. Elman J.L. Perceptual origins of the phoneme boundary effect and selective adaptation to speech: a signal detection theory analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1979, 65:190-207.
18. Fechner G. Elements of Psychophysics Holt 1960, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
19. Frissen I., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Bertelson P. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: are they sound-frequency specific?. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2003, 113:315-327.
20. Frissen I., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Bertelson P. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: generalization across sound-frequencies. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2005, 118:93-100.
21. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:535-574.
22. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
23. Green G.G., Kay R.H. Channels in the human auditory system concerned with the wave form of the modulation present in amplitude and frequency-modulated tones. J. Physiol. 1974, 241:29P-30P.
24. Heinrich A., Carlyon R.P., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Illusory vowels resulting from perceptual continuity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1737-1752.
25. Holt L.L. Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16:305-312.
26. Holt L.L. The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:2801-2817.
27. Houtgast T. Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1972, 51:1885-1894.
28. Husain F.T., Lozito T.P., Ulloa A., Horwitz B. Investigating the neural basis of the auditory continuity illusion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:1275-1292.
29. Jesteadt W., Luce R.D., Green D.M. Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1977, 3:92-104.
30. Jones M., Sieck W.R. Learning myopia: an adaptive recency effect in category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2003, 29:626-640.
31. Jones M., Love B.C., Maddox W.T. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2006, 32:316-332.
32. King A.J., Nelken I. Unraveling the principles of auditory cortical processing: can we learn from the visual system?. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:698-701.
33. Kluender K.R., Jenison R.L. Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise. Percept Psychophys 1992, 51:231-238.
34. Komatsu H. The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7:220-231.
35. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 1991, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
36. Malone B.J., Scott B.H., Semple M.N. Context-dependent adaptive coding of interaural phase disparity in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:4625-4638.
37. Mapes-Riordan D., Yost W.A. Loudness recalibration as a function of level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 106:3506-3511.
38. Marks L.E. Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1993, 19:227-249.
39. Micheyl C., Tian B., Carlyon R.P., Rauschecker J.P. Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Neuron 2005, 48:139-148.
40. Micheyl C., Carlyon R.P., Shtyrov Y., Hauk O., Dodson T., Pullvermuller F. The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:747-758.
41. Miller C.T., Dibble E., Hauser M.D. Amodal completion of acoustic signals by a nonhuman primate. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:783-784.
42. Miller G.A., Licklider J.C.R. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1950, 22:167-173.
43. Morgan M.J., McEwan W., Solomon J. The lingering effects of an artificial blind spot. PLoS One 2007, 2:e256.
44. Mori S., Ward L.M. Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Percept Psychophys 1995, 57:1065-1079.
45. Pessoa L., De Weerd P. Filling-in: From Perceptual Completion to Cortical Reorganization 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.
46. Petkov C.I., Sutter M.L. Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration. Hear Res. 2010.
47. Petkov C.I., O'Connor K.N., Sutter M.L. Illusory sound perception in macaque monkeys. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:9155-9161.
48. Petkov C.I., O'Connor K.N., Sutter M.L. Encoding of illusory continuity in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 54:153-165.
49. Petzold P. Distance effects on sequential dependencies in categorical judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1981, 7:1371-1385.
50. Phillips D.P., Hall S.E. Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level. Hear Res. 2005, 202:188-199.
51. Phillips D.P., Hall S.E., Boehnke S.E. Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception. Hear Res. 2002, 167:192-205.
52. Rankin K.M., Marks L.E. Differential context effects in taste perception. Chem. Senses 1991, 16:617-629.
53. Recanzone G.H., Sutter M.L. The biological basis of audition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008, 59:119-142.
54. Riecke L., van Opstal A.J., Goebel R., Formisano E. Hearing illusory sounds in noise: sensory-perceptual transformations in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:12684-12689.
55. Riecke L., Esposito F., Bonte M., Formisano E. Hearing illusory sounds in noise: the timing of sensory-perceptual transformations in auditory cortex. Neuron 2009, 64:550-561.
56. Riecke L., Mendelsohn D., Schreiner C., Formisano E. The continuity illusion adapts to the auditory scene. Hear Res. 2009, 247:71-77.
57. Samuel A.G. Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. J. Exp. Psychol 1981, 110:474-494.
58. Samuel A.G. Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cogn. Psychol. 1997, 32:97-127.
59. Samuel A.G., Kat D. Adaptation is automatic. Percept Psychophys 1998, 60:503-510.
60. Sawusch J.R., Jusczyk P. Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 1981, 7:408-421.
61. Scharf B., Buus S., Nieder B. Loudness enhancement: induced loudness reduction in disguise? (L). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 112:807-810.
62. Schellenberg E.G., Trehub S.E. Frequency ratios and the discrimination of pure tone sequences. Percept Psychophys 1994, 56:472-478.
63. Schifferstein H.N., Frijters J.E. Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Percept Psychophys 1992, 52:243-255.
64. Schreiner C. Encoding of alternating acoustical signals in the medial geniculate body of guinea pigs. Hear Res. 1980, 3:265-278.
65. Schweinberger S.R., Casper C., Hauthal N., Kaufmann J.M., Kawahara H., Kloth N., Robertson D.M., Simpson A.P., Zaske R. Auditory adaptation in voice perception. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:684-688.
66. Seeba F., Klump G.M. Stimulus familiarity affects perceptual restoration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). PLoS One 2009, 4:e5974.
67. Sekuler R., Blake R. Perception 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York.
68. Shahin A.J., Bishop C.W., Miller L.M. Neural mechanisms for illusory filling-in of degraded speech. Neuroimage 2009, 44:1133-1143.
69. Shepard R.N. Stimulus and response generalization: a stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika 1957, 22:325-345.
70. Shimojo S., Kamitani Y., Nishida S. Afterimage of perceptually filled-in surface. Science 2001, 293:1677-1680.
71. Simon H.J., Studdert-Kennedy M. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 64:1338-1357.
72. Sivonen P., Maess B., Lattner S., Friederici A.D. Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: evidence from early and late ERP effects. Brain Res. 2006, 1121:177-189.
73. Snyder J.S., Carter O.L., Hannon E.E., Alain C. Adaptation reveals multiple levels of representation in auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 2009, 35:1232-1244.
74. Snyder J.S., Carter O.L., Lee S.K., Hannon E.E., Alain C. Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform. 2008, 34:1007-1016.
75. Snyder J.S., Holder W.T., Weintraub D.M., Carter O.L., Alain C. Effects of prior stimulus and prior perception on neural correlates of auditory stream segregation. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1208-1215.
76. Stewart N., Brown G.D., Chater N. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2002, 28:3-11.
77. Sugita Y. Neuronal correlates of auditory induction in the cat cortex. Neuroreport 1997, 8:1155-1159.
78. Tansley B.W., Suffield J.B. Time course of adaptation and recovery of channels selectively sensitive to frequency and amplitude modulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1983, 74:765-775.
79. Thurlow W. An auditory figure-ground effect. Am. J. Psychol. 1957, 70:653-654.
80. Treisman M. A theory of criterion setting: an alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. J. Exp. Psychol 1984, 113:443-463.
81. Ulanovsky N., Las L., Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:391-398.
82. Ulanovsky N., Las L., Farkas D., Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:10440-10453.
83. Verplanck W.S., Collier G.H., Cotton J.W. Nonindependence of successive responses in measurements of the visual threshold. J. Exp. Psychol. 1952, 44:273-282.
84. Verschuure J., Brocaar M.P. Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise. Percept Psychophys 1983, 33:232-240.
85. Wakefield G.H., Viemeister N.F. Selective adaptation to linear frequency-modulated sweeps: evidence for direction-specific FM channels?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 75:1588-1592.
86. Ward L.M., Lockhead G.R. Response system processes in absolute judgment. Percept Psychophys 1971, 9:73-78.
87. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 1970, 167:392-393.
88. Warren R.M. Auditory Perception: A New Analysis and Synthesis 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
89. Warren R.M., Obusek C.J., Ackroff J.M. Auditory induction: perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science 1972, 176:1149-1151.
90. Werner-Reiss U., Porter K.K., Underhill A.M., Groh J.M. Long lasting attenuation by prior sounds in auditory cortex of awake primates. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 168:272-276.
91. Wickens T.D. Elementary Signal Detection Theory 2002, Oxford University Press, New York.