Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for meiotic cell cycle regulation in mouse oocytes

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1948-1955

  Chen, Lei ^a,b   Chao, Shi Bin ^a   Wang, Zhen Bo ^a   Qi, Shu Tao ^a,b   Zhu, Xiu Lan ^a   Yang, Shang Wu ^a   Yang, Cai Rong ^a   Zhang, Qing Hua ^a   Ouyang, Ying Chun ^a   Hou, Yi ^a   Schatten, Heide ^c   Sun, Qing Yuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint kinase 1; Germinal vesicle breakdown; Meiosis; Oocyte; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 1;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME LOCALIZATION; FEMALE; GERMINAL VESICLE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; METAPHASE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION;

EID: 84861413465     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.20279     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Homer H, Gui L, Carroll J. A spindle assembly checkpoint protein functions in prophase I arrest and prometaphase progression. Science 2009; 326:991-4; PMID:19965510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1175326.
2. Jones KT. Anaphase-promoting complex control in female mouse meiosis. Results Probl Cell Differ 2011; 53:343-63; PMID:21630152; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-19065-0-15.
3. 2-arrest in somatic cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16:654-64; PMID:20453035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaq034.
4. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644-56; PMID:16896351; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1988.
5. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem Sci 2005; 30:630-41; PMID:16236519; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs. 2005.09.005.
6. Solc P, Saskova A, Baran V, Kubelka M, Schultz RM, Motlik J. CDC25A phosphatase controls meiosis I progression in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 2008; 317:260-9; PMID:18367163; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.028.
7. Tripathi A, Kumar KV, Chaube SK. Meiotic cell cycle arrest in mammalian oocytes. J Cell Physiol 2010; 223:592-600; PMID:20232297.
8. Sun QY, Miao YL, Schatten H. Towards a new understanding on the regulation of mammalian oocyte meiosis resumption. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:2741-7; PMID:19717979; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.17.9471.
9. Dai Y, Grant S. New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16:376-83; PMID:20068082; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029.
10. Carrassa L, Damia G. Unleashing Chk1 in cancer therapy. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:2121-8; PMID:21610326; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.13.16398.
11. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kaçmaz K, Linn S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:39-85; PMID:15189136; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. biochem.73.011303.073723.
12. Takai H, Tominaga K, Motoyama N, Minamishima YA, Nagahama H, Tsukiyama T, et al. Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1439-47; PMID:10859163.
13. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93; PMID:17426725; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nrm2163.
14. Wassmann K, Niault T, Maro B. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1596-608; PMID:13678590; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.052.
15. Homer HA, McDougall A, Levasseur M, Yallop K, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Mad2 prevents aneuploidy and premature proteolysis of cyclin B and securin during meiosis I in mouse oocytes. Genes Dev 2005; 19:202-7; PMID:15655110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.328105.
16. Li M, Li S, Yuan J, Wang ZB, Sun SC, Schatten H, et al. Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS One 2009; 4:7701; PMID:19888327; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0007701.
17. Wei L, Liang XW, Zhang QH, Li M, Yuan J, Li S, et al. BubR1 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating meiotic cell cycle progression of mouse oocyte. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1112-21; PMID:20237433; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc. 9.6.10957.
18. Hached K, Xie SZ, Buffin E, Cladière D, Rachez C, Sacras M, et al. Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis I. Development 2011; 138:2261-71; PMID:21558374; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.061317.
19. Zhang D, Li M, Ma W, Hou Y, Li YH, Li SW, et al. Localization of mitotic arrest deficient 1 (MAD1) in mouse oocytes during the first meiosis and its functions as a spindle checkpoint protein. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:58-68; PMID:15342357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.032987.
20. Yin S, Wang Q, Liu JH, Ai JS, Liang CG, Hou Y, et al. Bub1 prevents chromosome misalignment and precocious anaphase during mouse oocyte meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:2130-7; PMID:16969117; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.18. 3170.
21. McGuinness BE, Anger M, Kouznetsova A, Gil-Bernabé AM, Helmhart W, Kudo NR, et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2009; 19:369-80; PMID:19249208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.064.
22. Leland S, Nagarajan P, Polyzos A, Thomas S, Samaan G, Donnell R, et al. Heterozygosity for a Bub1 mutation causes female-specific germ cell aneuploidy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:12776-81; PMID:19617567; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903075106.
23. Sun SC, Kim NH. Spindle assembly checkpoint and its regulators in meiosis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18:60-72; PMID:22086113; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/humupd/dmr044.
24. Tang J, Erikson RL, Liu X. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is required for mitotic progression through negative regulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:11964-9; PMID:16873548; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.0604987103.
25. Zachos G, Black EJ, Walker M, Scott MT, Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC, et al. Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Dev Cell 2007; 12:247-60; PMID:17276342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.003.
26. Peddibhotla S, Lam MH, Gonzalez-Rimbau M, Rosen JM. The DNA-damage effector checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:5159-64; PMID:19289837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806671106.
27. Nakajo N, Oe T, Uto K, Sagata N. Involvement of Chk1 kinase in prophase I arrest of Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol 1999; 207:432-44; PMID:10068474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1998.9178.
28. Miles DC, van den Bergen JA, Sinclair AH, western PS. Regulation of the female mouse germ cell cycle during entry into meiosis. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:408-18; PMID:20023406; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.2.10691.
29. Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 2009; 81:768-76; PMID:19553597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.077909.
30. 2 checkpoint mechanism. Neoplasia 2001; 3:411-9; PMID:11687952; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900175.
31. Krämer A, Mailand N, Lukas C, Syljuåsen RG, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA, et al. Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:884-91; PMID:15311285; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1165.
32. Puc J, Keniry M, Li HS, Pandita TK, Choudhury AD, Memeo L, et al. Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability. Cancer Cell 2005; 7:193-204; PMID:15710331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.009.
33. Tibelius A, Marhold J, Zentgraf H, Heilig CE, Neitzel H, Ducommun B, et al. Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1. J Cell Biol 2009; 185:1149-57; PMID:19546241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200810159.
34. Merry C, Fu K, Wang J, Yeh IJ, Zhang Y. Targeting the checkpoint kinase Chk1 in cancer therapy. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:279-83; PMID:20023404; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.2.10445.
35. 2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNAdamaging agents. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:21767-73; PMID:12676925; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300229200.
36. 1- and S-phase checkpoints in response to DNA damage. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13:738-47; PMID:11698191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00280-5.
37. 2 DNA-damage-response checkpoint. Cell 2008; 134:256-67; PMID:18662541; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2008.05.043.
38. Carrassa L, Sanchez Y, Erba E, Damia G. U2OS cells lacking Chk1 undergo aberrant mitosis and fail to activate the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13:1565-76; PMID:19778378.
39. Nagaoka SI, Hodges CA, Albertini DF, Hunt PA. Oocyte-specific differences in cell cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors. Curr Biol 2011; 21:651-7; PMID:21497085; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.003.
40. Ng CP, Lee HC, Ho CW, Arooz T, Siu WY, Lau A, et al. Differential mode of regulation of the checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 by their regulatory domains. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:8808-19; PMID:14681223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M312215200.
41. Golan A, Pick E, Tsvetkov L, Nadler Y, Kluger H, Stern DF. Centrosomal Chk2 in DNA damage responses and cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2647-56; PMID:20581449; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.13.12121.
42. Stolz A, Ertych N, Kienitz A, Vogel C, Schneider V, Fritz B, et al. The CHK2-BRCA1 tumour suppressor pathway ensures chromosomal stability in human somatic cells. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:492-9; PMID:20364141; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2051.
43. Lam MH, Liu Q, Elledge SJ, Rosen JM. Chk1 is haploinsufficient for multiple functions critical to tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 2004; 6:45-59; PMID:15261141; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.015.
44. Sun SC, Lee SE, Xu YN, Kim NH. Perturbation of Spc25 expression affects meiotic spindle organization, chromosome alignment and spindle assembly checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:4552-9; PMID:21084868; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.22.13815.
45. Tsafriri A, Chun SY, Zhang R, Hsueh AJ, Conti M. Oocyte maturation involves compartmentalization and opposing changes of cAMP levels in follicular somatic and germ cells: studies using selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Dev Biol 1996; 178:393-402; PMID:8812137; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996. 0226.
46. Gasser S, Orsulic S, Brown EJ, Raulet DH. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature 2005; 436:1186-90; PMID:15995699; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03884.