From patients to partners: Participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 371-376

  Kaye, Jane ^a   Curren, Liam ^a   Anderson, Nick ^b   Edwards, Kelly ^c   Fullerton, Stephanie M ^c   Kanellopoulou, Nadja ^a   Lund, David ^d   MacArthur, Daniel G ^e   Mascalzoni, Deborah ^f   Shepherd, James ^g   Taylor, Patrick L ^j   Terry, Sharon F ^h   Winter, Stefan F ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HW COMMUNICATIONS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY   (Italy)

^g CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h GENETIC ALLIANCE   (United States)

ⁱ HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^j NONE

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PARTICIPANT CENTER INITIATIVE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL MEDIA;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PRIVACY; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84859900558     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg3218     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Mascalzoni, D. et al. Consenting in population genomics as an open communication process. Stud. Ethics Law Tech. 3, 2 (2009).
2. McGuire, A., Caulfield, T. & Cho, M. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 152-156 (2008).
3. Wagstaff, A. International biobanking regulations: the promise and the pitfalls. Cancer World 42, 23-29 (2011).
4. Schulte in den Bäumen, T., Paci, D. & Ibarreta, D. Data protection and sample management in biobanking-a legal dichotomy. Genomics Soc. Policy 6, 33-46 (2010).
5. Kaye, J. From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance. Hum. Genet. 130, 377-382 (2011).
6. Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries J., Boddington P. &Kaye, J. Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Pub. Health Gen. 14, 17-25 (2010).
7. Kaye, J. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9 Mar 2012 (doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454).
8. Brown, I., Brown, L. & Korff, D. Using patient data for research without consent. Law Inn. Tech. 2, 219-258 (2010).
9. Trinidad, S. B. et al. Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Genet. Med. 12, 486-495 (2010).
10. Shelton, R. H. Electronic consent channels: preserving patient privacy without handcuffing researchers. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 69cm4 (2011).
11. Terry, S. F. & Terry, P. F. Power to the people: participant ownership of clinical trial data. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 69cm3 (2011).
12. Bourgeois, F. C., Taylor, P. L., Emans, S. J., Nigrin, D. J. & Mandl, K. D. Whose personal control? Creating private, personally controlled health records for pediatric and adolescent patients. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 737-743 (2008).
13. Feied, C. F. et al. Clinical information systems: instant ubiquitous clinical data for error reduction and improved clinical outcomes. Acad. Emerg. Med. 11, 1162-1169 (2004).
14. Porter, S. C., Forbes, P., Manzi, S. & Kalish, L. Patients providing the answers: narrowing the gap in data quality for emergency care. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19, 1-5 (2010).
15. Mahoney, C. D., Berard-Collins, C. M., Coleman, R., Amaral, J. F. & Cotter, C. M. Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 64, 1969-1977 (2007).
16. Baker, L. C. Benefits of interoperability: a closer look at the estimates. Health Aff. 19 Jan 2005 (doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w5.22).
17. Walker, J. et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff. 19 Jan 2005 (doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10).
18. Hook, J. M., Pan, E., Adler-Milstein, J., Bu, D. &Walker, J. The value of healthcare information exchange and interoperability in New York state. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2006, 953 (2006).
19. Teich, J. M. The benefits of sharing clinical information. Ann. Emerg. Med. 31, 274-276 (1998).
20. Wicks, P., Vaughan, T. E., Massagli, M. P. &Heywood, J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nature Biotech. 29, 411-414 (2011).
21. Do, C. B. et al. Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002141 (2011).
22. Cross, M. BMA warns against letting patients have access to their electronic records. BMJ 342, 206 (2011).
23. Al-Ubaydli, M. A. & Smith, R. The BMA has adopted an old fashioned, paternalistic, and misguided policy by warning against patients having access to their electronic records. BMJ Rapid Response [online], http://www.bmj.com/ rapid-response/2011/11/03/bma-has-adopted-old-fashioned-paternalistic- andmisguided-policy-warning-a (2011).
24. The Academy of Medical Sciences. Personal data for public good: using health information in medical research. The Academy of Medical Sciences [online], www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p99puid62.html (2006).
25. Wellcome Trust. Public attitudes to research governance: a qualitative study in a deliberative context. Wellcome Trust [online], http://www.wellcome. ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy-communications/documents/ web-document/wtx038443.pdf (2007).
26. Medical Research Council. The use of personal health information in medical research. Medical Research Council [online], www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/ Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC003810 (2007).
27. Khong, S.-Y., Currie, I. & Eccles, S. NHS Connecting for Health and the National Programme for Information Technology. Obstetrician Gynaecol. 10, 27-32 (2008).
28. The Royal Academy of Engineering. Privacy and prejudice: young people's views on the development and use of electronic patient records. The Royal Academy of Engineering [online], http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/ reports/Privacy-and-Prejudice-EPR-views.pdf (2010).
29. Eriksson, N. et al. Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000993 (2010).