Effect of preoperative deformity on postoperative leg axis in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1323-1327

  Hsu, Wei Hsiu ^a   Hsu, Robert Wen Wei ^a,b   Weng, Yi Jan ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NONE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Preoperative deformity; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956879463     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1146-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplast 20: 282-288.
2. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 9-12.
3. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433: 152-159.
4. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255: 215-227.
5. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192: 13-22.
6. Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22: 1248-1253.
7. Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T (2002) Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee 9: 275-279.
8. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13: 861-868.
9. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 236-243.
10. Rauh MA, Boyle J, Mihalko WM, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Krackow KA (2007) Reliability of measuring long-standing lower extremity radiographs. Orthopedics 30: 299-303.
11. Rosenberger RE, Fink C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Tecklenburg K, Hoser C (2008) The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16: 1133-1140.
12. Rosenberger RE, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C (2008) Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16: 249-257.
13. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 830-835.
14. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(A Suppl 2): 90-98.
15. Takasaki M, Matsuda S, Fukagawa S, Mitsuyasu H, Miura H, Iwamoto Y (2009) Accuracy of image-free navigation for severely deformed knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10. 1007/s00167-009-0944-4.
16. Teeny SM, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS, Jones M (1991) Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273: 19-31.
17. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 131-139.
18. Wang JW, Wang CJ (2002) Total knee arthroplasty for arthritis of the knee with extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 1769-1774.
19. Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH (2009) Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24: 668-673.
20. Zumstein MA, Frauchiger L, Wyss D, Hess R, Ballmer PM (2006) Is restricted femoral navigation sufficient for accuracy of total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 451: 80-86.