Sann: Solvent accessibility prediction of proteins by nearest neighbor method

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1791-1797

  Joo, Keehyoung ^a   Lee, Sung Jong ^a,b   Lee, Jooyoung ^a  

^a Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

^b Suwon University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Machine learning; Sequence analysis; Sequence profile; Solvent accessibility prediction

Indexed keywords

SOLVENT;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; NEAREST NEIGHBOR METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOLVENTS;

EID: 84862184719     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24074     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971; 55: 379-400.
2. Joo K, Lee J, Lee S, Seo J-H, Lee SJ, Lee J. High accuracy template based modeling by global optimization. Proteins 2007; 69(Suppl 8): 83-89.
3. Xu J, Peng J, Zhao F. Template-based and free modeling by raptor++ in casp8. Proteins 2009; 77: 133-137.
4. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. Multicom: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in casp8. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 882-888.
5. Benkert P, Tosatto SCE, Schwede T. Global and local model quality estimation at casp8 using the scoring functions qmean and qmeanclust. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 173-180.
6. Cheng J, Wang Z, Tegge AN, Eickholt J. Prediction of global and local quality of casp8 models by multicom series. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 181-184.
7. Peng J, Xu J. Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: i294-i300.
8. Holbrook SR, Muskal SM, Kim S-H. Predicting surface exposure of amino acids from protein sequence. Protein Eng 1990; 3: 659-665.
9. Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994; 20: 216-226.
10. Ehrlich L, Reczko M, Bohr H, Wade RC. Prediction of protein hydration sites from sequence by modular neural networks. Protein Eng 1998; 11: 11-19.
11. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2002; 47: 142-153.
12. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM. Netasa: neural network based prediction of solvent accessibility. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 819-824.
13. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003; 50: 629-635.
14. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 2004; 56: 753-767.
15. Garg A, Kaur H, Raghava GPS. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in proteins using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins 2005; 61: 318-324.
16. Dor O, Zhou Y. Real-spine: an integrated system of neural networks for real value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins 2007; 68: 76-81.
17. Faraggi E, Xue B, Zhou Y. Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real-value backbone torsion angles of proteins by guided-learning through a two-layer neural network. Proteins 2009; 74: 857-871.
18. Yuan Z, Burrage K, Mattick JS. Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using support vector machines. Proteins 2002; 48: 566-570.
19. Kim H, Park H. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with support vector machines and long-range interaction 3d local descriptor. Proteins 2004; 54: 557-562.
20. Naderi-Manesh H, Sadeghi M, Arab S, Movahedi A. Prediction of protein surface accessibility with information theory. Proteins 2001; 42: 452-459.
21. Li X, Pan X-M. New methods for accurate prediction of solvent accessibility from protein sequence. Proteins 2001; 42: 1-5.
22. Thompson MJ, Godstein RA. Predicting solvent accessibility: higher accuracy using bayesian statistics and optimized residue substitution classes. Proteins 1996; 25: 38-47.
23. Sim J, Kim S-Y, Lee J. Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using fuzzy k-nearest neighbor method. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2844-2849.
24. Yuan Z, Huang B. Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression. Proteins 2004; 57: 558-564.
25. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70 % accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993; 232: 584-589.
26. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. Pisces: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1589-1591.
27. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983; 22: 2577-2637.
28. Chothia C. The nature of accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976; 105: 1-14.
29. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-402.
30. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices1. J Mol Biol 1999; 292: 195-202.
31. Joo K, Kim I, Kim S-Y, Lee J, Lee J, Lee SJ. Prediction of the secondary structures of proteins by using predict, a nearest neighbor method on pattern space. J Kor Phys Soc 2004; 45: 1441-1449.
32. Rost B, Yachdav G, Liu J. The predictprotein server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32 Web Server issue: W321-W326.
33. Krieger E, Joo K, Lee J, Lee J, Raman S, Thompson J, Tyka M, Baker D, Karplus K. Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: four approaches that performed well in casp8. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 114-122.
34. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS, computer program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, 1993.