Combined influence of fermentation and drying conditions on survival and metabolic activity of starter and probiotic cultures after low-temperature vacuum drying

Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 159, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 351-357

  Bauer, S A W ^a   Schneider, S ^a   Behr, J ^a   Kulozik, U ^a   Foerst, P ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fermentation pH; Low temperature vacuum drying; Response surface methodology; Strain specific drying resistance

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL STRAINS; BIFIDOBACTERIUM LACTIS; CHAMBER PRESSURE; DRYING CONDITION; DRYING PROCESS; FERMENTATION CONDITIONS; FREEZE DRYING; HIGHLY STRAIN; LACTOBACILLUS DELBRUECKII; LOW TEMPERATURES; METABOLIC ACTIVITY; PROBIOTIC CULTURES; PROCESS CONDITION; RESIDUAL WATER CONTENT; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SURVIVAL RATE; VACUUM DRYING; VACUUM DRYING PROCESS;

BACILLI; FERMENTATION; METABOLISM; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; VACUUM;

DRYING;

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FREEZE DRYING; LACTOBACILLUS DELBRUECKII; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; LOW TEMPERATURE VACUUM DRYING; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SURVIVAL RATE; WATER CONTENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIFIDOBACTERIUM; COLD TEMPERATURE; DESICCATION; FERMENTATION; FREEZE DRYING; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTOBACILLUS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; VACUUM; WATER;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS; LACTOBACILLUS DELBRUECKII; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI;

EID: 84861233964     PISSN: 01681656     EISSN: 18734863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beney L., Mille Y., Gervais P. Death of Escherichia coli during rapid and severe dehydration is related to lipid phase transition. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65:457-467.
2. Bryant G., Koster K.L., Wolfe J. Membrane behavior in seeds and other systems at low water content: the various effects of solutes. Seed Sci. Res. 2001, 11:17-25.
3. Castro H.P., Teixeira P.M., Kirby R. Evidence of membrane damage in Lactobacillus bulgaricus following freeze drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 82:87-94.
4. Cox C.S. Roles of water molecules in bacteria and viruses. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1993, 23:29-36.
5. de Man J.C., Rogosa M., Sharpe M.E. A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1960, 23:130-135.
6. Fischer K. Neues Verfahren zur maßanalytischen Bestimmung des Wassergehaltes von Flüssigkeiten und festen Körpern. Angew. Chem. 1935, 48:394-396.
7. Gardiner G.E., O'Sullivan E., Kelly J., Auty M.A., Fitzgerald G.F., Collins J.K., Ross R.P., Stanton C. Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66:2605-2612.
8. Higl B., Santivarangkna C., Foerst P. Bewertung und Optimierung von Gefrier- und Vakuumtrocknungsverfahren in der Herstellung von mikrobiellen Starterkulturen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2008, 80:1157-1164.
9. Hoekstra F.A., Golovina E.A., Buitink J. Mechanism of plant desiccation tolerance. Trend Plant Sci. 2001, 6:431-438.
10. King V.A., Zall R.R., Ludington D.C. Controlled low-temperature vacuum dehydration-a new approach for low-temperature and low-pressure food drying. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54:1573-1579.
11. King V.A.E., Su J.T. Dehydration of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Process Biochem. 1993, 28:47-52.
12. Knorr D. Technology aspects related to microorganisms in functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 9:295-306.
13. Lievense L.C., Verbeek M.A.M., Vantriet K., Noomen A. Mechanism of dehydration inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 41:90-94.
14. Lorca G.L., De Valdez F. A low-pH-inducible, stationary phase acid tolerance response in Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 639. Curr. Microbiol. 2001, 42:21-25.
15. Meryman H.T., Williams R.J., Douglas M.S.J. Freezing injury from solution effects and its prevention by natural or artificial cryoprotection. Cryobiology 1977, 14:287-302.
16. Meryman H.T. Cryopreservation of living cells: principles and practice. Transfusion (Paris) 2007, 47:935-945.
17. Regier M., Knörzer K., Erle U. Mikrowellen- und Mikrowellen-Vakuumtrocknung von Lebensmitteln. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2004, 76:424-431.
18. Santivarangkna C., Wenning M., Foerst P., Kulozik U. Damage of cell envelope of Lactobacillus helveticus during vacuum drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102:748-756.
19. Silva J., Carvalho A.S., Pereira H., Teixeira P., Gibbs P.A. Induction of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus by the addition of sucrose to the growth medium. J. Dairy Res. 2004, 71:121-125.
20. Silva J., Carvalho A.S., Ferreira R., Vitorino R., Amado F., Domingues P., Teixeira P., Gibbs P.A. Effect of the pH of growth on the survival of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus to stress conditions during spray-drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98:775-782.
21. Teixeira P., Castro H., Mohacsi-Farkas C., Kirby R. Identification of sites of injury in Lactobacillus bulgaricus during heat stress. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 83:219-226.
22. Ulmer H.M., Herberhold H., Fahsel S., Gänzle M.G., Winter R., Vogel R.F. Effects of pressure-induced membrane phase transitions on inactivation of HorA, an ATP-dependent multidrug resistance transporter, in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:1088-1095.
23. Valdramidis V.P., Geeraerd A.H., Gaze J.E., Kondjoyan A., Boyd A.R., Shaw H.L., van Impe J.F. Quantitative description of Listeria monocytogenes inactivation kinetics with temperature and water activity as the influencing factors; model prediction and methodological validation on dynamic data. J. Food Eng. 2005, 76:79-88.
24. Wang Y., Corrieu G., Béal C. Fermentation pH and temperature influence the cyrotolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus RD758. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:21-29.