The SUMO pathway in mitosis

SUMO Regulation of Cellular Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 153-169

  Mukhopadhyay, Debaditya ^a   Dasso, Mary ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Condensin; Kinetochore; Mitosis; SUMO; Topoisomerase

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860779452     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2649-1_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Andrews, P. D., Ovechkina, Y., Morrice, N., Wagenbach, M., Duncan, K., Wordeman, L. and Swedlow, J. R., 2004, Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell 6, 253-268.
2. Arnaoutov, A., Azuma, Y., Ribbeck, K., Joseph, J., Boyarchuk, Y., Karpova, T., McNally, J. and Dasso, M., 2005, Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 626-632.
3. Ayaydin, F. and Dasso, M., 2004, Distinct in vivo dynamics of vertebrate SUMO paralogues. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5208-5218.
4. Azuma, Y., Arnaoutov, A., Anan, T. and Dasso, M., 2005, PIASy mediates SUMO-2 conjugation of Topoisomerase-II on mitotic chromosomes. EMBO J. 24, 2172-2782.
5. Azuma, Y., Arnaoutov, A. and Dasso, M., 2003, SUMO-2/3 regulates topoisomerase II in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 163, 477-487.
6. Baba, D., Maita, N., Jee, J., Uchimura, Y., Saitoh, H., Sugasawa, K., Hanaoka, F., Tochio, H., Hiroaki, H. and Shirakawa, M., 2005, Crystal structure of thymine DNA glycosylase conjugated to SUMO-1. Nature 435, 979-982.
7. Bachant, J., Alcasabas, A., Blat, Y., Kleckner, N. and Elledge, S. J., 2002, The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol. Cell 9, 1169-1182.
8. Bachellier-Bassi, S., Gadal, O., Bourout, G. and Nehrbass, U., 2008, Cell cycle-dependent kinetochore localization of condensin complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Struct. Biol. 162, 248-259.
9. Beliakoff, J. and Sun, Z., 2006, Zimp7 and Zimp10, two novel PIAS-like proteins, function as androgen receptor coregulators. Nucl. Recept. Signal. 4, e017.
10. Belmont, A. S., 2006, Mitotic chromosome structure and condensation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 632-638.
11. Bharadwaj, R., Qi, W. and Yu, H., 2004, Identification of two novel components of the human NDC80 kinetochore complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 13076-13085.
12. Bylebyl, G. R., Belichenko, I. and Johnson, E. S., 2003, The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 44113-44120.
13. Cheeseman, I. M. and Desai, A., 2008, Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 33-46.
14. Cheng, C., Lo, Y., Liang, S., Ti, S., Lin, F., Yeh, C., Huang, H. and Wang, T., 2006, SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20, 2067-2081.
15. Chung, T. L., Hsiao, H. H., Yeh, Y. Y., Shia, H. L., Chen, Y. L., Liang, P. H., Wang, A. H., Khoo, K. H., and Shoei-Lung Li, S. (2004). In vitro modification of human centromere protein CENPC fragments by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) protein: definitive identification of the modification sites by tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the isopeptides. J Biol Chem 279, 39653-39662.
16. Cleveland, D. W., Mao, Y. and Sullivan, K. F., 2003, Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112, 407-421.
17. Cooke, C. A., Schaar, B., Yen, T. J. and Earnshaw, W. C., 1997, Localization of CENP-E in the fibrous corona and outer plate of mammalian kinetochores from prometaphase through anaphase. Chromosoma 106, 446-455.
18. D'Amours, D., Stegmeier, F. and Amon, A., 2004, Cdc14 and condensin control the dissolution of cohesin-independent chromosome linkages at repeated DNA. Cell 117, 455-469.
19. Dasso, M., 2002, The Ran GTPase: theme and variations. Curr. Biol. 12, R502-R508.
20. Dasso, M., 2006, Ran at kinetochores. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 711-715.
21. Dasso, M., 2008, Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in mitosis. Cell Div. 3, 5.
22. Dawlaty, M. M., Malureanu, L., Jeganathan, K. B., Kao, E., Sustmann, C., Tahk, S., Shuai, K., Grosschedl, R. and van Deursen, J. M., 2008, Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell 133, 103-115.
23. Denison, C., Rudner, A. D., Gerber, S. A., Bakalarski, C. E., Moazed, D. and Gygi, S. P., 2005, A proteomic strategy for gaining insights into protein sumoylation in yeast. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 246-254.
24. Denison, S. H., Käfer, E. and May, G. S., 1993, Mutation in the bimD gene of Aspergillus nidulans confers a conditional mitotic block and sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. Genetics 134, 1085-1096.
25. Devoy, A., Soane, T., Welchman, R. and Mayer, R. J., 2005, The ubiquitin-proteasome system and cancer. Essays Biochem. 41, 187-203.
26. Díaz-Martínez, L. A., Giménez-Abián, J. F., Azuma, Y., Guacci, V., Giménez-Martín, G., Lanier, L. M. and Clarke, D. J., 2006, PIASgamma is required for faithful chromosome segregation in human cells. PLoS ONE 1, e53.
27. Fukagawa, T., Regnier, V. and Ikemura, T., 2001, Creation and characterization of temperaturesensitive CENP-C mutants in vertebrate cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3796-3803.
28. Geiss-Friedlander, R. andMelchior, F., 2007, Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 947-956.
29. Glotzer, M., 2005, The molecular requirements for cytokinesis. Science 307, 1735-1739.
30. Haering, C. H. and Nasmyth, K., 2003, Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids. Bioessays 25, 1178-1191.
31. Hannich, J. T., Lewis, A., Kroetz, M. B., Li, S., Heide, H., Emili, A. and Hochstrasser, M., 2005, Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4102-4110.
32. Hauf, S., Roitinger, E., Koch, B., Dittrich, C. M., Mechtler, K. and Peters, J., 2005, Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 3, e69.
33. Hecker, C., Rabiller, M., Haglund, K., Bayer, P. and Dikic, I., 2006, Specification of SUMO1-and SUMO2-interacting motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16117-16127.
34. Hirano, T., 2005, Condensins: organizing and segregating the genome. Curr. Biol. 15, R265-R275.
35. Hirano, T., 2006, At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 311-322.
36. Jeong, S. Y., Rose, A., Joseph, J., Dasso, M. and Meier, I., 2005, Plant-specific mitotic targeting of RanGAP requires a functional WPP domain. Plant J. 42, 270-282.
37. Johnson, E. S., 2004, Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 355-382.
38. Johnson, E. S. and Blobel, G., 1999, Cell cycle-regulated attachment of the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO to the yeast septins. J. Cell Biol. 147, 981-994.
39. Joseph, J., Liu, S., Jablonski, S. A., Yen, T. J. and Dasso, M., 2004, The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr. Biol. 14, 611-617.
40. Joseph, J., Tan, S., Karpova, T. S., McNally, J. G. and Dasso,M., 2002, SUMO-1 targets RanGAP1 to kinetochores and mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol. 156, 595-602.
41. Kagey, M. H., Melhuish, T. A. and Wotton, D., 2003, The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell 113, 127-137.
42. Kapoor, T. M., Lampson, M. A., Hergert, P., Cameron, L., Cimini, D., Salmon, E. D., McEwen, B. F. and Khodjakov, A., 2006, Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388-391.
43. Keaton, M. A. and Lew, D. J., 2006, Eavesdropping on the cytoskeleton: progress and controversy in the yeast morphogenesis checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9, 540-546.
44. Kim, Y., Heuser, J. E., Waterman, C. M. and Cleveland, D. W., 2008, CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol. 181, 411-419.
45. Klein, U. R., Haindl, M., Nigg, E. A. and Muller, S., 2009, RanBP2 and SENP3 Function in a Mitotic SUMO2/3 Conjugation-Deconjugation Cycle on Borealin. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 410-418.
46. Kwon, M., Hori, T., Okada, M. and Fukagawa, T., 2007, CENP-C is involved in chromosome segregation, mitotic checkpoint function, and kinetochore assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2155-2168.
47. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V., Jeanne, M., Benhenda, S., Nasr, R., Lei, M., Peres, L., Zhou, J., Zhu, J., Raught, B. and de Thé, H., 2008, Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 547-555.
48. Lan, W., Zhang, X., Kline-Smith, S. L., Rosasco, S. E., Barrett-Wilt, G. A., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., Walczak, C. E. and Stukenberg, P. T., 2004, Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr. Biol. 14, 273-286.
49. Lee, J., Kitajima, T. S., Tanno, Y., Yoshida, K., Morita, T., Miyano, T., Miyake, M. and Watanabe, Y., 2008, Unified mode of centromeric protection by shugoshin in mammalian oocytes and somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 42-52.
50. Lin, D., Huang, Y., Jeng, J., Kuo, H., Chang, C., Chao, T., Ho, C., Chen, Y., Lin, T., Fang, H., Hung, C., Suen, C., Hwang, M., Chang, K.,Maul, G. G. and Shih, H., 2006, Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Mol. Cell 24, 341-354.
51. Mahajan, R., Gerace, L. and Melchior, F., 1998, Molecular characterization of the SUMO-1 modification of RanGAP1 and its role in nuclear envelope association. J. Cell Biol. 140, 259-270.
52. Makhnevych, T., Ptak, C., Lusk, C. P., Aitchison, J. D. and Wozniak, R. W., 2007, The role of karyopherins in the regulated sumoylation of septins. J. Cell Biol. 177, 39-49.
53. Martin, S. W. and Konopka, J. B., 2004, SUMO modification of septin-interacting proteins in Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40861-40867.
54. Matsumoto, T. and Yanagida, M., 2005, The dream of every chromosome: equal segregation for a healthy life of the host. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 570, 281-310.
55. Matunis, M. J.,Wu, J. and Blobel, G., 1998, SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140, 499-509.
56. McAinsh, A. D., Tytell, J. D. and Sorger, P. K., 2003, Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 519-539.
57. McEwen, B. F., Chan, G. K., Zubrowski, B., Savoian, M. S., Sauer, M. T. and Yen, T. J., 2001, CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12, 2776-2789.
58. Meluh, P. B. and Koshland, D., 1995, Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 793-807.
59. Meulmeester, E., Kunze, M., Hsiao, H. H., Urlaub, H. and Melchior, F., 2008, Mechanism and consequences for paralog-specific sumoylation of ubiquitin-specific protease 25. Mol. Cell 30, 610-619.
60. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R. and Nasmyth, K., 1997, Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35-45.
61. Minty, A., Dumont, X., Kaghad, M. and Caput, D., 2000, Covalent modification of p73alpha by SUMO-1. Two-hybrid screening with p73 identifies novel SUMO-1-interacting proteins and a SUMO-1 interaction motif. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36316-36323.
62. Montpetit, B., Hazbun, T. R., Fields, S. and Hieter, P., 2006, Sumoylation of the budding yeast kinetochore protein Ndc10 is required for Ndc10 spindle localization and regulation of anaphase spindle elongation. J. Cell Biol. 174, 653-663.
63. Mukhopadhyay, D., Ayaydin, F., Kolli, N., Tan, S., Anan, T., Kametaka, A., Azuma, Y.,Wilkinson, K. D. and Dasso, M., 2006, SUSP1 antagonizes formation of highly SUMO2/3-conjugated species. J. Cell Biol. 174, 939-949.
64. Mukhopadhyay, D. and Dasso, M., 2007, Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 286-295.
65. Musacchio, A. and Salmon, E. D., 2007, The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393.
66. Palvimo, J. J., 2007, PIAS proteins as regulators of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) modifications and transcription. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 1405-1408.
67. Panse, V. G., Hardeland, U., Werner, T., Kuster, B. and Hurt, E., 2004, A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 41346-41351.
68. Pichler, A., Gast, A., Seeler, J. S., Dejean, A. and Melchior, F., 2002, The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108, 109-120.
69. Potts, P. R. and Yu, H., 2005, Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7021-7032.
70. Putkey, F. R., Cramer, T., Morphew, M. K., Silk, A. D., Johnson, R. S., McIntosh, J. R. and Cleveland, D. W., 2002, Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev. Cell 3, 351-365.
71. Reverter, D. and Lima, C. D., 2005, Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMORanGAP1-Ubc9-Nup358 complex. Nature 435, 687-692.
72. Ruchaud, S., Carmena, M. and Earnshaw, W. C., 2007, Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 798-812.
73. Saitoh, H., Pu, R., Cavenagh, M. and Dasso, M., 1997, RanBP2 associates with Ubc9p and a modified form of RanGAP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3736-3741.
74. Saitoh, H., Sparrow, D. B., Shiomi, T., Pu, R. T., Nishimoto, T., Mohun, T. J. and Dasso, M., 1998, Ubc9p and the conjugation of SUMO-1 to RanGAP1 and RanBP2. Curr. Biol. 8, 121-124.
75. Sandall, S., Severin, F.,McLeod, I. X., Yates, J. R., Oegema, K., Hyman, A. and Desai, A., 2006, A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 127, 1179-1191.
76. Shamu, C. E. and Murray, A. W., 1992, Sister chromatid separation in frog egg extracts requires DNA topoisomerase II activity during anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 117, 921-934.
77. Shen, T. H., Lin, H., Scaglioni, P. P., Yung, T. M. and Pandolfi, P. P., 2006, The mechanisms of PML-nuclear body formation. Mol. Cell 24, 331-339.
78. Shih, H., Hales, K. G., Pringle, J. R. and Peifer, M., 2002, Identification of septin-interacting proteins and characterization of the Smt3/SUMO-conjugation system in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 115, 1259-1271.
79. Song, J., Zhang, Z., Hu, W. and Chen, Y., 2005, Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) recognition of a SUMO binding motif: a reversal of the bound orientation. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 40122-40129.
80. Stead, K., Aguilar, C., Hartman, T., Drexel, M., Meluh, P. and Guacci, V., 2003, Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J. Cell Biol. 163, 729-741.
81. Strunnikov, A. V., Aravind, L. and Koonin, E. V., 2001, Saccharomyces cerevisiae SMT4 encodes an evolutionarily conserved protease with a role in chromosome condensation regulation. Genetics 158, 95-107.
82. Takahashi, Y., Dulev, S., Liu, X., Hiller, N. J., Zhao, X. and Strunnikov, A., 2008, Cooperation of sumoylated chromosomal proteins in rDNA maintenance. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000215.
83. Takahashi, Y. and Strunnikov, A., 2008, In vivo modeling of polysumoylation uncovers targeting of Topoisomerase II to the nucleolus via optimal level of SUMO modification. Chromosoma 117, 189-198.
84. Takahashi, Y., Yong-Gonzalez, V., Kikuchi, Y. and Strunnikov, A., 2006, SIZ1/SIZ2 control of chromosome transmission fidelity is mediated by the sumoylation of topoisomerase II. Genetics 172, 783-794.
85. Tatham, M. H., Geoffroy, M., Shen, L., Plechanovova, A., Hattersley, N., Jaffray, E. G., Palvimo, J. J. and Hay, R. T., 2008, RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 538-546.
86. Versele, M. and Thorner, J., 2005, Some assembly required: yeast septins provide the instruction manual. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 414-424.
87. Wang, X. and Dai, W., 2005, Shugoshin, a guardian for sister chromatid segregation. Exp. Cell Res. 310, 1-9.
88. Wei, R. R., Sorger, P. K. and Harrison, S. C., 2005, Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 5363-5367.
89. Wohlschlegel, J. A., Johnson, E. S., Reed, S. I. and Yates, J. R., 2004, Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45662-45668.
90. Wong, K. A., Kim, R., Christofk, H., Gao, J., Lawson, G. and Wu, H., 2004, Protein inhibitor of activated STAT Y (PIASy) and a splice variant lacking exon 6 enhance sumoylation but are not essential for embryogenesis and adult life. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5577-5586.
91. Wykoff, D. D. and O-Shea, E. K., 2005, Identification of sumoylated proteins by systematic immunoprecipitation of the budding yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 73-83.
92. Xie, Y., Kerscher, O., Kroetz, M. B., McConchie, H. F., Sung, P. and Hochstrasser, M., 2007, The yeast Hex3. Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34176-34184.
93. Yen, T. J., Compton, D. A., Wise, D., Zinkowski, R. P., Brinkley, B. R., Earnshaw, W. C. and Cleveland, D. W., 1991, CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 10, 1245-1254.
94. Zhang, X., Goeres, J., Zhang, H., Yen, T. J., Porter, A. C. G. and Matunis, M. J., 2008, SUMO-2/3 modification and binding regulate the association of CENP-E with kinetochores and progression through mitosis. Mol. Cell 29, 729-741.
95. Zhou, W., Ryan, J. J. and Zhou, H., 2004, Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 32262-32268.
96. Zhu, J., Zhu, S., Guzzo, C. M., Ellis, N. A., Sung, K. S., Choi, C. Y. and Matunis, M. J., 2008, Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) binding determines substrate recognition and paralog-selective SUMO modification. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 29405-29415.