Combining protein evolution and secondary structure

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 666-673

  Thorne, Jeffrey L ^a   Goldman, Nick ^b,d   Jones, David T ^b,c,e  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

hidden Markov model; maximum likelihood; molecular evolution; phylogeny; protein structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0029985399     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025627     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ASAI, K., S. HAYAMIZU, and K. HANDA. 1993. Prediction of protein secondary structure by the hidden Markov model. CABIOS 9:141-146.
2. BENNER, S. A., and D. GERLOFF. 1991. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 31:121-181.
3. CHOTHIA, C., and A. M. LESK. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 5:823-826.
4. CHURCHILL, G. A. 1989. Stochastic models for heterogeneous DNA sequences. Bull. Math. Biol. 51:79-94.
5. DAYHOFF, M. O., R. V. ECK, and C. M. ECK. 1972. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 89-99 in M. O. DAYHOFF, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Vol. 5. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
6. DAYHOFF, M. O., R. M. SCHWARTZ, and B. C. ORCUTT. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 345-352 in M. O. DAYHOFF, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Vol. 5, suppl. 3. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
8. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1989. Phylip - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166.
9. FELSENSTEIN, J., and G. A. CHURCHILL. 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:93-104.
10. FLORES, T. P., C. A. ORENGO, D. S. Moss, and J. M. THORNTON. 1993. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 2:1811-1826.
11. GOLDMAN, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
12. GOLDMAN, N., and Z. YANG. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
13. GONNET, G. H., M. A. COHEN, and S. A. BENNER. 1992. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 256:1443-1445.
14. GRANTHAM, R. 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185:862-864.
15. HEIN, J. 1990. A unified approach to alignment and phylogenies. Pp. 626-645 in R. F. DOOLITTLE. ed. Methods in enzymology. Vol. 183. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
16. HUNTER, W. G. 1982. Graduate programs in statistics. Pp. 35-69 in J. S. RUSTAGI and D. A. WOLFE, eds. Teaching of statistics and statistical consulting. Academic Press, New York. N.Y.
17. JONRS, D. T., W. R TAYLOR, and J. M. THORNTON. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. CABIOS 8:275-282.
18. KABSCH, W., and C. SANDER. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637.
19. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, and M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol Evol. 31:151-160.
20. LEVITT, M., and C. CHOTHIA. 1976. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 261:552-558.
21. LUTHY, R., A. D. MCLACHLAN, and D. EISENBERG. 1991. Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 10:229-239.
22. MUSE, S. V., and B. S. GAUT. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with applications to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
23. ORENGO, C. A., D. T. JONES, and J. M. THORNTON. 1994. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372:631-634.
24. OVERINGTON, J., M. S. JOHNSON, A. SALI, and T. L. BLUNDELL. 1990. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 241:132-145.
25. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, and D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 In D. M. HILLIS, C. MORITZ, and B. K. MABLE, eds. Molecular systematics, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
26. TAYLOR, W. R., and D. T. JONES. 1993. Deriving an amino acid distance matrix. J. Theor. Biol. 164:65-83.
27. THORNTON, J. M., T. P. FLORES, D. T. JONES, and M. B. SWINDELLS. 1991. Prediction of progress at last. Nature 354:105-106.
28. TOPHAM, C. M., A. MCLEOD, F. EISENMENGER, J. P. OVERINGTON, M. S. JOHNSON, and T. L. BLUNDELL. 1993. Fragment ranking in modelling of protein structure: conformationally constrained substitution tables. J. Mol. Biol. 229:194-220.
29. WAKO, H., and T. L. BLUNDELL. 1994. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homologous proteins. I. Solvent accessibility classes. J. Mol. Biol. 238:682-692.
30. WHITE, J. V., C. M. STULTZ, and T. F. SMITH. 1994. Protein classification by stochastic modeling and optimal filtering of amino-acid sequences. Math. Biosci. 119:35-75.
31. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
32. YANG, Z. 1995. A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences. Genetics 139:993-1005.
33. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, and A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.