Interpersonal perception, personality, and academic achievement: A dyadic approach for the study of undergraduate performance;Percepción interpersonal, personalidad y rendimiento académico: Un enfoque diádico para el estudio del rendimiento de los estudiantes universitarios

Anales de Psicologia

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 97-106

  Andrés, Amara ^a   Solanas, Antonio ^a,b   Salafranca, Lluís ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior (IR3C)   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Dyadic analysis; NEO FFI; Project groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860893470     PISSN: 02129728     EISSN: 16952294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrés, A., Salafranca, Ll., & Solanas, A. (2008, July). Social reciprocity and group performance. Poster session presented at the III European Congress of Methodology, Oviedo, Spain.
2. Ayán, M., García, M., & Howard, V. (2008). Prediction of university stu-dents' academic achievement by linear and logistic models. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 275-288.
3. Armitage, C. J. (2008). Cognitive and effective predictors of academic achievement in schoolchildren. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 57-74.
4. Arthur, W., Jr., Bell, S. T., & Edwards, B. D. (2007). A longitudinal examina-tion of the comparative criterion-related validity of additive and refer-ent-shift consensus operationalizations of team efficacy. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 35-58.
5. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relat-ing member ability and personality to work-team processes and team ef-fectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
6. Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595-615.
7. Bernardo, A. B., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Rosário, P., Alvarez, L., González-Castro, P., et al. (2009). Intellectual styles and academic achievement: A developmental perspective. Psicothema, 21, 555-561.
8. Biemann, T., & Kearney, E. (2009). Size does matter: How varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6.
9. Bolin, A. U., & Neuman, G. A. (2006). Personality, process, and perform-ance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business & Psychology, 20, 565-585.
10. Cano-García, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achieve-ment. Educational Psychology, 20, 413-430.
11. Cook, W. L. (2005). The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduc-tion and case example. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 216-225.
12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McRae, R. R. (2002). Manual NEO PI-R. Madrid: Tea Ediciones.
13. Diseth, Ǻ. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143-155.
14. Early, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transactional team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
15. Elfenbein, H. A., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (2007). Fitting in: The effects of rela-tional demography and person-culture fit on group process and per-formance. Group & Organization Management, 32, 109-142.
16. Greguras, G. J., Robie, C., & Born, M. P. (2001) Applying the social rela-tions model to self and peer evaluations. Journal of Management Develop-ment, 20, 508-524
17. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312.
18. Harris, D. (1940). Factors affecting college grades: A review of the literature, 1930-1937. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 125-166.
19. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity con-structs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
20. Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An in-tegrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36, 83-105.
21. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015.
22. Hough, L. M. (1992). The 'big five' personality variables-construct confu-sion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-154.
23. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J.A., & Peyron-nin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimi-larity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
24. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Defining dimensions of dis-tinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1481-1492.
25. Kennett, D.J., & Keefer, K. (2006). Impact of learned resourcefulness and theories of intelligence on academic achievement of university students: An integrated approach. Educational Psychology, 26, 441-457.
26. Kennett, D. J., & Reed, M. J (2009). Factors influencing academic success and retention following a 1st-year post-secondary success course, Edu-cational Research and Evaluation, 15,153-166.
27. Kennett, D.J., & Van Gulick, C. (2001). Dealing with academic success and failure: The association between learned resourcefulness, explanatory style, reported grades and sharing experiences with academic self-control. In D.J. Kennett & A.M. Young (Eds.), Notes on applied statistical methods in psychol-ogy integrating STATISTICA software (pp.325-354). Peterborough, Canada: Trent University Press.
28. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. A social relations analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
29. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 83, 126-137.
30. Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from ele-mentary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441-451.
31. Mas-Tous, C., & Medinas-Amorós, M. (2007). Motivaciones para el estudio en universitarios. Anales de Psicología, 23, 17-24.
32. Mohammed, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Bartlett, A. L. (2002). Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and con-textual performance: Considering the influence of team-and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 795-814.
33. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relation-ship between work-team personality composition and the job perform-ance of teams. Group Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
34. O'Reilly, C. A., III, Cadwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 34, 21-37.
35. Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377-396.
36. Roberson, Q. M., Sturman, M. C., & Simons, T. L. (2007). Does the meas-ure of dispersion matter in multilevel research? A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes. Organizational Research Meth-ods, 10, 564-588.
37. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdepend-ence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
38. Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1975). Group processes in the classroom. (2nd ed). Oxford England: Wm. C. Brown.
39. Seber, G. A. F., & Wild, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear regression. New York: John Willey & Sons.
40. Sierra, V., Andrés, A., Solanas, A., & Leiva, D. (in press). Agreement in in-terpersonal perceptions as a predictor of group performance. Psicothema.
41. Solanas, A., Salafranca, Ll., Riba, C., Sierra, V., & Leiva, D. (2006). Quantify-ing social asymmetric structures. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 390-399.
42. Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-55.
43. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
44. Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44-67.
45. Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expres-sion, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait acti-vation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397-423.
46. Tett, R. P., & Murphy, P. J. (2002). Personality and situations in coworker preference: Similarity and complementary in worker compatibility. Jour-nal of Business and Psychology, 17, 223-241.
47. Torenbeeka, M., Jansen, E. & Hofman, A. (2010). The effect of the fit be-tween secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 659-675.
48. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1992). Being different: Rela-tional demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
49. Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic ef-fects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
50. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administra-tive Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
51. Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Acquaintance reports of personal-ity and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 221-229.