Compatibility of breeding for increased wood production and long-term sustainability: The genetic variation of seed orchard seed and associated risks

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue 563, 2002, Pages 169-182

  Johnson, Randy ^a   Lipow, Sarah ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; Risks; Seed orchards; Tree breeding

Indexed keywords

GENETIC VARIATION; ORCHARD; PLANT BREEDING; SEED; SILVICULTURE;

EID: 33646990564     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anonymous. 1976. Twentieth annual report on cooperative tree improvement and hardwood research program. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
2. Adams, W.T. 1981. Population genetics and gene conservation in Pacific Northwest conifers. In: Scudder, G.G.E.; Reveal J.L., eds. Evolution today, proceedings of the second international congress on systematic and evolutionary biology, 401-405.
3. Adams, W.T.; Zuo, Z.; Shimizu, J.Y.; Tappeiner, J.C. 1998. Impact of alternative regeneration methods on genetic diversity in coastal Douglas-fir. Forest Science. 44: 390-396.
4. Berg, E.E.; Hamrick, J.L. 1997. Quantification of genetic diversity at allozyme loci. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 415-424.
5. Bergmann, F.; Ruetz, W. 1991. Isozyme genetic variation and heterozygosity in random tree samples and selected orchard clones from the same Norway spruce populations. Forest Ecology and Management. 46: 39-47.
6. Bishir, J.; Roberds, J. 1995. Analysis of failure time in clonally propagated plant populations. Mathematical Biosciences. 125: 109-125.
7. Chaisurisri, K.; El-Kassaby, Y.A. 1994. Genetic diversity in a seed production population vs natural population of Sitka spruce. Biodiversity and Conservation. 3: 512-523.
8. El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2000. Effect of forest tree domestication on gene pools. In: Young, A.; Boshier, D.; Boyle, T., eds. Forest conservation genetics, principles and practice. Collingwood, VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing: 197-213.
9. El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Askew, G.R. 1991. The relation between reproductive phenology and output in determining the gametic pool profile in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Forest Science. 37: 827-835.
10. El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Ritland, K. 1996a. Genetic variation in low elevation Douglas-fir of British Columbia and its relevance to gene conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation. 5: 779-794.
11. El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Ritland, K. 1996b. Impact of selection and breeding on the genetic diversity in Douglas-fir. Biodiversity and Conservation. 5: 795-813.
12. th edition. Essex, England: Longman Group Ltd.: 464 p.
13. Godt, M.J.W.; Hamrick, J.L.; Edwards-Burke, M.A.; Williams, J.H. 2001. Comparison of genetic diversity in white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seed orchards with natural populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 31: 943-949.
14. th biennial southern forest tree improvement conference. Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee Publication No. 48: 147-153.
15. Herms, D.A.; Mattson, W.J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67: 283-335.
16. Hühn, M. 1986. Theoretical studies on the necessary number of components in mixtures. 3. Number of components and risk considerations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 72: 211-218.
17. Johnson, G.R.; Temel, F. 1998. Genetics of Swiss needle cast tolerance-early screening and field results. In: Filip, G., ed. Swiss Needle Cast Cooperative annual report, 1999. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, College of Forestry: 10-11.
18. Johnson, R. 1998. Breeding design considerations for coastal Douglas-fir. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-411. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 34 p.
19. Johnson, R.; St. Clair, B.; Lipow, S. 2001. Genetic conservation in applied tree breeding programs. In: Thielges, B., ed. Proceedings, international conference on ex situ and in situ conservation of commercial tropical trees. Yogykarta, Indonesia: Faculty of Forestry, Gadjah Mada University: 215-230.
20. Kimball, B.A.; Johnson, G.R.; Nolte, D.L.; Griffen, N.L. 1999. An examination of the genetic control of Douglas-fir vascular tissue phychemicals: Implication for black bear foraging. Forest Ecology and Management. 123: 245-251.
21. King, J.N.; Carson, M.J.; Johnson, G.R. 1998. Analysis of half diallels mating designs II-results from a third generation progeny test of the New Zealand radiata pine improvement programme. Silvae Genetica. 47: 80-87.
22. King, J.N.; Yanchuk, A.D.; Kiss, G.K.; Alfaro, R.I. 1997. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between weevil (Pissodes strobi) resistance and height growth in spruce populations of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 737-739.
23. Kjær, E.D. 1996. Estimation of effective population number in a Picea abies (Karst.) seed orchard based on flower assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 11: 111-121.
24. Knowles, P. 1985. Comparison of isozyme variation among natural stands and plantations: jack pine and black spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 15: 902-908.
25. Libby, W.J. 1982. What is a safe number of clones per plantation? In: Heybroek, H.M.; Stephan, B.R.; von Weissenberg, K., eds. Resistance to disease and pests in forest trees; proceedings of the third international workshop on the genetics of host-parasite interactions in forestry. Wageninger, Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation: 342-360.
26. Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology. 9: 782-791.
27. Lynch, M. 1995. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In: Avise, J.C.; Hamrick, J.L., eds. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. New York: Chapman and Hall: 471-501.
28. rd Southern forest tree improvement conference. Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee Publication No. 23: 197-203.
29. Millar, C.J.; Libby, W.J. 1991. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species. In: Falk, D.A.; Holsinger, K.E., eds. Genetics and conservation of rarc plants. New York: Oxford University Press: 149-170.
30. Moran, G.F.; Bell, J.C. 1987. The origin and genetic diversity of Pinus radiata in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 73: 616-622.
31. Namkoong, G.; Kang, H.C.; Brouard, J.S. 1988. Tree breeding: principles and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc. 180 p.
32. Roberds, J.H.; Bishir, J.W. 1997. Risk analyses in clonal forestry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 425-432.
33. Roberds, J.H.; Namkoong, G.; Skroppa, T. 1990. Genetic analysis of risk in clonal populations of forest trees. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 79: 841-848.
34. Rudin, D.; Eriksson, G.; Ekberg, I.; Rasmuson, M. 1974. Studies of allelic frequencies and inbreeding in Scots pine populations by aid of the isozyme technique. Silvae Genetica. 23: 10-13.
35. Rudin, D.; Lindgren, D. 1977. Isozyme studies in seed orchards. Stockholm: Swedish College of Forestry. 23 p.
36. Schmitdtling, R.C.; Hipkins, V. 1998. Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 28: 1135-1145.
37. Schmidtling, R.C.; Carroll, E.; LaFarge, T. 1999. Allozyme diversity of selected and natural loblolly pine populations. Silvae Genetica. 48: 35-45.
38. Skrøppa, T. 1996. Diallel crosses in Picea abies II. Performance and inbreeding depression of selfed families. Forest Genetics. 3: 69-79.
39. St. Clair, B.; Lipow, S. 2000. Pacific Northwest tree gene conservation group. Western Forester. 45(2): 17.
40. Stoehr, M.U.; El-Kassaby, Y.A. 1997. Levels of genetic diversity at different stages of the domestication cycle of interior spruce in British Columbia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 94: 83-90.
41. Szmidt, A.E.; Muona, O. 1985. Genetic effects of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) domestication. Lecture Notes Biomathematics. 60: 241-252.
42. White, T. 1992. Advanced-generation breeding populations: size and structure. In: Proceedings: IUFRO conference S2.02-08, breeding tropical trees-Resolving tropical forest resource concerns through tree improvement, gene conservation and domestication of new species. Raleigh, NC: CAMCORE: 208-222.
43. Yanchuk, A.D. 2001. A quantitative framework for breeding and conservation of forest tree genetic resources in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 31: 566-576.
44. Yeh, F.C.; El-Kassaby, Y.A. 1980. Enzyme variation in natural populations of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). I. genetic variation patterns among trees from IUFRO provenances. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 10: 415-422.
45. Zheng, Y-Q.; Ennos, R.A. 1999. Genetic variability and structure of natural and domesticated populations of Caribbean pine (Pinus caribaea Morelet). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 98: 765-771.