Citizens' attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 346-368

  Nam, Taewoo ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

citizen attitudes; e government; Government 2.0; Open Government; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SERVICE; GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862229938     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: 14617226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852312438783     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akman İ,Yazici A,Mishra A,Arifoglu A.E-government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens.Government Information Quarterly. 2005;22 (2): 239-257.
2. Anttiroiko ACitizens and E-government: Evaluating Policy and Management. Reddick CG, ed. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing; 2010:110-130.
3. Becker J, Niehaves B, Bergener P and Räckers M (2008) Digital divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion gap model. In: Wimmer MA, Scholl HJ and Ferro E (eds) Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, EGOV 2008. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 231-242.
4. Bélanger F and Carter L (2006a) The effects of the digital divide on e-government: An empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39), Kauai, Hawaii, 4-7 January.
5. Bélanger F,Carter L.The impact of the digital divide on e-government use.Communications of the ACM. 2006b;52 (4): 132-135.
6. Bennett CJ.How states utilize foreign evidence.Journal of Public Policy. 1991a;11 (1): 31-54.
7. Bennett CJ.Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it?.British Journal of Political Science. 1991b;21 (2): 215-233.
8. Bennett CJ.Understanding ripple effects: The cross-national adoption of policy instruments.Governance. 1997;10 (3): 213-233.
9. Bertot JC,Jaeger PT,Shuler JA,Simmons SN,Grimes JM.Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education.Government Information Quarterly. 2009;26 (3): 433-436.
10. Bertot JC,Jaeger PT,Grimes JM.Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies.Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27 (3): 264-271.
11. Birkinshaw P.Freedom of information.Parliamentary Affairs. 1997;50 (1): 164-181.
12. Brant R.Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.Biometrics. 1990;46 (4): 1171-1178.
13. Carter L,Bélanger F.The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on e-government adoption.Electronic Journal of e-Government. 2005;2 (1): 11-20.
14. Cho H,Hwang SPolitics, Democracy and E-government: Participation and Service Delivery. Reddick CG, ed. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing; 2010:94-114.
15. Cronbach LJ.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
16. Dawes SS.The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance.Public Administration Review. 2008;68 (Supplement 1): S86-S102.
17. Dawes SS.Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future.Government Information Quarterly. 2009;26 (2): 257-264.
18. Dawes SS.Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency.Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27 (4): 377-383.
19. Dawes SS and Helbig N (2010) Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Presented at the 9th International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) WG 8.5 International Conference (EGOV 2010), Lausanne, Switzerland, 29 August-2 September.
20. DiMaio A (2009) Government 2.0: A Gartner definition. Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/11/13/government-2-0-a-gartner-definition/.
21. Eggers WDGovernment 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield; 2005:.
22. Ferro E,Molinari F.Framing Web 2.0 in the process of public sector innovation: Going down the participation ladder.European Journal of ePractice. 2009;9 (1): 20-34.
23. Goldfinch S.Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector.Public Administration Review. 2007;67 (5): 917-929.
24. Goldfinch S,Gauld R,Herbison P.The participation divide? Political participation, trust in government, and e-government in Australia and New Zealand.Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2009;68 (3): 333-350.
25. Golembiewski RT,Gabris G.Tomorrow's city management: Guides for avoiding success-becoming-failure.Public Administration Review. 1995;55 (3): 240-246.
26. Holzer M,Halachmi A.Measurement as a means of accountability.International Journal of Public Administration. 1996;19 (11/12): 1921-1944.
27. Jaeger PT,Thompson KM.E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions.Government Information Quarterly. 2003;20 (4): 389-394.
28. Kolsaker A,Lee-Kelley L.Citizens' attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study.International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2008;21 (7): 723-738.
29. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. Lathrop DRuma L, ed. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media; 2010:.
30. Layne K,Lee J.Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model.Government Information Quarterly. 2001;18 (2): 12-36.
31. Long JSRegression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997:.
32. McDermott P.Building open government.Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27 (4): 401-413.
33. Millard J.Government 1.5: Is the bottle half full or half empty?.European Journal of ePractice. 2009;9 (1): 35-50.
34. Mintz D.Government 2.0: Fact or fiction?.Public Manager. 2008;36 (4): 21-24.
35. Moon MJ.The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?.Public Administration Review. 2002;62 (4): 424-433.
36. Mossberger K,Tolbert CJ,McNeal RSDigital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:.
37. Mossberger K,Tolbert CJ,Stansbury MVirtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2003:.
38. Nam T (2012) Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly 29(1): 12-20.
39. Niehaves B and Becker J (2008) The age-divide in e-government: Data, interpretations, theory fragments. Paper presented at the 8th IFIP Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society (I3E 2008), Tokyo, Japan, 24-26 September.
40. Why People Don't Trust Government. Nye JSZelikow PDKing DC, ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1997:.
41. Osimo D.Editorial: Government 2.0 - hype, hope, or reality?.European Journal of ePractice. 2009;9 (1): 2-4.
42. Parks W.The open government principle: Applying the right to know under the constitution.George Washington Law Review. 1957;26 (1): 1-22.
43. Parycek P,Sachs M.Open government: Information flow in Web 2.0.European Journal of ePractice. 2009;9 (1): 59-70.
44. Peters BGAmerican Public Policy: Promise and Performance. 2009) American Public Policy: Promise and Performance, 8th edn. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2009:.
45. Putnam RDBowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone; 2000:.
46. Reddick CG.Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?.Government Information Quarterly. 2004a;22 (1): 38-57.
47. Reddick CG.A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for US cities.Government Information Quarterly. 2004b;21 (1): 51-64.
48. Rose-Ackerman S.Corruption and government.International Peacekeeping. 2008;15 (3): 328-343.
49. Sipior JC,Ward BT.Bridging the digital divide for e-government inclusion: A United States case study.Electronic Journal of e-Government. 2005;3 (3): 137-146.
50. Sweeney ADP.Electronic government-citizen relationships: Exploring citizen perspectives.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2007;4 (2): 101-116.
51. Tapscott D, Williams AD and Herman D (2008) Government 2.0: Transforming Government and Governance for the Twenty-first Century. Available at: http://www.newparadigm.com/media/gov_transforminggovernment.pdf.
52. Tolbert CJ and Mossberger K (2003) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Paper presented at the Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2003), Boston, 18-21 May.
53. Van de Walle S,van Roosbroek S,Bouckaert G.Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline?.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2008;74 (1): 47-64.
54. Wangpipatwong S,Chutimaskul W,Papasratorn B.Understanding citizens' continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy.Electronic Journal of e-Government. 2008;6 (1): 55-64.
55. Warkentin M,Gefen D,Pavlou PA,Rose GM.Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust.Electronic Markets. 2002;12 (3): 157-162.
56. Welch EW,Hinnant CC,Moon MJ.Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005;15 (3): 371-391.
57. West DM.E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes.Public Administration Review. 2004;64 (1): 15-27.
58. Wolman H.Understanding cross national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the US.Governance. 1992;5 (1): 27-45.
59. Yong JS,Koon LE-government in Asia: Enabling Public Service Innovation in the 21st Century. Yong JS, ed. Singapore: Times Media; 2005:3-21.
60. Zukin C,Keeter S,Andolina M,Jenkins K,Delli Carpini MXA New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:.