Moving towards maturity: Challenges to successful e-government implementation and diffusion

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 11-22

  Dwivedi, Yogesh K ^a   Weerakkody, Vishanth ^b   Janssen, Marijn ^c  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adoption and diffusion; E government; Implementation; Information systems; Theory; Transformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860560793     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2096140.2096142     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Accenture (2004). E-government leadership: high performance, maximum value. Retrieved June 2007, from http://www.accenture.com/NR/rdonlyres/D72061 99-C3D4-4CB4-A7D8- 846C94287890/0/gove-egov-value.pdf.
2. Al-Shafi, S. (2008). Free Wireless Internet park Services: An Investigation of Technology Adoption in Qatar from a Citizens' Perspective. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 10, 21-34.
3. AlTameem, T., Zairi, M., and Alshawi, S. (2006). Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation. Innovations in Information Technology, 1-5.
4. Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18, 109-132. (Pubitemid 38803900)
5. Beynon-Davies, P., and Williams, M. D. (2004) Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. Journal of Information Technology, 18, 137-149. (Pubitemid 37147633)
6. Bharosa, N., Feenstra, R., Gortmaker, J., Klievink, B., and Janssen, M. (2008). Rethinking Serviceoriented Government: is it really about services? In: H. Bouwman, R. Bons, M. Hoogeweegen, M. Janssen, and H. Pronk et al. (eds.). Let A thousand Flowers Bloom. Essays in commemoration of Prof.dr. René Wagenaar, IOS Press.
7. Committee on Governmental Affairs, (2001). EGovernment Act. Retrieved May 2007 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
9. DeLone W.H., and McLean E..R (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
10. DeLone W.H., and McLean E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
11. Dwivedi Y.K., and Irani, Z. (2009). Understanding the Adopters and Non-adopters of Broadband, Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 122-125.
12. Dwivedi Y.K., Lal, B., and Williams, M.D. (2009). Managing Consumer Adoption of Broadband: Examining Drivers and Barriers, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109 (3), 357-369.
13. Dwivedi Y.K., and Williams, M.D. (2008). The Influence of Demographic Variables on Citizens' Adoption of E-Government. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 5(3), 261-274.
14. Dwivedi Y.K., Choudrie J., and Brinkman, W.P. (2006). Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(5), 700-718. (Pubitemid 43672848)
15. Ebrahim, Z., and Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11, 589-611. (Pubitemid 41374242)
16. Fang, Z. (2006) E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, 10, 1-22.
17. Gupta, M. P., and Jana, D. (2003). E-government Evaluation: A Framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365-387. (Pubitemid 37527835)
18. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. A. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business Books, New York, 1993. ISBN 0-06-662112-7.
19. Hazlett, S., and Hill, F. (2003). E-government: the realities of using IT to transform the public sector, Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 445-452. (Pubitemid 38002649)
20. Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing government in the information age: International practice in ITenabled public sector reform, Routledge.
21. Heeks, R. (2006). Impact assessment of ICT4D projects: a partial review of frameworks. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management.
22. Hu, Q., Hart, P., and Cooke, D. (2006). The Role of External Influences on Organizational Information Security Practices: An Institutional Perspective. System Sciences, 2006. HICSS '06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
23. Irani, Z., Dwivedi, YK, and Williams, M.D. (2009). Understanding Consumer Adoption of Broadband: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model, Journal of Operational Research Society, 60(10), 1322-1334.
24. Irani, Z., Elliman, T., and Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: a research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 327-335.
25. Irani, Z., Love, P. E. D., and Jones, S. (2008). Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 155-164.
26. Jaeger, P. T., and Thompson, K. M. (2003). Egovernment around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 389-394. (Pubitemid 37527836)
27. Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: egovernment as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323-331. (Pubitemid 37527832)
28. Janssen, M., and Cresswell, A. (2005). An Enterprise Application Integration Methodology for E-Government. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 531-547. (Pubitemid 41374252)
29. Janssen, M., Kuk, G., and Wagenaar, R. W. (2008). A Survey of Web-based Business Models for e- Government in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 202-220.
30. Jørgensen, T. B., and B. Bozeman (2007). Public Values: An Inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381
31. Kamal, M. M., Themistocleous, M., and Morabito, V. (2009.) Justifying the Decisions for EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Validated Proposition of Factors, Adoption Lifecycle Phases, Mapping and Prioritisation of Factors.
32. Kawalek, P., and Wastall, D. (2005). Pursuing radical transformation in information age government: case studies using the SPRINT methodology. Journal of Global Information Management, 13, 79-101.
33. Ke, W., and Wei, K. K. (2004). Successful egovernment in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 47, 95-99.
34. Kunstelj, M., and Vintar, M (2004). Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis. Information Polity table of contents archive Volume 9 Issue 3,4, December 2004 Pages 131-148
35. Kunstelj, M., and Vintar, M. (2004). Evaluating the Progress of e-Government. Information Polity, 9(3-4), 131-148.
36. Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., and Pernul, G. (2003) Security requirements for egovernment services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer Communications, 26, 1873-1883.
37. Layne, K., and Lee, J. (2001) Developing Fully Functional E-government: A four-stage model. Government information quarterly, 18(2), 122-136. (Pubitemid 33379949)
38. Lee, J. K., and Rao, H. R. (2003). Risk of Terrorism, Trust in Government, and e-Government Services: An Exploratory Study of Citizens' Intention to use e-Government Services in a Turbulent Environment.
39. Macintosh, A. (2004) Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. IEEE Computer Society, 1-10.
40. Mansar, L. S. (2006) 'E-Government Implementation: A comparative evaluation of websites maturity', Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), 6-7 July, 2006, Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.
41. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public administration review, 424-433.
42. Mosse, B., and Whitley, E. A. (2009). Critically classifying: UK e-government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customers. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 149-173.
43. NECCC (2000) E-Government Strategic Planning, National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council. Las Vegas, NV.
44. O'Donnell, O., O'Donnell & Peter, T. V. O., Humphreys, C. & Humphreys, P. C. (2003) EGovernment and the Decentralisation of Service Delivery: CPMR Discussion Paper 25, Institute of Public Administration.
45. Orlikowski, J.W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
46. Reffat, R. (2003). Developing A Successful EGovernment. School Of Architecture, Design Science And Planning. University Of Sydney, Australia.
47. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
48. Saebo, O., Rose, J., and Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008) The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 400-428.
49. Shareef, M.A., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2011). E-government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing Service Maturity Levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17-35.
50. Shareef, M.A., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2009) Identifying Critical Factors for Adoption of E-Government, Electronic Government: An International Journal, 6(1), 70-96.
51. Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government? Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government, Parliamentary Affairs, 54, 88-101.
52. Tan, C.W., and Pan, S.L. (2003). Managing etransformation in the public sector: an egovernment study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore, European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269-281. (Pubitemid 38284795)
53. Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., and Seah, K.L. (2000). Business process reengineering in the public sector: the case of the housing development board in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 245-270. (Pubitemid 32716770)
54. Titah, R. & Barki, H. (2006). E-government adoption and acceptance: a literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2, 23-57.
55. Tung, L. L., and Rieck, O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. Journal of strategic information systems, 14, 417-440. (Pubitemid 41525800)
56. UNDPEPA (2002) Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective, Assessing the Progress of the UN Member States.
57. United Nations and American Society Public Administration (UN/ASPA) (2001) Global Survey Of E-Government. Retrieved November 27, 2007, rrom http://www.unpan.org/egovernment2.asp.accessed.
58. UNPAN. (2002). Benchmarking e-Government - A Global Perspective. New York, NY: United Nations.
59. UNPAN. (2008). UN e-government survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance. New York, NY: United Nations.
60. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
61. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., and Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of egovernment by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12, 157-162.
62. Weerakkody, V., and Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from E-Government to T-Government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4, 1-16.
63. Weerakkody, V., Jones, S., and Olsen, E. (2007). EGovernment: A Comparison of Strategies in Local Authorities in the UK and Norway, International Journal of Electronic Business,5 (2), pp 141-159.
64. Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2011).Transformational Change and Business Process Reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320-328.
65. Williams, M.D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B., and Schwarz, A. (2009). Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 1-10.
66. West, D.M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp 15-27. (Pubitemid 38059187)