Template-based and free modeling by RAPTOR ++ in CASP8

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 77, Issue SUPPL. 9, 2009, Pages 133-137

  Xu, Jinbo ^a   Peng, Jian ^a   Zhao, Feng ^a  

^a TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Model quality assessment; Protein threading; Template based modeling; Template free modeling

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 74249111445     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22567     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001; 294: 93-96. (Pubitemid 32952955)
2. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Rossi A, Marti-Renom M, Karchin R, Webb BM, Eramian D, Shen MY, Kelly L, Melo F, Sali A. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: D291-D295.
3. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: W526-W531. (Pubitemid 38997389)
4. Zhou HY, Skolnick J. Ab initio protein structure prediction using Chunk-TASSER. Biophys J 2007; 93: 1510-1518. (Pubitemid 47403296)
5. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y. RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2003; 1: 95-117.
6. McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 3215-3220. (Pubitemid 36356563)
7. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Sippl MJ, Domingues FS. ProSup: a refined tool for protein structure alignment. Protein. Eng 2000; 13: 745-752. (Pubitemid 32127572)
8. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 2302-2309. (Pubitemid 41439897)
9. Sali A. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Mol Med Today 1995; 1: 270-277.
10. Joo K, Lee J, Lee S, Seo JH, Lee SJ, Lee J. High accuracy template based modeling by global optimization. Proteins 2007; 69: 83-89. (Pubitemid 350210115)
11. Cheng J. A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling. BMC Struct Biol 2008; 8: 18, (Pubitemid 351537916)
12. Poirot O, O'Toole E, Notredame C. Tcoffee@igs: a web server for computing, evaluating and combining multiple sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3503-3506. (Pubitemid 37442186)
13. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Science 2003; 12: 1073-1086.
14. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2714-2716; 2003; 12: 2121. (Pubitemid 35191145)
15. Zhao F, Li SC, Sterner BW, Xu J. Discriminative learning for protein conformation sampling. Proteins 2008; 73: 228-240.
16. Feng Zhao, Jian Peng, Joe DeBartolo, Karl F. Freed, Tobin R. Sosnick and Jinbo Xu. A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Ab Initio Folding, Proc. 13th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5541, pp. 59-73, 2009. Springer.
17. Kent JT. The fisher-bingham distribution on the sphere. J Roy Stat Soc B 1982; 44: 71-80.
18. Xu J. Protein fold recognition by predicted alignment accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2005; 2: 157-165. (Pubitemid 41049916)
19. Fitzgerald JE, Jha AK, Colubri A, Sosnick TR, Freed KF. Reduced C-beta statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 2123-2139. (Pubitemid 47481648)
20. Shen M, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 2507-2524. (Pubitemid 44771688)
21. Morozov AV, Kortemme T, Tsemekhman K, Baker D. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 6946-6951. (Pubitemid 38596423)
22. Fernandez A, Sosnick TR, Colubri A. Dynamics of hydrogen bond desolvation in protein folding. J Mol Biol 2002; 321: 659-675. (Pubitemid 36124804)
23. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill PC, Sammut SJ, Hotz HR, Ceric G, Forslund K, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: D281-D288.
24. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998; 14: 755-763.
25. Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjolander K, Haussier D. Hidden Markov-models in computational biology-Applications to Protein Modeling. J Mol Biol 1994; 235: 1501-1531. (Pubitemid 2022516)
26. Shi S, Pei J, Sadreyev RI, Kinch LN, Majumdar I, Tong J, Cheng H, Kim B-H, Grishin NV, "Analysis of casp8 targets, predictions and assessment methods," Database, vol. 2009, no. 0, pp. bap003+, April 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bap003.
27. Randall A, Baldi P. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERS. BMC Struct Biol 2008; 8: 52.