Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight

OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 637-646

  Ozdemir, Vural ^a   Faraj, Samer A ^b   Knoppers, Bartha M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BIOMICS; FUNDING; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VACCINOMICS;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC OPINION; VACCINATION; VACCINES;

EID: 80052779414     PISSN: 15362310     EISSN: 15578100     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0087     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Adamczyk-Poplawska, M., Markowicz, S., and Jagusztyn- Krynicka, E.K. (2011). Proteomics for development of vaccine. J Proteomics Feb 20. [Epub ahead of print].
2. Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., and Guston, D.H. (2008). Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement and integration. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 979-1000.
3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London).
4. Bell, S., and Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
5. Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).
6. Bernstein, A., Pulendran, B., and Rappuoli, R. (2011). Systems vaccinomics: The road ahead for vaccinology. OMICS 15(9).
7. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., and Pinch, T.J. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
8. Bimber, B. (1996). The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
9. Brooks, H., and Bowers, R. (1970). The assessment of technology. Science 222, 13-20.
10. Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci 15, 555-568. (Pubitemid 39453864)
11. Chi, K.S. (2008). Four Strategies to Transform State Governance (IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC).
12. Chia, R. (2004). Re-educating attention: what is foresight and how is it cultivated? In Managing the Future: Foresight in the Knowledge Economy. H. Tsoukas and J. Shepard, eds. (Blackwell, Malden, MA), pp. 21-37.
13. Choi, B.C., Pang, T., Lin, V., et al. (2005). Can scientists and policy makers work together? Epidemiol Community Health 59, 632-637. (Pubitemid 41081448)
14. Collinridge, D. (1980). The Social Control of Technology (St. Martin's Press, New York).
15. Cook, S.D.N., and Brown, J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10, 381-400.
16. Douma, K.F., Karsenberg, K., Hummel, M.J., Bueno-de- Mesquita, J.M., and van Harten, W.H. (2007). Methodology of constructive technology assessment in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23, 162-168. (Pubitemid 46642723)
17. Einsiedel, E.F. (2011). Publics and vaccinomics: Beyond public understanding of science. OMICS 15(9).
18. Epstein, G.L. (2009). Restart the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Sci Progr. Available at .org/2009/03/restart-ota/ (accessed June 1, 2011).
19. Faraj, S., Kwon, D., and Watts, S. (2004). Contested artifact: technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser. Inform Technol People 17, 186-209.
20. Faraj, S., and Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Appl Psychol 94, 604-617.
21. Funtowicz, S.O., and Ravetz, J.R. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. R. Costanza, ed. (Columbia University Press, New York), pp. 137-152.
22. Gaskell, G., Einsiedel, E., Hallman, W., Priest, S.H., Jackson, J., and Olsthoorn, J. (2005). Communication. Social values and the governance of science. Science 310, 1908-1909. (Pubitemid 43005973)
23. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge (Sage, London).
24. Giles, J. (2011). Social science lines up its biggest challenges. ''Top ten'' crucial questions set research priorities for the field. Nature 470, 18-19.
25. Giri, P.K., Kruh, N.A., Dobos, K.M., and Schorey, J.S. (2010). Proteomic analysis identifies highly antigenic proteins in exosomes from M. tuberculosis-infected and culture filtrate protein-treated macrophages. Proteomics 10, 3190-3202.
26. Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation. The historical construction of an analytical framework. Sci Technol Hum Values 31, 639-667.
27. Goodman, C. (2004). Introduction to Health Technology Assessment (The Lewin Group, Falls Church, VA). Guston, D.H. (1992). The demise of the social contract for science. Misconduct in science and the nonmodern world. In Program in Science, Technology, and Society. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working paper number 19.
28. Guston, D.H., and Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24, 93-109. (Pubitemid 34290508)
29. Guston, D. (2007). Toward anticipatory governance. Available at http://nanohub.org/resources/3270 (accessed March 28, 2011).
30. Healy, P., and Dean, C. (2007). Clinton says she would shield science from politics. New York Times, October 5. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/ 2007/10/05/us/politics/05clinton.html?-orelogin (accessed June 1, 2011).
31. Holt, R. (2009). Reversing the congressional science lobotomy. Wired, April 29. Available at 2009/04/fromthefields-holt/ (accessed June 1, 2011).
32. Huzair, F., Borda-Rodriguez, A., and Upton M. (2011). Twentyfirst century vaccinomics innovation systems: Capacity building in the global south and the role of product development partnerships (PDPs). OMICS 15(9).
33. Ingram, H., and McDonald, B. (2002). The precautionary principle, science wars, and the Earth Summit. Politics Life Sci 21, 56-60. (Pubitemid 38065125)
34. Ingram, H., Schneider, A., and McDonald, B. (2004) The political invasion of science: How policy constructs boundaries and meanings. Italian Rev Public Policy 2, 5-28.
35. Irwin, A. (1989). Deciding about risk: expert testimony and the regulation of hazard. In Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis and Management. J. Brown, ed. (Belhaven, New York), pp. 19-32.
36. Irwin, A. (2008). STS perspectives on scientific governance. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and Wajcman, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). pp. 583-607.
37. Jasanoff, S. (1997). Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understand Sci 6, 221-232.
38. Jasanoff, S. (2006). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (Routledge, London).
39. Jasanoff, S. (2007). Technologies of humility. Nature 450, 33. (Pubitemid 350070552)
40. Knoppers, B.M. (2009). Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems? Hum Genet 125, 375-379.
41. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
42. Kolker, E. (2011). Special issue on data-intensive science. OMICS 15, 197-198.
43. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
44. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
45. Lehoux, P. (2011). Moving beyond our mutual ignorance. Or, how would engaging the public benefit the personalized medicine community? Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 9, 76-79.
46. Livingston, D. (1970). International technology assessment and the United Nations system. Am J Int Law 64, 163-172.
47. Macfarlane, A. (2003). Underlying Yucca Mountain: The interplay of geology and policy in nuclear waste disposal. Soc Stud Sci 33, 783-807. (Pubitemid 38091959)
48. Marmot, M.G. (2004). Evidence based policy or policy based evidence? BMJ 328, 906-907.
49. Marris, C., and Rose, N. (2010). Open engagement: Exploring public participation in the biosciences. PLoS Biol 8(11), e1000549.
50. McGrail, S. (2010). Nano dreams and nightmares: Emerging technoscience and the framing and (re)interpreting of the future, present and past. J Futures Stud 14, 23-48.
51. Merton, R.K. (1968). Science and Democratic Social Structure. Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York), pp. 604-615.
52. Miles, I. (2010). The development of technology foresight: A review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77, 1448-1456.
53. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity Press, Cambridge, MA).
54. Ogburn, W.F. (1922). Social Change (Dell, New York).
55. O'Meara, M.M., and Disis, M.L. (2011). Therapeutic cancer vaccines and translating vaccinomics science to the global health clinic: Emerging applications towards proof-of-concept. OMICS 15(9).
56. Ommer, R., Wynne, B., Downey, R., et al. (2011). Pathways to Integration (Genome British Columbia GSEAC Subcommittee on Pathways to Integration, Vancouver).
57. Owen, R., and Goldberg, N. (2010). Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Anal 30, 1699-1707.
58. Ozdemir, V. (2009). What to do when the risk environment is rapidly shifting and heterogeneous? Anticipatory governance and real-time assessment of social risks in multiply marginalized populations can prevent IRB mission creep, ethical inflation or underestimation of risks. Am J Bioeth 9, 65-68.
59. Ozdemir, V., Suarez-Kurtz, G., Stenne, R., et al. (2009). Risk assessment and communication tools for genotype associations with multifactorial phenotypes: The concept of ''edge effect'' and cultivating an ethical bridge between omics innovations and society. OMICS 13, 43-61.
60. Ozdemir, V., Armengaud, J., Dubé, L., Aziz, R.K., and Knoppers, B.M. (2010). Nutriproteomics and proteogenomics: Cultivating two novel hybrid fields of personalized medicine with added societal value. Curr Pharmacogenomics PersonMed 8, 240-243.
61. Ozdemir, V., Smith, C., Bongiovanni, K., et al. (2011a). Policy and data-intensive scientific discovery in the beginning of the 21st century. OMICS 15, 221-225.
62. Ozdemir, V., Muljono, D.H., Pang, T., et al. (2011b). Asia-Pacific Health 2020 and genomics without borders: Co-production of knowledge by science and society partnership for global personalizedmedicine. Curr Pharmacogenomics PersonMed 9, 1-5.
63. Poland, GA. (2007). Pharmacology, vaccinomics, and the second golden age of vaccinology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82, 623-626. (Pubitemid 350114819)
64. Poland, G.A., Ovsyannikova, I.G., Jacobson, R.M., and Smith, D.I. (2007). Heterogeneity in vaccine immune response: The role of immunogenetics and the emerging field of vaccinomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82, 653-664. (Pubitemid 350114830)
65. Poland, G.A., Ovsyannikova, I.G., and Jacobson, R.M. (2009). Application of pharmacogenomics to vaccines. Pharmacogenomics 10, 837-852.
66. Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1, 54-74.
67. Quay, R. (2010). Anticipatory governance-a tool for climate change adaptation. J Am Plann Assoc 76, 496-511.
68. Ratcliffe, J. (2002). Scenario planning: strategic interviews and conversations. Foresight 4, 19-30. (Pubitemid 38963504)
69. Ravetz, J.R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
70. Ravetz, J.R. (1987). Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. Sci Commun 9, 87-116.
71. Rip, A., Misa, T., and Schot, J. (1995). Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment (Pinter Publishers, London).
72. Saltelli, A., and Funtowicz, S. (2004). The Precautionary Principle: implications for risk management strategies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17, 47-57. (Pubitemid 38480453)
73. Schoemaker, P.J.H., and van der Heijden, C.A.J.M. (1992). Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell. Planning Rev 20, 41-47.
74. Sclove, R. (2010). Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC).
75. Selin, C. (2008). The sociology of the future: Tracing stories of technology and time. Sociol Compass 2, 1878-1895.
76. Taleb, N.N. (2010). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, 2nd ed. (Random House, New York).
77. Tallacchini, M. (2005). Before and beyond the precautionary principle: Epistemology of uncertainty in science and law. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207(2 Suppl), 645-651.
78. Thomas, C., and Moridani, M. (2010). Interindividual variations in the efficacy and toxicity of vaccines. Toxicology 278, 204-210.
79. Turnpenny, J., Lorenzoni, I., and Jones, M. (2009). Noisy and definitely not normal: Responding to wicked issues in the environment, energy and health. Environ Sci Policy 12, 347-358.
80. Turnpenny, J., Jones, M., and Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Hum Values 2010 [Epub ahead of print] Dec 7, 2010. doi: 10.1177/0162243910385789.
81. van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios, the Art of Strategic Conversation (Wiley, London).
82. Veblen, T. (1914). The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts (Macmillan, New York).
83. Wynne, B. (1992a). Uncertainty and environmental learning. Global Environ Change 2, 111-127.
84. Wynne, B. (1992b). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understand Sci 1, 281-304.
85. Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology N. Lash, S. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, eds. (Sage, New York), pp. 44-83.
86. Wynne, B. (2010). When doubt becomes a weapon. Nature 466, 441-442.
87. Yearley, S. (1992). The Green Case (Routledge, London), pp. 32- 33, 46.
88. Yearley, S. (2000). Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Understand Sci 9, 105-122.
89. Yearley, S. (2005). Making Sense of Science (Sage, London).