Government 2.0 in Korea: Focusing on e-participation services

Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 94-114

  Cho, Hee Jung ^a   Hwang, Sungsoo ^b  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952981905     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-933-0.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. ACRC. (2009). A report on civil petition operation assessment of 2008 [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission.
2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
3. Barry, B. (1970). Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago.
4. Bell, D. (1976). The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
5. Berry, J. M. (2005). Nonprofits and Civic Engagement. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 568- 578. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00484.x
6. Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2005). The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547-558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
7. Blumler, J. G., & Coleman, S. (2001). Realising Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace. IPPR/Citizens Online.
8. Boyte, H. C. (2005). Reframing Democracy: Governance, Civic Agency, and Politics. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 536-546. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x
9. Brown, D. (2005). Electronic government and public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 241-254. doi:10.1177/0020852305053883
10. Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). Digital Collaboration: Clarifying the Roles of E-Government and E-Governance. Paper presented at the American Society of Public Administration.
11. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-Democracy Back In: Why it Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. 21(4), 443-455.
12. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-Governance and Smart Communities: A Social Learning Challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80-93. doi:10.1177/089443930101900107
13. Coglianese, C. (2004). E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process. Administrative Law Review, 56, 353-402.
14. Coleman, S. (2001). 2001: A Cyber Space Oddyseythe Internet in the UK Election. London: Hansard Society.
15. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling Together:Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
16. Cooper, T. L. (2005). Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century: Toward a Scholarly and Practical Agenda. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 534-535. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00480.x
17. Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). The Impacts of Information Technology on Public Administration: An Analysis of Empirical Research from the 'Golden Age' of Transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591. doi:10.1081/PAD-120003292
18. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
19. Dulio, D. A., Goff, D. L., & Thurber, J. A. (1999). Untangled Web: Internet use during the 1998 election.(World Wide Web). PS: Political Science & Politics, 32(1).
20. Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207-235. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004
21. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22. Fountain, J. E., & Osorio-Urzua, C. A. (2001). Public Sector: Early stage of a deep transformation. In R. E. Litan & A. M. Rivlin (Eds.), The economic payoff from the internet revolution (pp. 235-268). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Freedom of Information Act (United States). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Retrieved April 1, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29
23. GartnerGroup. (2007). What does Web 2.0 mean to Government? Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265.
24. Kathi, P. C., & Cooper, T. L. (2005). Democratizing the Administrative State: Connecting Neighborhood Councils and City Agencies. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 559-567. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00483.x
25. Kim, H.-J., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2008). Making the Connection between Local Electronic-Government Development Stages and Collaboration Strategy: A Case Study of Gangnam District, Seoul, Korea. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(3), 36-56.
26. Kim, P. (2004, 14-18 July 2004). Development of Democratic e-Governance in Cyberspace and Shaping e-governance for Quality of Life. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Administrative Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
27. King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317-326. doi:10.2307/977561
28. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lin, N., Cook, K. S., & Burt, R. S. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30. Macintosh, A. (2002). e-Democracy: Citizen engagement and evaluation. In S. Friedrichs, T. Hart & O. Schmidt (Eds.), Balanced EGovernment:Connecting Efficient Administration and Responsive Democracy. Germany: Bertlesman Foundation.
31. Macintosh, A. (2006). eParticipation in Policymaking: the research and the challenges. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham (Eds.), Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications and Case Studies (pp. 364-369) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS press.
32. Macintosh, A., Malina, A., & Whyte, A. (2002). Designing e-democracy for Scotland. Communications: The European Journal of Communications, 27, 261-278.
33. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2006). Evaluating how eParticipation changes local democracy. Paper presented at the eGovernment Workshop 2006, eGov06, London, UK.
34. Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace "revolution". Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. MPAS. (2008). Annual Report on Information Disclosure in 2007 [in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Public Administration and Security.
36. Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? Political Communication, 17(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/105846000198486
37. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital(1st ed.). New York: Knopf.
38. Nie, N., & Verba, S. (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
39. Nie, N., Verba, S., & Kim, J.-O. (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Cross-National Comparison. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40. O'Leary, R., Gerald, C., & Bingham, L. B. (2006). Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review, Supplement to Volume 66(6), 6-9.
41. Parent, M., Vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. (2005). Building Citizen Trust Through E-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 720-736. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.10.001
42. Portney, K. (2005). Civic Engagement and Sustainable Cities in the United States. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 579-591. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00485.x
43. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44. Putnam, R. D. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Riley, T. B. (2003). E-Government vs. E-Governance: Examining the Differences in a Changing Public Sector Climate (No. 4). Ottawa, Canada: Common Wealth Centre for E-Governance.
46. Roberts, A. S. (2000). Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the Weakening Law. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 308-320. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00093
47. Salamon, L. M., & Elliott, O. V. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Scott, J. K. (2006). "E" the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341-353. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00593.x
49. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots; a study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
50. Shulman, S. W. (2005). eRulemaking: Issues in Current Research and Practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 621-641. doi:10.1081/PAD-200064221
51. Snellen, I. T. M. (2002). Electronic governance: implications for citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 183-198. doi:10.1177/0020852302682002
52. Thomas, J. C. (1990). Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory. Public Administration Review, 50(4), 435-445. doi:10.2307/977079
53. Thomas, J. C. (1993). Public Involvement and Government Effectiveness: A Decision-Making Model for Public Managers. Administration & Society, 24(4), 444-469. doi:10.1177/009539979302400402
54. Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. New York: Jossey-Bass.
55. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory: J-PART, 13(1), 83 (19).
56. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave(1st ed.). New York: Morrow.
57. Webler, T., & O'Renn, O. (1995). A Brief Primer on Public Participation: Philosophy and Practice. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
58. Weeks, E. C. (2000). The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Trials. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 360-372. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00098
59. Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). E-Government and Bureaucracy: Toward a Better Understanding of Intranet Implementation and Its Effect on Red Tape. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 17(3), 379-404. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul013
60. Wyld, D. C. (2007). The Blogging Revolution: Government in the Age of Web 2.0. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.