Seed orchard genetics

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Funda, Tomas ^a   El Kassaby, Yousry A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; Genetic gain; Population and quantitative genetics; Seed orchards; Tree breeding; Tree improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862221192     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127013     Document Type: Review

References (296)

1. Zobel BJ, Talbert JT. Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1984.
2. van Buijtenen JP. Strategies for maintaining the genetic base. How will advanced generation tests differ from first? In: Progeny testing: proceedings of Servicewide Genetics Workshop; Charleston, South Carolina, Dec. 5-9, 1983. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D. C., USA; 1984. p. 566-72.
3. Namkoong G, Kang HC, Brouard JS. Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 11. Springer-Verlag, New York; 1988.
4. Burdon RD, Shelbourne C J A. Breeding populations for recurrent selection conflicts and possible solutions. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 1971;1:174-93.
5. White TL. A conceptual framework for tree improvement programs. New Forests 1987;1:325-42.
6. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M. Breeding without breeding. Genetics Research 2009;91:111-20.
7. Ruotsalainen S. Managing breeding stock in the initiation of a long-term tree breeding program [PhD Thesis]. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 875.95+61, 2002.
8. Kang H. Components of a tree breeding plan. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties on Genetics about Breeding Strategies including Multiclonal Varieties, Sensenstein, Germany. Lower Saxony Forest Research Institute, Department of Forest Tree Breeding, Staufenberg-Escherode, Germany; 1982. p. 119135.
9. Kang H, Nienstaedt H. Managing long-term tree breeding stock. Silvae Genetica 1987;36:30-9.
10. Stonecypher RW. Recurrent selection in forest tree breeding. In Proceedings of Southern Conference on Forest Tree Improvement, Houston, TX; 1969. p. 7-16.
11. Gullberg U, Kang H. Application of a model for tree breeding to conifers in southern Sweden. Studia Forestalia Suecica 1985:1-8.
12. Eriksson G, Ekberg I, Clapham D. An Introduction to Forest Genetics, 2nd edn. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; 2006.
13. Ruotsalainen S, Lindgren D. Stratified sublining: a new option for structuring breeding populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2000;30:596-604. (Pubitemid 30400106)
14. Allard RW. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1960.
15. El-Kassaby YA. Domestication and genetic diversity - should we be concerned? Forestry Chronicle 1992;68:687-700. (Pubitemid 24411257)
16. Zobel BJ, Barber J, Brown CL, Perry TO. Seed orchards - their concept and management. Journal of Forestry 1958;56:815-25.
17. Feilberg L, Soegaard B. Historical Review of Seed Orchards. Forestry Committee Bulletin 54. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, UK; 1975.
18. El-Kassaby YA. Effect of forest tree domestication on gene pools. In: Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T editors. Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), CSIRO Publishing-CABI Publishing; Canberra, Australia; 2000. p. 197-213.
19. Smith RF, Adam C I G. A Manual for Managing Conifer Seed Orchards in Eastern Canada. Forest Genetics Ontario; 2003.
20. Schreiner EJ. Clonal or seedling seed orchards? In Ninth Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference; Syracuse, New York, USA; 1961. p. 53-7.
21. Schreiner EJ. Genetics in relation to forestry. Journal of Forestry 1950;48:33-8.
22. Nanson A. The provenance seedling seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1972;21:243-8.
23. El-Kassaby YA, Cappa EP, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klap Sate J, Lstiburek M. Breeding without breeding: Is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding? PLoS ONE, 2011;6:e25737.
24. Hodge GR, White TL. Advanced-generation wind-pollinated seed orchard design. New Forests 1993;7:213-36.
25. Burdon RD, Kumar S. Forwards versus backwards selection: trade-offs between expected genetic gain and risk avoidance. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 2004;34:3-21. (Pubitemid 39519862)
26. Ruotsalainen S, Lindgren D. Predicting genetic gain of backward and forward selection in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genetica 1998;47:42-50. (Pubitemid 28343753)
27. El-Kassaby YA, Askew GR. Seed orchards and their genetics. In: Mandal AK, Gibson GL editors. Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding. CBS Publishers and Distributors, Daryaganj, New Delhi; 1998. p. 103-111.
28. Toda R. A brief review and conclusion of the discussion on seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1964;13:1-4.
29. Kang K-S. Genetic gain and gene diversity of seed orchard crops [PhD Thesis]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria; 2001.
30. Copes DL. Genetics of graft rejection in Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1974;4:186-92.
31. Baradat P. A method for evaluating consanguinity among plants from 1st generation seed orchards. III. Application and optimization of an economic alternative to elite clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1987;36:134-44.
32. Eriksson G, Jonsson A, Lindgren D. Flowering in a clone trial of Picea abies. Studia Forestalia Suecica 1973;1-45.
33. Hardy GH. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 1908;28:49-50.
34. Weinberg W. Ober den Nachweis der Vererbung beim Menschen. Jahreshefte des Vereins fur vaterlandische Naturkunde in Wurttemberg 1908;64:368-82.
35. El-Kassaby YA. Genetics of Douglas-fir seed orchards: expectations and realities. In Proceedings from the 20th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Charleston, SC; 1989.
36. Askew GR. Estimation of gamete pool compositions in clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1988;37:227-32.
37. Matziris DI. Genetic variation in the phenology of flowering in black pine. Silvae Genetica 1994;43:321-8.
38. Edwards D G W, El-Kassaby YA. The biology and management of coniferous forest seeds: Genetic perspectives. Forestry Chronicle 1996;72:481-4.
39. Burczyk J, Nikkanen T, Lewandowski A. Evidence of an unbalanced mating pattern in a seed orchard composed of two larch species. Silvae Genetica 1997;46:176-81. (Pubitemid 27433930)
40. Kjr ED, Wellendorf H. Studies on the effect of unequal flowering on the effective population number in Danish seed orchard crops. Forest Tree Improvement 1998;26:1-9.
41. Gitimbry D, Bruchanik R, Longauer R. Fertility variation and flowering asynchrony in Pin us sylvestris: consequences for the genetic structure of progeny in seed orchards. Forest Ecology and Management 2003;174:117-26. (Pubitemid 36234157)
42. Hunt J, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R. What is genetic quality? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004;19:329-33. (Pubitemid 38729835)
43. Dawkins R. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1982.
44. Neff BD, Pitcher TE. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 2005;14:19-38. (Pubitemid 40141473)
45. Toro M, Perez-Enciso M. Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 1990;22:93-107.
46. Wray NR, Goddard ME. Increasing long-term response to selection. Genetics Selection Evolution 1994;26:431-51. (Pubitemid 2144782)
47. Brisbane JR, Gibson JP. Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic-relationships in selection decisions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1995;91:421-31.
48. Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genetica 1997;46:124-29. (Pubitemid 27433920)
49. Meuwissen T H E. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 1997;75:934-40. (Pubitemid 127441682)
50. Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Optimization of breeding programmes under index selection and constrained inbreeding. Genetical Research 1997;69:145-58. (Pubitemid 27356698)
51. Funda T, Lstiburek M, Lachout P, Klap Sate J, El-Kassaby Y. Optimization of combined genetic gain and diversity for collection and deployment of seed orchard crops. Tree Genetics and Genomes 2009;5:583-93.
52. Rosvall O. Enhancing gain from long-term forest tree breeding while conserving genetic diversity [PhD Thesis]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria; 1999. p. 109.
53. Caballero A, Santiago E, Toro MA. Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science 1996;62:431-42.
54. Quinton M, Smith C. Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 1995;73:2208-12.
55. Falconer DS, Mackay T F C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longmans Green, Harlow, Essex, UK; 1996.
56. Stoehr M, Webber J, Woods J. Protocol for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia: quantifying genetic gain and diversity. Forestry 2004;77:297-303. (Pubitemid 39404087)
57. St. Clair JB. Evaluating realized genetic gains from tree improvement. In: Burkhart HE, Gregoire TG, Smith JL editors. Proceedings from the IUFRO S401 Conference on Modelling Stand Response to Silvicultural Practices. Natural Resources Publication FWS-1-93 of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA; 1993. p. 145-57.
58. Stoehr MU, Orvar BL, Vo TM, Gawley JR, Webber JE, Newton CH. Application of a chloroplast DNA marker in seed orchard management evaluations of Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1998;28:187-95.
59. Lindgren D, Cui JG, Son SG, Sonesson J. Balancing seed yield and breeding value in clonal seed orchards. New Forests 2004;28:11-22. (Pubitemid 38871846)
60. Avise JC, Hamrick JL. Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY; 1996.
61. Reed DH, Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 2003;17:230-7. (Pubitemid 36234415)
62. Hedrick PW. Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2001;16:629-36. (Pubitemid 32947023)
63. Fisher RA. In: Henry Bennett editor. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection-A Complete Variorum Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1999.
64. Wallace B. Basic Population Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York; 1981.
65. Edwards A W F. The fundamental theorem of naturalselection. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1994;69:443-74.
66. Hedrick PW. Genetics of Populations, 3rd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Boston, MA; 2005.
67. Vignal A, Milan D, San Cristobal M, Eggen A. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genetics Selection Evolution 2002;34:275-305. (Pubitemid 34774107)
68. Vendramin GG, Hansen OK. Molecular markers for characterizing diversity in forest trees. In: Geburek T, Turok J editors. Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia; 2005. p. 337-68.
69. Malecot G. Les mathematiques de l'heredite. Masson, Paris; 1948.
70. Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA; 1990.
71. Cockerham C. Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 1967;56:89-104.
72. Lindgren D, Kang K-S. Status number-a useful tool for tree breeding. Research Report of the Forest Genetic Research Institute of Korea 33; 1997, p. 154-65.
73. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931;16:0097-0159.
74. Crow JF, Kimura M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York; 1970.
75. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. The Theory of Gene Frequencies, Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL; 1969.
76. Begon M, Mortimer M, Thompson DJ. Population Ecology: A Unified Study of Animal and Plants, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1996.
77. Krebs C. Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New York; 2002.
78. Crow JF, Denniston C. Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution 1988;42:482-95.
79. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA; 1998.
80. Keller LF, Waller DM. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002;17:230-41. (Pubitemid 34270584)
81. Karkkainen K, Koski V, Savolainen O. Geographical variation in the inbreeding depression of Scots pine. Evolution 1996;50:111-9.
82. Lindgren D, Jefferson PA, Gea LD. Status number - a measure of genetic diversity. In: Bastien C-J, editor. Evolution of Breeding Strategies for Conifers from the Pacific North West Joint Meeting of the IUFRO Working Parties S20205, 06, 12 and 14, Limoges, France; 1995; BR.9, pp 1-9.
83. Lindgren D, Gea LD, Jefferson PA. Status number for measuring genetic diversity. Forest Genetics 1997;4:69-76.
84. Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1998;28:276-83.
85. Lindgren D, Gea L, Jefferson P. Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica 1996;45:52-9.
86. Lai BS, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klapste J, Van Niejenhuis A, Cook C et al. Pollination dynamics in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction. Annals of Forest Science 2010;67.
87. Funda T, Chen CC, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Kenawy A M A, El-Kassaby YA. Pedigree and mating system analyses in a western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) experimental population. Annals of Forest Science 2008;65:705.
88. Woods JH. Methods for estimating gamete contributions to orchard seed crops and vegetative lots in British Columbia. Technical Report 025. B. C. Ministry of Forests and Range, Research Branch, Victoria, BC; 2005. p. 17.
89. Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Fundova I, Lai B, Walsh C, Van Niejenhuis A et al. Congruence between parental reproductive investment and success determined by DNA-based pedigree reconstruction in conifer seed orchards. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2011;41:380-9.
90. Robertson A. Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genetical Research 1961;2:189-94.
91. Kimura M, Crow JF. Measurement of effective population number. Evolution 1963;17:279.
92. Kang H, Namkoong G. Inbreeding effective population size under some artificial selection schemes. 1. Linear distribution of breeding values. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1988;75:333-9.
93. Woods JH, Stoehr MU, Webber JE. Protocols for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia. Research Report 06. B. C. Ministry of Forests, Forestry Division Services Branch, Victoria, BC; 1996. p. 26.
94. Burrows PM. Inbreeding under selection from unrelated families. Biometrics 1984;40:357-66.
95. Godt M J W, Hamrik JL, Edwards-Burke MA, Williams JH. Comparisons of genetic diversity in white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seed orchards with natural populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001;31:943-9. (Pubitemid 32770105)
96. Chaisurisri K, El-Kassaby YA. Genetic diversity in a seed production population vs natural populations of Sitka spruce. Biodiversity and Conservation 1994;3:512-23. (Pubitemid 2129554)
97. El-Kassaby Y, Ritland K. Impact of selection and breeding on the genetic diversity in Douglas-fir. Biodiversity and Conservation 1996;5:795-813.
98. Stoehr MU, El-Kassaby YA. Levels of genetic diversity at different stages of the domestication cycle of interior spruce in British Columbia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1997;94:83-90. (Pubitemid 27108796)
99. Schmidtling RC, Hipkins V. Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1998;28:1135-45.
100. Hosius B, Bergmann F, Konnert M, Henkel W. A concept for seed orchards based on isoenzyme gene markers. Forest Ecology and Management 2000;131:143-52. (Pubitemid 30351499)
101. Clutton-Brock TH. Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL; 1990.
102. Lindgren D, Matheson AC. An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genetica 1986;35:173-7.
103. Lindgren D, Danusevicius D, Rosvall O. Unequal deployment of clones to seed orchards by considering genetic gain, relatedness and gene diversity. Forestry 2009;82:17-28.
104. Bondesson L, Lindgren D. Optimal utilization of clones and genetic thinning of seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1993;42:157-63.
105. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity 1996;77:251-60.
106. Gregorius HR. Characterisation and Analysis of Mating System. Ekopan Verlag, Germany; 1989. p. 158.
107. Philipson JJ. Predicting cone crop potential in conifers by assessment of developing cone buds and cones. Forestry 1997;70:87-96. (Pubitemid 28003065)
108. Kang KS. Clonal and annual variation of flower production and composition of gamete gene pool in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus densiflora. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2000;30:1275-80.
109. Muona O, Harju A. Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genetica 1989;38:221-8.
110. Schoen DJ, Stewart SC. Variation in male fertilities and pairwise mating probabilities in Picea glauca. Genetics 1987;116:141-52.
111. Grosser C, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE. Microsatellite based paternity analysis in a clonal Eucalyptus nitens seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 2010;59:57-62.
112. Savolainen O, Karkkainen K, Harju A, Nikkanen T, Rusanen M. Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris - a test of sexual allocation theory. American Journal of Botany 1993;80:1016-20.
113. Reynolds S, El-Kassaby YA. Parental balance in Douglas-fir seed orchards-cone crop vs. seed crop. Silvae Genetica 1990;39:40-2.
114. El-Kassaby YA, Cook C. Female reproductive energy and reproductive success in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its impact on genetic diversity. Silvae Genetica 1994;43:243-6.
115. Burczyk J, Prat D. Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) France: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity 1997;79:638-47. (Pubitemid 27526670)
116. Chaix G, Vigneron P, Razafimaharo V, Hamon S. Are phenological observations sufficient to estimate the quality of seed crops from a Eucalyptus grandis open-pollinated seed orchard? Consequences for seed collections. New Forests 2007;33:41-52. (Pubitemid 44900480)
117. Kang KS, Lindgren D. Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1998;47:196-201. (Pubitemid 29000417)
118. El-Kassaby YA, Reynolds S. Reproductive phenology, parental balance, and supplemental mass pollination in a Sitka spruce seed-orchard. Forest Ecology and Management 1990;31:45-54.
119. El-Kassaby YA, Askew GR. The relation between reproductive phenology and reproductive output in determining the gametic pool profile in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Forest Science 1991;37:827-35.
120. Anonymous. Twentieth Annual Report on Cooperative tree Improvement and Hardwood Research Program. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; 1976.
121. O'Reilly C, Parker WH, Barker JE. Effect of pollination period and strobili number on random mating in a clonal seed orchard of Picea mariana. Silvae Genetica 1982;31:90-4.
122. Griffin AR. Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. 1. Some flowering, cone and seed production traits. Australian Forest Research 1982;12:295-302.
123. Schmidtling RC. Genetic variation in fruitfulness in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1983;32:76-80.
124. El-Kassaby YA, Fashler A M K, Crown M. Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its effect on crop-management decisions. Silvae Genetica 1989;38:113-21.
125. Prescher F, Lindgren D, El-Kassaby YA. Is linear deployment of clones optimal under different clonal outcrossing contributions in seed orchards? Tree Genetics and Genomes 2006;2:25-9. (Pubitemid 44197973)
126. Kang KS, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. Prediction of genetic gain and gene diversity in seed orchard crops under alternative management strategies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2001;103:1099-107. (Pubitemid 33132771)
127. Int Seed Test A. International Rules for Seed Testing 1985. Seed Science and Technology 1985;13:299-514.
128. Schoen DJ, Stewart SC. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 1986;40:1109-20.
129. Xie CY, Knowles P. Male fertility variation in an open-pollinated plantation of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1992;22:1463-8. (Pubitemid 23399575)
130. Goto S, Miyahara F, Ide Y. Monitoring male reproductive success in a Japanese black pine clonal seed orchard with RAPD markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2002;32:983-8. (Pubitemid 35409697)
131. Stoehr MU, Newton CH. Evaluation of mating dynamics in a lodgepole pine seed orchard using chloroplast DNA markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2002;32:469-76. (Pubitemid 34294266)
132. Moriguchi Y, Taira H, Tani N, Tsumura Y. Variation of paternal contribution in a seed orchard of Cryptomeria japonica determined using microsatellite markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2004;34:1683-90. (Pubitemid 39501116)
133. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourova AV, Birkes DS, Adams WT. Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Molecular Ecology 2005;14:3109-21.
134. Kjr ED. Estimation of effective population number in a Picea abies (Karst) seed orchard based on flower assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1996;11:111-21.
135. Hansen OK, Nielsen UB. Microsatellites used to establish full pedigree in a half-sib trial and correlation between number of male strobili and paternal success. Annals of Forest Science 2010;67:267-72.
136. Goto S, Watanabe A, Miyahara F, Mon Y. Reproductive success of pollen derived from selected and non-selected sources and its impact on the performance of crops in a nematode-resistant Japanese black pine seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 2005;54:69-76. (Pubitemid 41140809)
137. Moriguchi Y, Tsuchiya S, Iwata H, Itoo S, Tani N, Taira H et al. Factors influencing male reproductive success in a Cryptomeria japonica seed orchard revealed by microsatellite marker analysis. Silvae Genetica 2007;56:207-14. (Pubitemid 350144083)
138. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Lai B S K. Female reproductive success variation in a Pseudotsuga menziesii seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction from a bulk seed collection. Journal of Heredity 2010;101:164-8.
139. Plomion C, LeProvost G, Pot D, Vendramin G, Gerber S, Decroocq S et al. Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001;31:1816-25. (Pubitemid 33023397)
140. Denti D, Schoen DJ. Self-fertilization rates in white spruce - effect of pollen and seed production. Journal of Heredity 1988;79:284-8.
141. Boyer WD. Air temperature, heat sums, and pollen shedding phenology of longleaf pine. Ecology 1973;54:420-6.
142. Worrall J. Temperature-bud-burst relationships in amabilis and subalpine fir provenance tests replicated at different elevations. Silvae Genetica 1983;32:203-9.
143. El-Kassaby YA, Fashler A M K, Sziklai O. Reproductive phenology and its impact on genetically improved seed production in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1984;33:120-5.
144. Blush TD, Bramlett DL, El-Kassaby YA. Reproductive phenology of conifer seed orchards. In: Bramlett DL, Askew GA, Blush TD, Bridgwater FE, Jett JB editors. Advances in Pollen Management. Agriculture Handbook 698. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC; 1993. p. 15-23.
145. El-Kassaby YA. Evaluation of the tree-improvement delivery system-factors affecting genetic potential. Tree Physiology 1995;15:545-50.
146. Fashler A M K, El-Kassaby YA. The effect of water spray cooling treatment on reproductive phenology in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1987;36:245-9.
147. Copes DL, Sniezko RA. The influence of floral bud phenology on the potential mating system of a wind-pollinated Douglas-fir orchard. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1991;21:813-20.
148. Griffin AR. Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. 2. Flowering phenology. Australian Forest Research 1984;14:271-81.
149. Askew GR. Implications of non-synchronous flowering in clonal confier seed orchards. In: Hatcher AV, Weir RJ editors. IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing and Seed Orchards, Williamsburg, Virginia. Tree Improvement Co-operative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; 1986, p. 182-91.
150. Askew GR, Blush TD. An index of phenological overlap in flowering for clonal conifer seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1990;39:168-71.
151. Jonsson A, Ekberg I, Eriksson G. Flowering in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris. Studia Forestalia Suecica 1976;1-38.
152. Nikkanen T. Reproductive phenology in a Norway spruce seed orchard. Silva Fennica 2001;35:39-53. (Pubitemid 32292418)
153. El-Kassaby YA. Phenotypic plasticity in western redcedar. Forest genetics 1999;6:235-40.
154. Crow JF, Simmons MJ. The mutation load in Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Carson HL, Thompson JN editors. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3C. Academic Press, New York; 1983. p. 1-35.
155. Lindgren D, Gregorius HR. Inbreeding and coancestry. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting on Advanced Generation Breeding, Bordeaux, France; 1976. p. 49-69.
156. Williams CG, Hamrick JL, Lewis PO. Multiple-population versus hierarchical conifer breeding programs-a comparison of genetic diversity levels. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1995;90:584-94.
157. Chen Z, Kolb TE, Clancy KM, Hipkins VD, DeWald LE. Allozyme variation in interior Douglas-fir: association with growth and resistance to western spruce budworm herbivory. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001;31:1691-700. (Pubitemid 33023386)
158. Mitton JB. Genetics and the physiological ecology of conifers. Physiological Ecology: Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests 1995;1-36.
159. Burdon RD. Genetic diversity and disease resistance: Some considerations for research, breeding, and deployment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001;31:596-606. (Pubitemid 32752467)
160. de Nettancourt D. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sexual Plant Reproduction 1997;10:185-99. (Pubitemid 27413975)
161. Park YS, Fowler DP. Inbreeding in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill) BSP)-self-fertility, genetic load, and performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1984;14:17-21. (Pubitemid 15273250)
162. Erickson VJ, Adams WT. Mating system variation among individual ramets in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1990;20:1672-75.
163. Sorensen FC. The roles of polyembryony and embryo viability in the genetic system of conifers. Evolution 1982;36:725-33.
164. Squillace AE, Kraus JF. The degree of natural selfing in slash pine as estimated from albino frequencies. Silvae Genetica 1963;12:46-50.
165. Samuel C J A, B. RC, Fletcher AM. A diallel cross in sitka spruce: assessment of first year characters in an early glasshouse test. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1972;42:53-61.
166. Snyder EB. Five-year performance of self-pollinated slash pines. Forest Science 1972;18:246-57.
167. Orr-Ewing AL. The Incidence of Dwarfing in Inbred Douglas-fir. B. C. Forestry Service Research Note 64. B. C. Ministry of Forests and Range, Research Branch, Victoria, BC; 1974, p. 26.
168. Sorensen FC, Franklin JF, Woollard R. Self-pollination effects on seed and seedling traits in noble fir. Forest Science 1976;22:155-9.
169. Griffin AR, Lindgren D. Effect of inbreeding on production of filled seed in Pinus radiata-experimental results and a model of gene action. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1985;71:334-43.
170. Geburek T. Some results of inbreeding depression in Serbian spruce (Picea omorika (Panc) Purk). Silvae Genetica 1986;35:169-72.
171. Woods JH, Heaman JC. Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1989;19:54-9.
172. Morgante M, Vendramin GG, Rossi P, Olivieri AM. Selection against inbreds in early life-cycle phases in Pinus leucodermis Ant. Heredity 1993;70:622-27. (Pubitemid 24413809)
173. Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D. Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. I. The effect of inbreeding on growth, survival and variance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1998;97:1256-68. (Pubitemid 29009988)
174. Koelewijn HP, Koski V, Savolainen O. Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Evolution 1999;53:758-68. (Pubitemid 29332409)
175. Sorensen FC. Relationship between self-fertility, allocation of growth, and inbreeding depression in three coniferous species. Evolution 1999;53:417-25. (Pubitemid 29239714)
176. Wang TL, Hagqvist R, Tigerstedt P M A. Inbreeding depression in three generations of selfed families of silver birch (Betula pendula). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1999;29:662-8. (Pubitemid 29392033)
177. Johnsen K, Major JE, Maier CA. Selfing results in inbreeding depression of growth but not of gas exchange of surviving adult black spruce trees. Tree Physiology 2003;23:1005-08. (Pubitemid 37274379)
178. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP. Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 1988;37:124-31.
179. Hardner CM, Potts BM. Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genetica 1995;44:46-54.
180. Hardner CM, Tibbits W. Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. Forest Genetics 1998;5:11-20.
181. Chaix G, Vigneron P, Razafimaharo V, Hamon S. Improved management of Malagasy Eucalyptus grandis seed orchards using microsatellites and paternity assignment. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2010;22:271-80.
182. Williams CG, Savolainen O. Inbreeding depression in conifers: Implications for breeding strategy. Forest Science 1996;42:102-17. (Pubitemid 26263128)
183. Russell JH, Burdon RD, Yanchuk AD. Inbreeding depression and variance structures for height and adaptation in self-and outcross Thuja plicata families in varying environments. Forest Genetics 2003;10:171-84. (Pubitemid 38345489)
184. Libby WJ, McCutchan BG, Millar Cl. Inbreeding depression in selfs of redwood. Silvae Genetica 1981;30:15-25.
185. Andersson E, Jansson R, Lindgren D. Some results from second generation crossings involving inbreeding in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Silvae Genetica 1974;23:34-43.
186. Sorensen FC, Cress DW. Effects of sib mating on cone and seed traits in coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 1994;43:338-45.
187. Wang T, Aitken SN, Woods JH, Poisson K, Magnussen S. Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas fir growth and yield in operational plantations: a model-based approach. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2004;108:1162-71. (Pubitemid 38549889)
188. O'Connell LM. The evolution of inbreeding in western redcedar (Thuja plicata: Cupressaceae) [PhD Thesis]. University of British Columbia; 2003.
189. Moran GF, Bell JC, Griffin AR. Reduction in levels of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. compared with natural populations. Silvae Genetica 1989;38:32-6.
190. Lee SL. Mating system parameters of Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f. (Dipterocarpaceae) in three different forest types and a seed orchard. Heredity 2000;85:338-45. (Pubitemid 32122095)
191. Endler JA. Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; 1977.
192. Adams WT, Birkes DS. Mating patterns in seed orchards. In Proceedings of the 20th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Clemson University, Charleston, South Carolina; 1989. p. 75-86.
193. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K. Low levels of pollen contamination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as detected by allozyme markers. Silvae Genetica 1986;35:224-9.
194. Fast W, Dancik BP, Bower RC. Mating system and pollen contamination in a Douglas-fir clone bank. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1986;16:1314-19.
195. Kaya N, Isik K, Adams WT. Mating system and pollen contamination in a Pinus brutia seed orchard. New Forests 2006;31:409-16. (Pubitemid 43724231)
196. Pakkanen A, Nikkanen T, Pulkkinen P. Annual variation in pollen contamination and outcrossing in a Picea abies seed orchard. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2000;15:399-404.
197. Wheeler N, Jech K. Pollen contamination in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. In Proceedings from IUFRO Conference on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing and Seed Orchards, Williamsburg, VA; 1986, p. 160-71.
198. Adams GW, Kunze HA. Clonal variation in cone and seed production in black and white spruce seed orchards and management implications. Forestry Chronicle 1996;72:475-80.
199. Wodehouse RP. Pollen Grains. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1935.
200. Wheeler NC, Jech KS. The use of electrophoretic markers in seed orchard research. New Forests 1992;6:311-28.
201. El-Kassaby YA, Davidson R. Impact of crop management-practices on the seed crop genetic quality in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1990;39:230-7.
202. Brondani R P V, Brondani C, Tarchini R, Grattapaglia D. Development, characterization and mapping of microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1998;97:816-27. (Pubitemid 28519377)
203. Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S. Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2003;107:705-12. (Pubitemid 37078170)
204. Allen GS. Testing Douglas-fir seed for provenance. Proceedings of the International Seed Test Association 1961;26:388-403.
205. Koller D. Preconditioning of germination in lettuce at time of fruit ripening. American Journal of Botany 1962;49:841.
206. Sawhney R, Naylor JM. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 9. Demonstration of genetic variability affecting the response to temperature during seed development. Canadian Journal of Botany 1979;57:59-63.
207. Almqvist C, Bergsten U, Bondesson L, Eriksson U. Predicting germination capacity of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seeds using temperature data from weather stations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1998;28:1530-35.
208. Bramlett DL, Dell TR, Pepper WD. Genetic and maternal influences on Virginia pine seed-germination. Silvae Genetica 1983;32:1-4.
209. El-Kassaby YA, Chaisurisri K, Edwards D G W, W. TD. Genetic control of germination parameters for Douglas-fir, Sitka spruce, western redcedar, and yellow-cedar and its impact on container nursery production. In: Edwards DGW, editor. Dormancy and Barriers to Germination. Forestry Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC; 1993, p. 37-42.
210. Kozlowski TT, Gentle AC. Influence of the seed coat on germination, water absorption, and oxygen uptake of Eastern white pine seed. Forest Science 1959;5:389-95.
211. Edwards D G W. Maturity and quality of tree seeds-a state-of-the-art review. Seed Science and Technology 1980;8:625-57.
212. Edwards D G W, El-Kassaby YA. Effect of flowering phenology, date of cone collection, cone-storage treatment and seed pretreatment on yield and germination of seeds from a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Forest Ecology and Management 1988;25:17-29.
213. Shoulder E. Effect of seed size on germination, growth, and survival of slash pine. Journal of Forestry 1961;59:363-5.
214. Dunlap JR, Barnett JP. Influence of seed size on germination and early development of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) germinants. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1983;13:40-4.
215. Chaisurisri K, Edwards D G W, El-Kassaby YA. Genetic-control of seed size and germination in sitka spruce. Silvae Genetica 1992;41:348-55.
216. Lindgren D, Prescher F. Optimal clone number for seed orchards with tested clones. Silvae Genetica 2005;54:80-92. (Pubitemid 41140811)
217. McKeand S, Mullin T, Byram T, White T. Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south. Journal of Forestry 2003;101:32-7. (Pubitemid 37002418)
218. Kang KS, Harju AM, Lindgren D, Nikkanen T, Almqvist C, Suh GU. Variation in effective number of clones in seed orchards. New Forests 2001;21:17-33. (Pubitemid 32515873)
219. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1973;70:3321-3.
220. Yanchuk AD. A quantitative framework for breeding and conservation of forest tree genetic resources in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001;31:566-76. (Pubitemid 32752464)
221. Lindgren D. Genetisk diversitet, klonantal och froplantager. [Genetic diversity, number of clones and seed orchards.] (in Swedish). Sveriges Skogsvardsferbunds tidskrift [Swedish Forestry Association Journal] 1989;4/87:3-13.
222. Anonymous. Alberta Forest Genetic Resource Management and Conservation Standards: Second Revision of STIA. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Forestry Division, Edmonton, Alberta; 2009.
223. Johnson R, Lipow S. Compatibility of breeding for increased wood production and long-term sustainability: the genetic variation of seed orchard seed and associated risks. In Proceedings from Wood Compatibility Initiative Workshop. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-563; 2002. p. 169-79.
224. Lindgren D. Aspects on suitable number of clones in a seed orchard. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties S20401-3 on Population and Ecological Genetics, Breeding Theory, and Progeny Testing. Department of Forest Genetics, the Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden; 1974, p. 293-305.
225. Olsson T, Lindgren D, Li B. Balancing genetic gain and relatedness in seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 2001;50:222-7. (Pubitemid 34514204)
226. Magnussen S, Yeatman CW. Predictions of genetic gain from various selection methods in open pollinated Pinus banksiana progeny trials. Silvae Genetica 1990;39:140-53.
227. David A, Pike C, Stine R. Comparison of selection methods for optimizing genetic gain and gene diversity in a red pine (Pin us resinosa Ait.) seedling seed orchard. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2003;107:843-49. (Pubitemid 37231746)
228. Gietrych M. Seed orchard designs. In Forestry Commission Bulletin 54. HMSO, London, UK; 1975, p. 25-37.
229. Bell GD, Fletcher AM. Computer organized orchard layouts (COOL) based on the permutated neighborhood design concept. Silvae Genetica 1978;27:223-5.
230. El-Kassaby YA. Clonal-row vs. random seed orchard designs: mating pattern and seed yield of western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.). Forest Genetics 2003;10:121-27. (Pubitemid 38042878)
231. El-Kassaby YA, Stoehr MU, Reid D, Walsh CG, Lee TE. Clonal-row versus random seed orchard designs: interior spruce mating system evaluation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2007;37:690-6. (Pubitemid 47262304)
232. Adams WT. Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New Forests 1992;6:217-40.
233. Muller-Starck G. Cross-fertilization in a conifer stand inferred from enzyme gene-markers in seeds. Silvae Genetica 1977;26:223-6.
234. Yazdani R, Lindgren D, Stewart S. Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1989;4:295-306.
235. Neale D. Population genetic structure of the Douglas-fir shelterwood regeneration system in southwest Oregon [PhD Thesis]. Oregon State University; 1984.
236. Levin DA, Kerster HW. Gene flow in seed plants. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC editors. Evolutionary Biology, Vol 7. X +314 p. II lus Plenum Press, New York, NY; 1974. p. 139-220.
237. Handel SN. Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: Real L, editor. Pollination Biology. Academic Press, New York; 1983. p. 163-211.
238. Erickson VJ, Adams WT. Mating success in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchard as affected by distance and floral phenology. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1989;19:1248-55. (Pubitemid 20424737)
239. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology 2002;11:2379-91. (Pubitemid 35301908)
240. Jones ME, Shepherd M, Henry R, Delves A. Pollen flow in Eucalyptus grandis determined by paternity analysis using microsatellite markers. Tree Genetics and Genomes 2008;4:37-47. (Pubitemid 350165463)
241. Dow BD, Ashley MV. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology 1996;5:615-27. (Pubitemid 27102782)
242. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology 1999;8:831-41. (Pubitemid 29266889)
243. Ashton DH, Sandiford EM. Natural hybridization between Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. and Eucalyptus macrorhyncha F. Muell. in the Cathedral Range, Victoria. Australian Journal of Botany 1988;36:1-22.
244. Horskins K, Turner VB. Resource use and foraging patterns of honeybees, Apis mellifera, and native insects on flowers of Eucalyptus costata. Australian Journal of Ecology 1999;24:221-7.
245. Chakravarty GN, Bagchi SK. A computer-program for permutated neighborhood seed orchard design. Silvae Genetica 1993;42:1-5.
246. Chakravarty GN, Bagchi SK. Enhancement of the computer program of the permutated neighbourhood seed orchard design. Silvae Genetica 1994;43:177-9.
247. Lstiburek M, El-Kassaby YA. Minimum-inbreeding seed orchard design. Forest Science 2010;56:603-8.
248. Webber JE. Western hemlock: a manual for tree improvement seed production. Research Branch Work Paper 44. B. C. Ministry of Forests and Range, Research Branch, Victoria, BC; 2000.
249. O'Connell LM, Russell J, Ritland K. Fine-scale estimation of outcrossing in western redcedar with microsatellite assay of bulked DNA. Heredity 2004;93:443-9. (Pubitemid 39415589)
250. El-Kassaby YA, Parkinson J, Devitt W J B. The effect of crown segment on the mating system in a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco) seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1986;35:149-55.
251. Chaisurisri K, Mitton JB, El-Kassaby YA. Variation in the mating system of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) - evidence for partial assortative mating. American Journal of Botany 1994;81:1410-15.
252. Ross SD, Piesch RF, Portlock FT. Promotion of cone and seed production in rooted ramets and seedlings of western hemlock by gibberellins and adjunct cultural treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1981;11:90-8.
253. Ross SD. Enhancement of shoot elongation in Douglas-fir by gibberellin A4/7 and its relation to the hormonal promotion of flowering. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1983;13:986-94.
254. Ross SD, Bower RC. Cost-effective promotion of flowering in a Douglas-fir seed orchard by girdling and pulsed stem injection of gibberellin A4/7. Silvae Genetica 1989;38:189-95.
255. Ross SD, Bower RC. Promotion of seed production in Douglas-fir grafts by girdling plus gibberellin A4/7 stem injection and effect of retreatment. New Forests 1991;5:23-34.
256. Bramlett DL, Burns LC. Topworking young scions into reproductively-mature loblolly pine. In: Weir JR, Hatcher AV editors. Proceedings of the 23rd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Asheville, NC; 1995, p. 234-41.
257. Hartman HT, Kestler DE. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. Prentice Hall, Inc., Engelwood Cliffs, N. J.; 1983.
258. Almqvist C, Ekberg I. Interstock and GA 4/7 effects on flowering after topgrafting in Pinus sylvestris. Forest Genetics 2001;8:279-84. (Pubitemid 34657297)
259. Goading GD, Bridgwater FE, Bramlett DL, Lowe WJ. Top grafting loblolly pine in the Western Gulf region. In Proceedings of the 25th Biennial Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee, New Orleans, LO, USA; 2000. p. 60-6.
260. Bramlett DL. Genetic gain from mass controlled pollination and topworking. Journal of Forestry 1997;95:15-9. (Pubitemid 127590609)
261. Bramlett DL, Burns LC. Topworking genetic selections to reduce the breeding cycle in loblolly pine. In Proceedings of the 9th Biannual Southern Silviculture Research Conference, Clemson, South Carolina. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC; 1998. p. 12-5.
262. Perez A M M, White TL, Huber DA, Martin TA. Graft survival and promotion of female and male strobili by topgrafting in a third-cycle slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) breeding program. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2007;37:1244-1252. (Pubitemid 350056945)
263. Robinson LW, Wareing PF. Experiments on juvenile-adult phase change in some woody species. New Phytologist 1969;68:67-78.
264. O'Connell LM, Viard F, Russell J, Ritland K. The mating system in natural populations of western redcedar (Thuja plicata). Canadian Journal of Botany 2001;79:753-6. (Pubitemid 32752492)
265. O'Connell LM, Ritland K, Thompson SL. Patterns of post-glacial colonization by western redcedar (Thuja plicata, Cupressaceae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. Botany 2008;86:194-203. (Pubitemid 351534587)
266. El-Kassaby YA, Russell J, Ritland K. Mixed mating in an experimental population of western red cedar, Thuja plicata. Journal of Heredity 1994;85:227-31. (Pubitemid 24188038)
267. Askew GR. Potential genetic improvement due to supplemental mass pollination management in conifer seed orchards. Forest Ecology and Management 1992;47:135-47.
268. Bridgwater FE, Bramlett DL, Byram TD, Lowe WJ. Controlled mass pollination in loblolly pine to increase genetic gains. Forestry Chronicle 1998;74:185-89. (Pubitemid 28301101)
269. Bridgwater FE, Blush TD, Wheeler NC. Supplemental mass pollination. In: L. D, Askew GR, Blush TD, Bridwater FE, Jett JB editors. Advances in Pollen Management; U. S. D. A. Handbook 698. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC; 1993. p. 69-77.
270. Bridgwater FE, Trew IF. Supplemental mass pollination. In: Franklin EC editor. Agriculture Handbook 587. U. S. D. A. Forest Service, Washington, DC; 1981. p. 52-6.
271. Wakeley PC, Wells OO, Campbell TE. Mass production of shortleafxslash pine hybrids by pollinating unbagged female flowers. In: Joint Proceedings of the Second Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. U. S. D. A. Forest Service, St. Paul, USA; 1966. p. 78-9.
272. Webber JE. Pollen management for intensive seed orchard production. Tree Physiology 1995;15:507-14.
273. Daniels JD. Efficacy of supplemental mass-pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1978;27:52-8.
274. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K, Fashler A M K, Devitt W J B. The role of reproductive phenology upon the mating system of a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1988;37:76-82.
275. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K. The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1986;35:240-4.
276. El-Kassaby YA, Edwards D G W, Cook C. Impact of crop management practices on seed yield in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 1990;39:226-30.
277. El-Kassaby YA, Barnes S, Cook C, Macleod DA. Supplemental mass pollination success rate in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1993;23:1096-9.
278. Owens JN, Simpson SJ, Molder M. The pollination mechanism and the optimal time of pollination in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesin. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1981;11:36-50.
279. Eriksson U, Jansson G, Yazdani R, Wilhelmsson L. Effects of supplemental mass pollination (SMP) in a young and a mature seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiology 1995;15:519-26.
280. Yazdani R, Hadders G, Szmidt AE. Supplemental mass pollination in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris L. investigated by isozyme analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1986;1:309-16.
281. Stoehr M, Mehl H, Nicholson G, Pieper G, Newton C. Evaluating supplemental mass pollination efficacy in a lodgepole pine orchard in British Columbia using chloroplast DNA markers. New Forests 2006;31:83-90. (Pubitemid 41813275)
282. Bridgwater FE, Bramlett DL, Matthews FR. Supplemental mass pollination is feasible on an operational scale. In Proceedings from the 19th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, College Station, TX; 1987, p. 216-22.
283. Eriksson U, Yazdani R, Wilhelmsson L, Danell O. Success rate of supplemental mass pollination in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris L. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1994;9:60-67. (Pubitemid 2039316)
284. Moncur MW, Charles R, Kleinschmidt GJ. Can honeybees increase seed production in blue gum, Eucalyptus globulus? Australian Beekeeper 1993;95:248-53.
285. Moncur MW, Mitchell A, Fripp Y, Kleinschmidt GJ. The role of honey bees (Apis mellifera) in eucalypt and acacia seed production areas. Commonwealth Forestry Review 1995;74:350-4. (Pubitemid 26471016)
286. Nardi T, Kanso A. The role of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the pollination of a eucalypt plantation in Pati. Honeybee Science 1995;16:24-6.
287. Silen RR, Keane G. Cooling a Douglas-fir seed orchard to avoid pollen contamination. U. S. D. A. Forest Service Research Note PNW-101; 1969.
288. Fashler A M K, Devitt W J B. A practical solution to Douglas-fir seed orchard pollen contamination. Forestry Chronicle 1980;56:237-41.
289. Silen RR. Further Trials of Cold Water Spray to Reduce Seed Orchard Contamination. Industrial Forestry Association, Olympia, WA; 1970.
290. El-Kassaby YA, Davidson R. Impact of pollination environment manipulation on the apparent outcrossing rate in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Heredity 1991;66:55-9.
291. Lindgren D, El-Kassaby YA. Genetic consequences of combining selective cone harvesting and genetic thinning in clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1989;38:65-70.
292. Kang KS, El-Kassaby YA. Considerations of correlated fertility between genders on genetic diversity: the Pinus densiflora seed orchard as a model. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2002;105:1183-9. (Pubitemid 36053144)
293. Bila AD, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. Fertility variation and its effect on diversity over generations in a teak plantation (Tectona grandis L.f.). Silvae Genetica 1999;48:109-14.
294. Kang KS, Kjaer ED, Lindgren D. Balancing gene diversity and nut production in Corylus avellana collections. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2003;18:118-26. (Pubitemid 37078079)
295. Kang KS, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ, Choi WY, Han SU. Genetic gain and diversity of orchard crops under alternative management options in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus thunbergii. Silvae Genetica 2005;54:93-6. (Pubitemid 41483434)
296. Son S-G, Kang K-S, Lindgren D, Hyun J-O. Qualification for the value of seed orchard considering breeding value and seed productivity. Journal of Korean Forestry Association 2003;91:601-8.