A review of statistical methods for prediction of proteolytic cleavage

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 337-349

  duVerle, David A ^a   Mamitsuka, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Calpain; Caspase; Cleavage prediction; Hiv 1 protease; Machine learning; Protease; Proteolysis

Indexed keywords

CALPAIN; CASPASE;

ALGORITHM; BINDING SITE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METABOLISM; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; REVIEW; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CALPAIN; CASPASES; MARKOV CHAINS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROTEOLYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84861832126     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr059     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Chou KC. Review: Prediction of HIV protease cleavage sites in proteins. Anal Biochem 1996;233(1):1-14.
2. Von Heijne G. A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res 1986;14(11):4683.
3. Thompson TB, Chou KC, Zheng C. Neural network prediction of the HIV-1 protease cleavage sites. J. Theoretical Biol 1995;177(4):369-79.
4. Cai YD, Chou KC. Artificial neural network model for predicting HIV protease cleavage sites in protein. Adv in Eng Softw 1998;29(2):119-128.
5. Cai YD, Lin S, Chou KC. Support vector machines for prediction of protein signal sequences and their cleavage sites. Peptides 2003;24(1):159-61.
6. Rögnvaldsson T, You L. Why neural networks should not be used for HIV-1 protease cleavage site prediction. Bioinformatics 2004;20(11):1702-109.
7. Shen HB, Chou KC. Hivcleave: a web-server for predicting human immunodeficiency virus protease cleavage sites in proteins. Analytical Biochemistry 2008;375(2):388-90.
8. Backes C, Kuentzer J, Lenhof HP, et al. Grabcas: a bioinformatics tool for score-based prediction of caspase-and granzyme B-cleavage sites in protein sequences. NucleicAcidsRes 2005;33(Suppl. 2):W208.
9. Wee L, Tan T, Ranganathan S. Svm-based prediction of caspase substrate cleavage sites. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7(Suppl 5):S14.
10. Yang ZR. Prediction of caspase cleavage sites using Bayesian bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 2005;21(9):1831.
11. duVerle D, Ono Y, Sorimachi H, et al. Calpain cleavage prediction using multiple kernel learning. PLoS One 2011; 6(5):e19035.
12. Ono Y, Shimada H, Sorimachi H, et al. Functional defects of a muscle-specific calpain, p94, caused by mutations associated with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A. J Biol Chem 1998;273(27):17073.
13. Richard I, Broux O, Allamand V, et al. Mutations in the proteolytic enzyme calpain 3 cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A. Cell 1995;81(1):27-40.
14. Harris F, Biswas S, Singh J, et al. Calpains and their multiple roles in diabetes mellitus. Ann NYAcad Sci 2006; 1084:452.
15. Horikawa Y, Oda N, Cox NJ, et al. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Genet 2000;26(2):163-75.
16. Kimura Y, Saya H, Nakao M. Calpain-dependent proteolysis of NF2 protein: involvement in schwannomas and meningiomas. Neuropathology 2000;20(3):153-60.
17. Wells A, Huttenlocher A, Lauffenburger DA. Calpain proteases in cell adhesion and motility. IntlRevCytol 2005;245: 1-16.
18. Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF. Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. New York: Academic Press, 1998.
19. Craik CS, Largman C, Fletcher T, etal. Redesigning trypsin: alteration of substrate specificity. Science 1985;228(4697): 291.
20. Demon D, Van Damme P, Berghe TV, et al. Caspase substrates: easily caught in deep waters? Trends Biotechnol 2009; 27:680-88.
21. Choe Y, Leonetti F, Greenbaum DC, et al. Substrate profiling of cysteine proteases using a combinatorial peptide library identifies functionally unique specificities. J Biol Chem 2006;281(18):12824.
22. Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. Merops: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Suppl. 1): D227.
23. Igarashi Y, Eroshkin A, Gramatikova S, et al. Cutdb: a proteolytic event database. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;35(Suppl 1): D546.
24. duVerle D, Takigawa I, Ono Y, et al. CaMPDB: a resource for calpain and modulatory proteolysis. Genome Inform 2010. 22:202.
25. Sakai K, Akanuma H, Imahori K, et al. A unique specificity of a calcium activated neutral protease indicated in histone hydrolysis. J Biochem 1987;101(4):911.
26. Qian N, Sejnowski TJ. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. J Mol Biol 1988;202(4):865-84.
27. Yang ZR, Chou KC. Bio-support vector machines for computational proteomics. Bioinformatics 2004;20(5):735.
28. Akbani R, Kwek S, Japkowicz N. Applying support vector machines to imbalanced datasets. Machine Learning: ECML 2004 2004;39-50.
29. Hand DJ, Till RJ. A simple generalisation of the area under the roc curve for multiple class classification problems. Machine Learning 2001;45(2):171-86.
30. Schneider TD, Stephens RM. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18(20):6097.
31. Poorman RA, Tomasselli AG, Heinrikson RL, et al. A cumulative specificity model for proteases from human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2, inferred from statistical analysis of an extended substrate data base. JBiolChem 1991; 266(22):14554.
32. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Position-based sequence weights. JMol Biol 1994;243(4):574-78.
33. Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, et al. Uniprotkb/ swiss-prot. MethodsMol Biol 2007;406:89.
34. Nakashima H, Nishikawa K, Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. JBiochem 1986;99(1):153.
35. Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices. Comp Appl Biosci: CABIOS 1996;12(2):135.
36. Chou KC, Zhang CT, Kézdy FJ, et al. A vector projection method for predicting the specificity of GalNAc-transferase. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 1995;21(2):118-26.
37. Turk BE, Huang LL, Piro ET, et al. Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries. Nature Biotechnol 2001;19(7):661-67.
38. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, et al. Protein identification and analysis tools on the expasy server. Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2005;571-607.
39. Garay-Malpartida HM, Occhiucci JM, Alves J, et al. Caspredictor: a new computer-based tool for caspase substrate prediction. Bioinformatics 2005;21(Suppl. 1):i169.
40. Thomson R, Hodgman TC, Yang ZR, et al. Characterizing proteolytic cleavage site activity using bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 2003;19(14):1741.
41. Duckert P, Brunak S, Blom N. Prediction of proprotein convertase cleavage sites. Protein Eng Design Selection 2004; 17(1):107.
42. Yang ZR, Thomson R. Bio-basis function neural network for prediction of protease cleavage sites in proteins. Neural Networks, IEEETrans 2005;16(1):263-74.
43. Cybenko G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. MCSS 1989;2(4):303-14.
44. Tetko IV, Livingstone DJ, Luik AI. Neural network studies. comparison of overfitting and overtraining. JChemInform Comp Sci 1995;35(5):826-33.
45. Lohmüller T, Wenzler D, Hagemann S, et al. Toward computer-based cleavage site prediction of cysteine endopeptidases. Biol Chem 2003;384(6):899.
46. Tompa P, Buzder-Lantos P, Tantos A, et al. On the sequential determinants of calpain cleavage. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(20):20775.
47. Piippo M, Lietzen N, Nevalainen OS, et al. Pripper: prediction of caspase cleavage sites from whole proteomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11(1):320.
48. Quinlan JR. C4. 5: Programs forMachine Learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
49. Kim H, Zhang Y, Heo YS, etal. Specificity rule discovery in HIV-1 protease cleavage site analysis. Comput Biol Chem 2008;32(1):72-79.
50. Andonie R, Fabry-Asztalos L, Collar CJ, et al. Neuro-fuzzy prediction of biological activity and rule extraction for HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2005. CIBCB'05. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on IEEE. La Jolla, CA, USA: IEEE, 2005;1-8.
51. Nielsen H, Brunak S, Von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 1999;12(1):3.
52. Zhang Z, Wood WI. A profile hidden markov model for signal peptides generated by hmmer. Bioinformatics 2003; 19(2):307.
53. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998;14(9):755.
54. Zhang YQ, Rajapakse JC. Machine Learning in Bioinformatics. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2008.
55. Yang ZR. Biological applications of support vector machines. Briefings Bioinformatics 2004;5(4):328.
56. Song J, Tan H, Shen H, et al. Cascleave: towards more accurate prediction of caspase substrate cleavage sites. Bioinformatics 2010;26(6):752.
57. Ben-Hur A, Noble WS. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2005;21(Suppl. 1):i38.
58. Leslie C, Eskin E, Noble WS. The spectrum kernel: A string kernel for svm protein classification. In Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Vol. 7. Hawaii, USA: World Scientific Press, 2002, 566-75.
59. Barkan DT, Hostetter DR, Mahrus S, et al. Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1714.
60. Lanckriet G.R.G, De Bie T, Cristianini N, et al. A statistical framework for genomic data fusion. Bioinformatics 2004; 20(16):2626-635.
61. Chapelle O, Vapnik V, Bousquet O, et al. Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Machine Learning 2002;46(1):131-59.
62. Sonnenburg S, Rätsch G, Schäfer C, et al. Large scale multiple kernel learning. JMachine Learning Res 2006;7:1565.
63. Kloft M, Brefeld U, Sonnenburg S, et al. Efficient and accurate lp-norm multiple kernel learning. Advances Neural Inform Process Syst 2009;22(22):997-1005.
64. Tomioka R, Suzuki T. Regularization strategies and empirical bayesian learning for mkl 2010. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1011.3090.
65. Liu Z, Cao J, Gao X, et al. Gps-ccd: A novel computational program for the prediction of calpain cleavage sites. PLoS One 2011;6(4):e19001.
66. Ma S, Huang J. Penalized feature selection and classification in bioinformatics. Briefings Bioinformatics 2008;9(5): 392.
67. Peters B, Janek K, Kuckelkorn U, et al. Assessment of proteasomal cleavage probabilities from kinetic analysis of time-dependent product formation. JMol Biol 2002;318(3): 847-62.