Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1255-1261

  Van Strien, Thisbe ^a   Van Der Linden Van Der Zwaag, Enrike ^a   Kaptein, Bart ^a   Van Erkel, Arjan ^a   Valstar, Edward ^a,b   Nelissen, Rob ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LEG; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; X RAY FILM;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349772441     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0642-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. JH Bargren JD Bhaha MAR Freeman 1983 Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations Clin Orthop Relat Res 83 173 178 183
2. H Bäthis L Perlick M Tingart C Lüring D Zurakowski J Grifka 2004 Alignment in total knee arthroplasty; a comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique J Bone and Joint Surg 86-B 682 687 10.1302/0301-620X.86B5.14927 (Pubitemid 39077216)
3. H Bäthis L Perlick M Tingart C Lüring C Perlick J Grifka 2004 Radiological results of CT-based and non-CT-based total knee arthroplasty Int Orthop 28 87 90 15224165 10.1007/s00264-003-0533-y (Pubitemid 38543980)
4. Z Bejek L Sólyom M Szendrõi 2007 Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty Int Orthop 31 617 622 17115156 10.1007/s00264-006-0254-0 (Pubitemid 47573373)
5. PL Chin KY Yang SJ Yeo NN Lo 2005 Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique J Arthroplasty 20 5 618 626 16309998 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.004 (Pubitemid 41073476)
6. R Decking Y Markmann J Fuchs P Wolfhart H Scharf 2005 Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation J Arthroplasty 20 3 282 288 15809943 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.047 (Pubitemid 40460792)
7. RG Haaker M Stockheim M Kamp G Proff J Breitenfelder A Ottersbach 2005 Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 443 152 159 10.1097/01.blo.0000150564. 31880.c4 (Pubitemid 40489263)
8. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott 1989 Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 13 14 2805470
9. I Ivarsson R Myrnerts 1986 The effect of the radiographic projection on the measured position of the prosthesis at knee arthroplasty Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105 350 352 3813848 10.1007/BF00449941 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7isleqsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 17065572)
10. RS Jeffery RW Morris RA Denham 1991 Coronal alignment after total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg 73-B 709 714
11. J Jenny C Boeri 2001 Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prosthesis: a CAOS control comparative study with classical instrumentation Computer Aided Surg 6 217 220 10.3109/10929080109146086 1:STN:280: DC%2BD387ivFyktg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34118302)
12. HJ Jung YB Jung KS Song SJ Park JS Lee 2007 Fractures associated with computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. A report of two cases J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 10 2280 2284 17908908 10.2106/JBJS.F.01166 (Pubitemid 47606178)
13. C Lüring H Bäthis M Tingart L Perlick J Grifka 2006 Computer assistance in total knee replacement: a critical assessment of current health care technology Computer Aided Surg 11 2 77 80 10.1080/10929080600578925 (Pubitemid 43932725)
14. BL Kaptein ER Valstar BC Stoel HC Reiber RG Nelissen 2007 Clinical validation of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis Clin Orthop Relat Res 464 205 209 18062052
15. JH Kellgren JS Lawrence 1957 Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis Ann Rheum Dis 16 4 485 493 13498603 10.1136/ard.16.4.485 1:STN:280: DyaG1c%2FktFeltA%3D%3D
16. CH Li TH Chen YP Su PC Shao KS Lee WM Chen 2008 Periprosthetic femoral supracondylar fracture after total knee arthroplasty with navigation system J Arthroplasty 23 2 304 307 18280429 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.049 (Pubitemid 351226490)
17. F Maculé-Beneyto D Hernández-Vaquero JM Segur-Vilalta R Colomina-Rodriguez P Hinarejos-Gomez I Garcia-Forcada B Seral Garcia 2006 Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study Int Orthop 30 536 540 16736149 10.1007/s00264-006-0126-7 (Pubitemid 44900565)
18. J Mahaluxmivala MJK Bankes P Nicolai CH Aldam PW Allen 2001 The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasties J Arthroplasty 16 5 635 640 11503124 10.1054/arth.2001.23569 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvlslSktw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32751451)
19. MHA Malik F Wadia ML Porter 2007 Preliminary radiological evaluation of the vector vision CT-free knee module for implantation of the LCS knee prosthesis The Knee 24 19 21 10.1016/j.knee.2006.10.001 (Pubitemid 46001592)
20. A Martin A von Strempel 2006 Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation in total knee arthroplasties Clin Orthop Relat Res 449 275 282 16672905
21. G Matziolis D Krocker U Weis S Tohtz C Perka 2007 A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 236 243 17272435 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386 (Pubitemid 46214339)
22. MA Ritter PM Faris EM Keating JB Meding 1994 Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival Clin Orthop Relat Res 299 153 156 8119010
23. L Ryd BEJ Albrektsson L Carlsson F Dansgård P Herberts A Lindstrand L Regnér S Toksvig-Larsen 1995 Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prosthesis J Bone Joint Surg 77-B 377 383
24. M Sparmann B Wolke H Czupalla D Banzer A Zink 2003 Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support J Bone Joint Surg 85-B 6 830 835 (Pubitemid 36986842)
25. M Tew W Waugh 1985 Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement J Bone and Joint Surg 67-B 4 551 556
26. ER Valstar RGHH Nelissen JHC Reiber PM Rozing 2002 The use of roentgen stereophotogrammetry to study micromotion of orthopaedic implants ISPRS J Photogramm 56 376 389 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00064-3 (Pubitemid 34923102)
27. ER Valstar FW de Jong HA Vrooman PM Rozing JH Reiber 2001 Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants J Biomech 34 6 715 722 11470108 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00028-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhslGnuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32674350)