Network-based models as tools hinting at nonevident protein functionality

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 205-225

  Atilgan, Canan ^a   Okan, Osman Burak ^b   Atilgan, Ali Rana ^a  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Allosteric regulation; Bond orientational order; Coarse grained models; Collective motions; Dynamic heterogeneity; Protein stability in cellular proteomes

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84861411420     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: 19361238     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102305     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Aftabuddin M, Kundu S. 2007. Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and charged amino acid networks within protein. Biophys. J. 93:225-31
2. Agarwala R, Batzoglou S, Dancik V, Decatur SE, Hannenhalli S, et al. 1997. Local rules for protein folding on a triangular lattice and generalized hydrophobicity in the HP model. J. Comput. Biol. 4:275-96
3. Atilgan AR, Akan P, Baysal C. 2004. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 86:85-91
4. Atilgan AR, Aykut AO, Atilgan C. 2011. Subtle pH differences trigger single residue motions for moderating conformations of calmodulin. J. Chem. Phys. 135:155102
5. Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, Bahar I. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505-15
6. Atilgan AR, Turgut D, Atilgan C. 2007. Screened nonbonded interactions in native proteins manipulate optimal paths for robust residue communication. Biophys. J. 92:3052-62
7. Atilgan C, Atilgan AR. 2009. Perturbation-response scanning reveals ligand entry-exit mechanisms of ferric binding protein. PloS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000544
8. Atilgan C, Gerek ZN, Ozkan SB, Atilgan AR. 2010. Manipulation of conformational change in proteins by single-residue perturbations. Biophys. J. 99:933-43
9. Atilgan C, Okan OB, Atilgan AR. 2010. How orientational order governs collectivity of folded proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 78:3363-75
10. Baase WA, Gassner NC, Zhang X-J, Kuroki R, Weaver LH, et al. 1999. How much sequence variation can the functions of biological molecules tolerate? In Simplicity and Complexity in Proteins and Nucleic Acids, ed. H Frauenfelder, J Deisenhofer, PG Wolynes, pp. 297-311. Berlin: Dahlem Univ. Press
11. Backofen R, Will S. 2006. A constraint-based approach to fast and exact structure prediction in three-dimensional protein models. Constraints 11:5-30
12. Bagci Z, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. 2002. Residue packing in proteins: uniform distribution on a coarse-grained scale. J. Chem. Phys. 116:2269-76
13. Bagler G, Sinha S. 2007. Assortative mixing in protein contact networks and protein folding kinetics. Bioinformatics 23:1760-67
14. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2:173-81
15. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Yang LW, Eyal E. 2010. Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39:23-42
16. Balabin IA, Yang WT, Beratan DN. 2009. Coarse-grained modeling of allosteric regulation in protein receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:14253-58
17. Banerjee A, Jost J. 2009. Graph spectra as a systematic tool in computational biology. Discrete Appl. Math. 157:2425-31
18. Baysal C, Atilgan AR. 2001. Coordination topology and stability for the native and binding conformers of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 45:62-70
19. Baysal C, Atilgan AR. 2001. Elucidating the structural mechanisms for biological activity of the chemokine family. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 43:150-60
20. Bernhard S, Noe F. 2010. Optimal identification of semi-rigid domainsin macromolecules from molecular dynamics simulation. PLoS One 5:e10491
21. Berthier L. 2011. Dynamic heterogeneity in amorphous materials. Physics 4:42
22. Ceriotti M, Tribello GA, Parrinello M. 2011. Simplifying the representation of complex free-energy landscapes using sketch-map. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:13023-28
23. Chen YP, Lopez E, Havlin S, Stanley HE. 2006. Universal behavior of optimal paths in weighted networks with general disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:068702
24. Csermely P. 2008. Creative elements: network-based predictions of active centres in proteins and cellular and social networks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33:569-76
25. Csermely P, Sandhu KS, Hazai E, Hoksza Z, Kiss HJM, et al. 2012. Disordered proteins and network disorder in network descriptions of protein structure, dynamics and function: hypotheses and a comprehensive review. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13:19-33
26. Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Makowski M, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. 2011. Coarse-grained models of proteins: theory and applications. In Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling, ed. A Kolinski, pp. 35-84. New York: Springer
27. da Silveira CH, Pires DEV, Minardi RC, Ribeiro C, Veloso CJM, et al. 2009. Protein cutoff scanning: a comparative analysis of cutoff dependent and cutoff free methods for prospecting contacts in proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 74:727-43
28. David CC, Jacobs DJ. 2011. Characterizing protein motions from structure. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 31:41-56
29. Doruker P, Atilgan AR, Bahar I. 2000. Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to α-amylase inhibitor. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 40:512-24
30. Doster W, Busch S, Gaspar AM, Appavou MS, Wuttke J, Scheer H. 2010. Dynamical transition of protein-hydration water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104:098101
31. Feng Y, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A. 2008. Orientational distributions of contact clusters in proteins closely resemble those of an icosahedron. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 73:730-41
32. Ferguson SJ. 1991. Periplasm. In Prokaryotic Structure and Function: A New Perspective: 47th Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology, ed. S Mohan, C Dow, JA Coles, pp. 311-39. Edinburgh: Cambridge Univ. Press
33. Flores S, Echols N, Milburn D, Hespenheide B, Keating K, et al. 2006. The database of macromolecular motions: new features added at the decade mark. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:D296-301
34. Garcia-Moreno B. 2009. Adaptations of proteins to cellular and subcellular pH. J. Biol. 8:98
35. Garcia AE. 1992. Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:2696-99
36. Ghosh K, Dill K. 2010. Cellular proteomes have broad distributions of protein stability. Biophys. J. 99:3996-4002
37. Gupta AN, Vincent A, Neupane K, Yu H, Wang F, Woodside MT. 2011. Experimental validation of free-energy-landscape reconstruction from non-equilibrium single-molecule force spectroscopy measurements. Nat. Phys. 7:631-34
38. Halabi N, Rivoire O, Leibler S, Ranganathan R. 2009. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138:774-86
39. Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D. 2007. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450:964-72
40. Hilser VJ, Thompson EB. 2007. Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:8311-15
41. Hinsen K. 1998. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 33:417-29
42. Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA. 2011. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 475:316-23
43. Ikeguchi M, Ueno J, Sato M, Kidera A. 2005. Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:078102
44. Jarzynski C. 2011. Single-molecule experiments out of equilibrium. Nat. Phys. 7:591-92
45. Kantardjiev AA, Atanasov BP. 2009. PHEMTO: protein pH-dependent electric moment tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:W422-27
46. Khambati HK, Moraes TF, Singh J, Shouldice SR, Yu RH, Schryvers AB. 2010. The role of vicinal tyrosine residues in the function of Haemophilus influenzae ferric-binding protein A. Biochem. J. 432:57-64
47. Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Wu Z, Song G, Yang L, et al. 2009. Distance matrix-based approach to protein structure prediction. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 10:67-81
48. Kurkcuoglu O, Turgut OT, Cansu S, Jernigan RL, Doruker P. 2009. Focused functional dynamics of supramolecules by use of a mixed-resolution elastic network model. Biophys. J. 97:1178-87
49. Lee J, Natarajan M, Nashine VC, Socolich M, Vo T, et al. 2008. Surface sites for engineering allosteric control in proteins. Science 322:438-42
50. Leelananda SP, Towfic F, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A. 2011. Exploration of the relationship between topology and designability of conformations. J. Chem. Phys. 134:235101
51. Liang J, Dill KA. 2001. Are proteins well-packed? Biophys. J. 81:751-66
52. Liu T, Whitten ST, Hilser VJ. 2007. Functional residues serve a dominant role in mediating the cooper-ativity of the protein ensemble. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:4347-52
53. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R. 1999. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286:295-99
54. Martins ML, Ferreira SC, Vilela MJ. 2010. Multiscale models for biological systems. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 15:18-23
55. Mazack MJM, Cembran A, Gao JL. 2010. Internal dynamics of an analytically coarse-grained protein. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6:3601-12
56. Min W, English BP, Luo GB, Cherayil BJ, Kou SC, Xie XS. 2005. Fluctuating enzymes: lessons from single-molecule studies. Acc. Chem. Res. 38:923-31
57. Ming DM, Wall ME. 2006. Interactions in native binding sites cause a large change in protein dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 358:213-23
58. Newman MEJ. 2003. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67:026126
59. Okan OB, Atilgan AR, Atilgan C. 2009. Nanosecond motions in proteins impose bounds on the timescale distributions of local dynamics. Biophys. J. 97:2080-88
60. Park BH, Levitt M. 1995. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 249:493-507
61. Petrone P, Pande VS. 2006. Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes? Biophys. J. 90:1583-93
62. Potestio R, Aleksiev T, Pontiggia F, Cozzini S, Micheletti C. 2010. ALADYN: a web server for aligning proteins by matching their large-scale motion. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:W41-W45
63. Raghunathan G, Jernigan RL. 1997. Ideal architecture of residue packing and its observation in protein structures. Protein Sci. 6:2072-83
64. Rawat N, Biswas P. 2011. Shape, flexibility and packing of proteins and nucleic acids in complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13:9632-43
65. Sacquin-Mora S, Lavery R. 2009. Modeling the mechanical response of proteins to anisotropic deformation. Chemphyschem 10:115-18
66. Samiotakis A, Wittung-Stafshede P, Cheung MS. 2009. Folding, stability and shape of proteins in crowded environments: experimental and computational approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10:572-88
67. Samuni U, Dantsker D, Roche CJ, Friedman JM. 2007. Ligand recombination and a hierarchy of solvent slaved dynamics: the origin of kinetic phases in heme proteins. Gene 398:234-48
68. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, et al. 2010. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330:341-46
69. Srivastava J, Barber DL, Jacobson MP. 2007. Intracellular pH sensors: design principles and functional significance. Physiology 22:30-39
70. Steinhardt PJ, Nelson DR, Ronchetti M. 1981. Icosahedral bond orientational order in supercooled liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47:1297
71. Steinhardt PJ, Nelson DR, Ronchetti M. 1983. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28:784
72. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R. 2003. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:59-69
73. Tama F, Brooks CL. 2006. Symmetry, form, and shape: guiding principles for robustness in macromolec-ular machines. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35:115-33
74. Tama F, Sanejouand YH. 2001. Conformational changeofproteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng. 14:1-6
75. Tan KP, Varadarajan R, Madhusudhan MS. 2011. DEPTH: a web server to compute depth and predict small-molecule binding cavities in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:W242-48
76. Tartaglia GG, Vendruscolo M. 2010. Proteome-level interplay between folding and aggregation propensities of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 402:919-28
77. Thomas PD, Dill KA. 1996. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11628-33
78. Tirion MM. 1996. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77:1905-8
79. Tozzini V. 2010. Minimalist models for proteins: a comparative analysis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43:333-71
80. Trifonov EN, Frenkel ZM. 2009. Evolution of protein modularity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:335-40
81. Tsai CJ, Ma BY, Nussinov R. 1999. Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9970-72
82. Turgut D, Atilgan AR, Atilgan C. 2010. Assortative mixing in close-packed spatial networks. PLoS One 5:e15551
83. Vishveshwara S, Ghosh A, Hansia P. 2009. Intra and inter-molecular communications through protein structure network. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 10:146-60
84. Whitley MJ, Lee AL. 2009. Frameworks for understanding long-range intra-protein communication. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 10:116-27
85. Wylie CS, Shakhnovich EI. 2011. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:9916-21
86. Yang L-W, Chng C-P. 2008. Coarse-grained models reveal functional dynamics-I. Elastic network models\theories, comparisons and perspectives. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2:25-45
87. Yang L, Song G, Jernigan RL. 2007. How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models? Biophys. J. 93:920-29
88. Yilmaz LS, Atilgan AR. 2000. Identifying the adaptive mechanism in globular proteins: fluctuations in densely packed regions manipulate flexible parts. J. Chem. Phys. 113:4454-64
89. Zeldovich KB, Shakhnovich EI. 2008. Understanding protein evolution: from protein physics to Darwinian selection. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59:105-27
90. Zheng P, Cao Y, Bu TJ, Straus SK, Li HB. 2011. Single molecule force spectroscopy reveals that electrostatic interactions affect the mechanical stability of proteins. Biophys. J. 100:1534-41
91. Zheng WJ, Tekpinar M. 2009. Large-scale evaluation of dynamically important residues in proteins predicted by the perturbation analysis of a coarse-grained elastic model. BMC Struct. Biol. 9:45