The statistical analysis of data from small groups

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 126-137

  Kenny, David A ^b   Mannetti, Lucia ^a   Pierro, Antonio ^a   Livi, Stefano ^a   Kashy, Deborah A ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 85047670009     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.126     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, L. R., & Ager, J. W. (1978). Analysis of variance in small group research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 341-345.
2. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Boyd, L., & Iversen, G. (1979). Contextual analysis: Concepts and statistical techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2001). Attachment orientations, dependence, and behavior in a stressful situation: An application of the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 849-871.
7. Crits-Christoph, P., & Mintz, J. (1990). Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 20-26.
8. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.
9. Firebaugh, G. (1978). A rule for inferring individual-level relationships from aggregate data. American Sociological Review, 43, 557-572.
10. Fletcher, G. J. O., & Fitness, J. (1990). Occurrent social cognition in close relationship interaction: The role of proximal and distal variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 464-474.
11. Glick, W. (1980). Problems in cross-level inference. In K. H. Roberts & L. Burstein (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science (pp. 17-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Glick, W. H., & Roberts, K. H. (1984). Hypothesized interdependence, assumed independence. Academy of Management Review, 9, 722-735.
13. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309-328.
14. Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data: Models for the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-439.
15. Haney, W. (1980). Units and levels of analysis in large-scale evaluation. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 6, 1-15.
16. Hoyle, R. H., Georgesen, J. C., & Webster, J. M. (2001). Analyzing data from individuals in groups: The past, the present, and the future. Group Dynamics, 5, 41-47.
17. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kashy, D. A., & Snyder, D. K. (1995). Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research. Psychological Assessment, 7, 338-348.
19. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of nonindependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
21. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustration. Journal of Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
22. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
23. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
25. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
26. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
27. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfingen, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
28. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105.
29. Myers, J. L. (1979). Fundamentals of experimental design (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
31. Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2000). [IPA and SYMLOG observations of group members]. Unpublished raw data, University of Rome, Sapienza.
32. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2001). HLM5: Hierararchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
33. Satterthwaite, F. W. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-140.
34. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355.
35. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
36. Snijders, T. A. B., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 471-486.
37. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
38. Wassermann, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.