A comparative study on material selection for micro-electromechanical systems

Materials and Design

Volumn 41, Issue , 2012, Pages 177-181

  Chauhan, Aditya ^b   Vaish, Rahul ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANDI   (India)

^b GALGOTIAS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; MATERIAL SELECTION; MATHEMATICAL CALCULATIONS; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE INDICES; SIMILAR MATERIAL; TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS;

CONTROL EQUIPMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MEMS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

MATERIALS PROPERTIES;

EID: 84861395881     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.037     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Judy J.W. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS): fabrication, design and applications. Smart Mater Struct 2001, 10:1115-1134.
2. Jahan A., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Mustapha F. Material screening and choosing methods - a review. Mater Des 2010, 31:696-705.
3. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 2004, 156:445-455.
4. Ashby M.F. Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Acta Mater 2000, 48:359-369.
5. Pratap R., Kumar A.A. Material selection for MEMS devices. Ind J Pure Appl Phys 2007, 45:358-367.
6. Guisbiers G. Wautelet, materials selection for micro-electromechanical systems. Mater Des 2007, 28:246-248.
7. Qian J., Zhao Y.P. Materials selection in mechanical design for microsensors and microactuators. Mater Des 2002, 23:619-625.
8. Parate O., Gupta N. Material selection for electrostatic microactuators using Ashby approach. Mater Des 2011, 32:1577-1581.
9. Reddy G.P., Gupta N. Material selection for microelectronic heat sinks: an application of the Ashby approach. Mater Des 2010, 31:113-117.
10. Xuebin L. Study of multi-objective optimization and multi-attribute decision-making for economic and environmental power dispatch. Electric Pow Syst Res 2009, 79:789-795.
11. Srikar V.T., Spearing S.M. Materials selection in micromechanical design: an application of the Ashby approach. J Microelectromech Syst 2003, 12:3-10.
12. Spearing S.M. Materials issues in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Acta Mater 2000, 48:179-196.
13. Sharpe W.N., Bagdahn J., Jackson K., Coles G. Tensile testing of MEMS materials-recent progress. J Mater Sci 2003, 38:4075-4079.
14. Milani A.S., Shanian A., Madoliat R., Nemes J.A. The effect of normalisation norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2005, 29:312-318.
15. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Euro J Oper Res 2007, 178:514-529.
16. Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. Int J Ind Eng Comput 2011, 2:831-850.
17. Chauhan A., Vaish R. Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater Des 2012, 36:1-5.