Power to the people: A wiki-governance model for biobanks

Genome Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Dove, Edward S ^a   Joly, Yann ^a   Knoppers, Bartha M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biobank; Collaboration; Genomics; Governance; Networks; Public participation; Social media; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLITICAL SYSTEM; CANADA; CONSUMER; ETHICS; LEGAL ASPECT; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC OPINION;

CANADA; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GENOMICS; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; TISSUE BANKS;

EID: 84861354533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-158     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Hunter KG, Laurie G. Involving publics in biobank governance: Moving beyond existing approaches. The Governance of Genetic Information: Who Decides? 2009, 151-177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Widdows H.
2. Burgess M, O'Doherty K, Secko D. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Per Med 2009, 5:285-296.
3. Avard D, Bucci LM, Burgess MM, Kaye J, Heeney C, Cambon-Thomsen A. Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: points to consider. J Public Deliberation 2009, 5:2-21., http://services.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=jpd
4. Dove ES. The genetic privacy carousel: a discourse on proposed genetic privacy bills and the co-evolution of law and science. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2011, 9:252-263.
5. Marris C, Rose N. Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000549. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549, 2994659, 21151343.
6. Xenos MA, Becker AB, Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA. Stimulating upstream engagement: an experimental study of nanotechnology information seeking. Soc Sci Q 2011, 92:1191-1214.
7. Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A 2012, 158A:1029-1037. 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414, 22438108.
8. O'Doherty KC, Burgess MM, Edwards K, Gallagher RP, Hawkins AK, Kaye J, McCaffrey V, Winickoff DE. From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Soc Sci Med 2011, 73:367-374. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.046, 21726926.
9. Kaye J, Gibbons SMC, Heeney C, Parker M, Smart A. Governing Biobanks: Understanding the Interplay between Law and Practice 2012, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
10. Gottweis H, Chen H, Starkbaum J. Biobanks and the phantom public. Hum Genet 2011, 130:433-440. 10.1007/s00439-011-1065-y, 21773770.
11. Laurie G. Reflexive governance in biobanking: on the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law. Hum Genet 2011, 130:347-356. 10.1007/s00439-011-1066-x, 21766192.
12. Hagendijk R, Irwin A. Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 2006, 44:167-184.
13. Greely HT. Ethical issues in the Human Genome Diversity Project. The Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology 2000, 1:552-566. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Murray TH, Mehlman MJ.
14. Rose H. An ethical dilemma. The rise and fall of UmanGenomics - the model biotech company?. Nature 2003, 425:123-124. 10.1038/425123a, 12968150.
15. Cardinal G, Deschênes M. Surveying the population biobankers. Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives 2003, 37-94. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, Knoppers BM.
16. Pálsson G. The rise and fall of a biobank: the case of Iceland. Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective 2008, 41-55. London and New York: Routledge, Gottweis H, Petersen A.
17. McHale JV. Accountability, governance and biobanks: the ethics and governance committee as guardian or as toothless tiger?. Health Care Anal 2011, 19:231-246. 10.1007/s10728-011-0195-7, 21938513.
18. Winickoff DE. From benefit sharing to power sharing: partnership governance in population genomics research. Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance 2009, 53-66. Farnham: Ashgate, Kaye J, Stranger M.
19. Winickoff DE. Partnership in UK Biobank: a third way for genomic property?. J Law Med Ethics 2007, 35:440-456. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00166.x, 17714253.
20. Knoppers BM, Chadwick R. Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6:75-79. 10.1038/nrg1505, 15630423.
21. Gottweis H, Gaskell G, Starkbaum J. Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:738-739. 10.1038/nrg3083, 22005975.
22. Onyx J, Kenny S, Brown K. Active citizenship: an empirical investigation. Social Policy Soc 2011, 11:55-66.
23. Gottweis H, Lauss G. Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization. J Community Genet 2012, 3:61-72. 10.1007/s12687-011-0070-0, 3312942, 22147279.
24. Noveck BS. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful 2009, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25. Gibbons SMC. Regulating biobanks: a twelve-point typological tool. Med Law Rev 2009, 17:313-346. 10.1093/medlaw/fwp016, 19671622.
26. Gibbons SMC, Kaye J, Smart A, Heeney C, Parker M. Governing genetic databases: challenges facing research regulation and practice. J Law Soc 2007, 34:163-189.
27. Zittrain J. The lessons of Wikipedia. The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It 2008, 127-148. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Salzberg SL. Genome re-annotation: a wiki solution?. Genome Biol 2007, 8:102. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r102, 1839116, 17274839.
29. Mons B, Ashburner M, Chichester C, van Mulligen E, Weeber M, den Dunnen J, van Ommen GJ, Musen M, Cockerill M, Hermjakob H, Mons A, Packer A, Pacheco R, Lewis S, Berkeley A, Melton W, Barris N, Wales J, Meijssen G, Moeller E, Roes PJ, Borner K, Bairoch A. Calling on a million minds for community annotation in WikiProteins. Genome Biol 2008, 9:R89. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r89, 2441475, 18507872.
30. Hoehndorf R, Bacher J, Backhaus M, Gregorio SE, Loebe F, Prüfer K, Uciteli A, Visagie J, Herre H, Kelso J. BOWiki: an ontology-based wiki for annotation of data and integration of knowledge in biology. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 5):S5. 2788356, 19958515.
31. Stehr H, Duarte JM, Lappe M, Bhak J, Bolser DM. PDBWiki: added value through community annotation of the Protein Data Bank. Database (Oxford) 2010, 2010:baq009.
32. Stokes TH, Torrance JT, Li H, Wang MD. ArrayWiki: an enabling technology for sharing public microarray data repositories and meta-analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 6):S18. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S6-S18, 2638158, 19091017.
33. Das S, Girard L, Green T, Weitzman L, Lewis-Bowen A, Clark T. Building biomedical web communities using a semantically aware content management system. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10:129-138. 10.1093/bib/bbn052, 19060302.
34. Irwin A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development 1995, New York: Routledge.
35. Weldon S. 'Public consent' or 'scientific citizenship'? What counts as public participation in population based biobanks?. Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA 2004, 161-181. London: Routledge, Tutton R, Corrigan O.
36. Corbyn Z. Could crowd sourcing provide the next genetics breakthrough? , http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/12/could_crowd_sourcing_provide_t.html
37. Kaye J, Curren L, Anderson N, Edwards K, Fullerton SM, Kanellopoulou N, Lund D, Macarthur DG, Mascalzoni D, Shepherd J, Taylor PL, Terry SF, Winter SF. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:371-376. 10.1038/nrg3218, 22473380.
38. Arita M. A pitfall of wiki solution for biological databases. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10:295-296.
39. Saha K, Hurlbut JB. Treat donors as partners in biobank research. Nature 2011, 478:312-313. 10.1038/478312a, 22012372.
40. Kosslyn SM. On the evolution of human motivation: the role of social prosthetic systems. Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 541-554. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Platek SM, Shackelford TK, Keenan JP.
41. Stranger M, Kaye J. Governing biobanks: an introduction. Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance 2009, 1-12. Franham: Ashgate, Kaye J, Stranger M.
42. Hapgood R, McCabe C, Shickle D. Public preferences for participation in a large DNA cohort study: a discrete choice experiment. Discussion paper series 04/5 2004, Sheffield: University of Sheffield ScHARR (School of Health and Related Research), Sheffield Health Economics Group.
43. Levitt M. Relating to participants: how close do biobanks and donors really want to be?. Health Care Anal 2011, 19:220-230. 10.1007/s10728-011-0193-9, 21915714.
44. Pateman C. Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives Politics 2012, 10:7-19.
45. van der Merwe R, Meehan A. Direct deliberative governance online: consensual problem solving or accommodated pluralism?. J Information Technol Politics 2012, 9:46-63.
46. Stromer-Galley J, Webb N, Muhlberger P. Deliberative e-rulemaking project: challenges to enacting real world deliberation. J Information Technol Politics 2012, 9:82-96.
47. Özdemir V, Faraj SA, Knoppers BM. Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight. OMICS 2011, 15:637-646. 10.1089/omi.2011.0087, 21848419.
48. Petsko GA. The wisdom, and madness, of crowds. Genome Biol 2008, 9:112. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-11-112, 2614482, 19090959.
49. Papaioannou T. Democratic governance of genomics: the case of UK Biobank. New Genet Soc 2012, 31:111-133.
50. Kaye J. From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance. Hum Genet 2011, 130:377-382. 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0, 3155683, 21785980.
51. Chalmers D. Genetic research and biobanks. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 675:1-37. 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_1, 20949382.
52. Lehoux P. Moving beyond our mutual ignorance. Or, how would engaging the public benefit the personalized medicine community?. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2011, 9:76-79.
53. Unger R. What Should Legal Analysis Become? 1999, London: Verso.
54. Hoeyer K. Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity. Public Health Genomics 2010, 13:345-352. 10.1159/000262329, 19940458.
55. Knoppers BM, Harris JR, Tassé AM, Budin-Ljøsne I, Kaye J, Deschênes M, Zawati MH. Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research. Genome Med 2011, 3:46. 10.1186/gm262, 3221544, 21787442.
56. Rial-Sebbag E, Cambon-Thomsen A. The emergence of biobanks in the legal landscape: towards a new model of governance. J Law Soc 2012, 39:113-130. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00573.x, 22530248.
57. Joly Y, Dove ES, Kennedy KL, Bobrow M, Ouellette BFF, Dyke SOM, Kato K, Knoppers BM. Open science and community norms: data retention and publication moratoria policies in genomics projects. Med Law Int
58. P3G. , http://p3g.org
59. P3G Observatory. , http://www.p3gobservatory.org/datashield/summary.htm
60. EnCoRe. , http://www.encore-project.info/
61. ORCID. , http://about.orcid.org/
62. G2P Knowledge Centre. , http://www.gen2phen.org/groups/brif-bio-resource-impact-factor
63. Cambon-Thomsen A, Thorisson GA, Mabile L. The role of a Bioresource Research Impact Factor as an incentive to share human bioresources. Nat Genet 2011, 43:503-504. 10.1038/ng.831, 21614086.
64. Kaye J, Meslin EM, Knoppers BM, Juengst ET, Deschênes M, Cambon-Thomsen A, Chalmers D, De Vries J, Edwards K, Hoppe N, Kent A, Adebamowo C, Marshall P, Kato K. ELSI 2.0 for genomics and society. Science 2012, 336:673-674. 10.1126/science.1218015, 22582247.
65. Knoppers BM. Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems?. Hum Genet 2009, 125:375-379. 10.1007/s00439-009-0644-7, 19252928.
66. Zwart H. Genomics and identity: the bioinformatisation of human life. Med Health Care Philos 2009, 12:125-136. 10.1007/s11019-009-9187-x, 19242821.
67. Sándor J, Bárd P, Tamburrini C, Tännsjö T. The case of biobank with the law: between a legal and scientific fiction. J Med Ethics 2012, 38:347-350. 10.1136/jme.2010.041632, 21947810.
68. Watson PH, Barnes RO. A proposed schema for classifying human research biobanks. Biopreserv Biobank 2011, 9:327-333.
69. Council of E. Recommendation Rec(2006)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Research on Biological Materials of Human Origin 2006, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
70. Dove ES, Black L, Avard D, Knoppers BM. Privacy in Canadian paediatric biobanks: a changing landscape. A report delivered to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada , http://www.humgen.org/int/GI/Privacy_in_Canadian_paediatric_Biobanks.pdf
71. Do Tank. , http://dotank.nyls.edu/
72. WikiVote. , http://www.wikivote.ru/
73. Economist S. Citizen lawmaking: Government by (all) the people. Economist 2011, 73., http://www.economist.com/node/21534760
74. Crowdexpert. , http://edu.crowdexpert.ru/node/64
75. Osalusveeb. , https://www.osale.ee/
76. New York Times S. The 7th annual year in ideas. NY Times (Print) 2007, 80., http://www.nytimes.com
77. e-Democracia. , http://edemocracia.camara.gov.br/