Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: Points to consider

Journal of Public Deliberation

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Avard, Denise ^a   Bucci, Lucie M ^a   Burgess, Michael M ^b   Kaye, Jane ^c   Heeney, Catherine ^c   Farmer, Yanick ^a   Cambon Thomsen, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biobanks; Deliberative democracy; Ethics; Policy; Population health; Public participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 68449097072     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abelson, J. & Eyles, J. (2002). Public Participation and Citizen Governance in the Canadian Health System (Rep. No. Discussion Paper No.7). Ottawa: Commission of the Future of Health Care in Canada.
2. Abelson, J., Forest, P. G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc.Sci.Med., 57, 239-251.
3. Abelson, J. & Gauvin, F. P. (2006). Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence, and Policy Implications Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network Inc.
4. - & -. (2004). Transparency, Trust and Citizen Engagement: What Canadians are Saying About Accountability (Rep. No. P 05). Ottawa,ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
5. Akesson, A., Bjellerup, P., & Vahter, M. (1999). Evaluation of kits for measurement of the soluble transferrin receptor. Scand.J.Clin.Lab Invest, 59, 77-81.
6. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35, 215-224.
7. Barbour, V. (2003). UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol? Lancet, 361, 1734-1738.
8. Boote, J., Telford, R., & Cooper, C. (2002). Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 61, 213-236.
9. Brand, A. M. & Probst-Hensch, N. M. (2007). Biobanking for epidemiological research and public health. Pathobiology, 74, 227-238.
10. Burgess, M. & O'Doherty, K. (2007). Deliberative Public Engagement Related to Governing Biobanks- Final Report University of British Columbia: W.Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics.
11. Burgess, M., O'Doherty, K., & Secko, D. (2008). Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Personalized Medicine, 5, 285-296.
12. Busby, H. (2006). Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood in the UK. Sociol.Health Illn., 28, 850-865.
13. Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nat.Rev.Genet., 5, 866-873.
14. Cambon-Thomsen, A., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Knoppers, B. M. (2007). Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur.Respir.J., 30, 373-382.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). 10 Years of Public Health Genomics at CDC 1997-2007 National Office of Public Health Genomics in the Coordinating Center for Health Promotion: Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention.
16. Cragg Ross Dawson (2000). Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples Medical Research Council and The Wellcome Trust.
17. Gauvin, F. P. & Abelson, J. (2006). Primer on Public Involvement Toronto: Health Council of Canada.
18. Godard, B., Marshall, J., & Laberge, C. (2007). Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project. Community Genet., 10, 147-158.
19. Godard, B., Marshall, J., Laberge, C., & Knoppers, B. M. (2004). Strategies for consulting with the community: the cases of four large-scale genetic databases. Sci.Eng Ethics, 10, 457-477.
20. Gramberger, M. (2001). Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making Paris: OECD.
21. Greely, H. T. (2007). The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annu.Rev.Genomics Hum.Genet., 8, 343-364.
22. Gwinn, M. & Khoury, M. J. (2006). Genomics and public health in the United States: signposts on the translation highway. Community Genet., 9, 21-26.
23. Haddow, G. (2004). Donor and nondonor families' accounts of communication and relations with healthcare professionals. Prog.Transplant., 14, 41-48.
24. Haddow, G., Cunningham-Burley, S., Bruce, A., & Parry, S. (2004). Generation Scotland Preliminary Consultation Exercise 2003-04 Public and Stakeholder Views from Focus Groups and Interviews Edinburgh: Innogen, University of Edinburgh.
25. Haimes, E. & Whong-Barr, M. (2007). Competing Perspectives on Reasons for Participation and Non-participation in the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. In B.M.Knoppers (Ed.), Population and genetics: Legal Socio-Ethical Perspectives (pp. 199-216). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
26. Health Canada & Health Products & Food Branch (2004). Public Involvement Framework Office of Consumer and Public Involvement: Health Canada.
27. Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419-436.
28. International Association for Public Participation (2005). IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum Denver CO.
29. Khoury, M. J., Burke, W., & Thomson, E. J. (2000). Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century. Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Knoppers, B. M., Joly, Y., Simard, J., & Durocher, F. (2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. Eur.J.Hum.Genet..
31. Lanie, A. D., Jayaratne, T. E., & Sheldon, J. P. K. S. L. A. E. S. F. M. (2004). Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts. Journal Genetic Counselling, 13, 305-320.
32. Levitt, M. & Weldon, S. (2005). A well placed trust?: Public perceptions of the governance of DNA databases. Critical Public Health, 15, 311-321.
33. Longstaff, H., Burgess, M., & Lewis, P. (2006). Comparing methods of ethical consultation for biotechnology related issues. Health Law Rev., 15, 37-38.
34. McBride, C. M., Alford, S. H., Reid, R. J., Larson, E. B., Baxevanis, A. D., & Brody, L. C. (2008). Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics. Nat.Genet., 40, 939-942.
35. OECD (2001). Engaging Citizens in Policy-making: information, Consultation and Public Participation Paris: OECD.
36. - (2006). Creation and Governance of Human Genetic Research Databases OECD Publishing.
37. People Science & Policy Ltd (2002). Biobank UK: A Question of Trust: A consultation exploring and addressing questions of public trust London: The Medical Research Council & The Wellcome Trust.
38. Petersen, A. (2005b). Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociol.Health Illn., 27, 271-292.
39. - (2005a). Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociol.Health Illn., 27, 271-292.
40. Racine, E. (2003). Discourse ethics as an ethics of responsibility: comparison and evaluation of citizen involvement in population genomics. J.Law Med.Ethics, 31, 390-397.
41. Reilly, P. R. (2000). Public concern about genetics. Annu.Rev.Genomics Hum.Genet., 1, 485-506.
42. Robling, M. R., Hood, K., Houston, H., Pill, R., Fay, J., & Evans, H. M. (2004). Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J.Med.Ethics, 30, 104-109.
43. Rowe G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology,& Human Values, 29, 88-121.
44. Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 3-29.
45. - & - (2004). Evaluating Public-participation exercises: a research agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29, 512-556.
46. - & - (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30, 251-290.
47. Saunders, C., Crossing, S., Girgis, A., Butow, P., & Penman, A. (2007). Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Aust.New Zealand.Health Policy, 4, 13.
48. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, H. a. S. (2007). Policy Issues Associated with Undertaking a New Large U.S.Population Cohort Study of Genes, Environment, and Disease Washington DC: Department of Health & Human Services.
49. Smith, B. H., Campbell, H., Blackwood, D., Connell, J., Connor, M., Deary, I. J. et al. (2006). Generation Scotland: the Scottish Family Health Study; a new resource for researching genes and heritability. BMC.Med.Genet., 7, 74.
50. Swede, H., Stone, C. L., & Norwood, A. R. (2007). National population-based biobanks for genetic research. Genet.Med., 9, 141-149.
51. Tallon, D., Chard, J., & Dieppe, P. (2000). Consumer involvement in research is essential. BMJ, 320, 380-381.
52. The Wellcome Trust and MRC (2000). Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples. Summary Report London: The Wellcome Trust.
53. Turnbull, L. & Aucoin, P. (2006). Fostering Canadians' Role in Public Policy: A Strategy for Institutionalizing Public Involvement in Policy (Rep. No. P/07, 42670). Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc (CPRN).
54. Tutton, R. (2007). Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases Citizenship, Governance, and Ambivalence. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32, 172-195.
55. Tutton, R. & Corrigan, O. (2004). Introduction Public Participation in Genetic Databases. In R.Tutton & O. Corrigan (Eds.), Genetic Databases: Socioethical issues in the collection and use of DNA (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
56. Weldon, S. (2004). 'Public consent' or 'scientific citizenship' What counts as public participation in population-based DNA collections? In R.Tutton & O. Corrigan (Eds.), Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA (pp. 161-180). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
57. World Health Organization (2006). Ninth Futures Forum on health systems governance and public participation Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
58. Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science--hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genet., 9, 211-220.
59. Yuille, M., van Ommen, G. J., Brechot, C., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Dagher, G., Landegren, U. et al. (2008). Biobanking for Europe. Brief.Bioinform., 9,14-24.