E-government implementation: A comparative evaluation of websites maturity

Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, EMCIS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Mansar, Selma Limam ^a  

^a ZAYED UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Barriers; Business process management; E government; Lessons learnt

Indexed keywords

BARRIERS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS INTEGRATION; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; E-GOVERNMENT; E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS; INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURES; LESSONS LEARNT; USER INVOLVEMENT;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; WEBSITES;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84857536345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bakry S.H. 2004, Development of e-government: a STOPE view.. International Journal of Network Management, 14:339-350.
2. Chao Y and Tong F. 2005, The problems in the implementation of e-government administration, the analysis and strategies.. ICEC.05, August 15-17, 2005, Xi.an, China. Copyright 20005 ACM1- 59593-112-0/05/08.
3. Choudrie J, Weerakoddy V and Jones S. 2005, Realising e-government in the UK: Rural and Urban challenges.. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5): 568-585.
4. eEurope. 2002, eEurope 2002 Action Plan.. http://europa.eu.int/ information-society/eeurope/2002/action-plan/index-en.htm, 16. 8. 2002.
5. Hu Y, Xiao J, Pang J and Xie K. 2005, A Research on the Appraisal Framework of e-Government Project Success.. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on electronic commerce, ICEC.05. ACM Press.
6. Folstad A, Jorgensen H and Krogstie J. 2004, User involvement in e-Government development Projects.. Communications of the ACM.
7. Irani Z, Love P.E.D, Elliman T, Jones S and Marinos T. 2005, Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities.. Information Systems Journal, 15: 61-82.
8. Janssen M, Kuk G and Wagenaar R.W. 2005, A Survey of e-Government Business Models in the Netherlands.. ICEC.05, August 15-17, 2005, Xi.an, China. Copyright 20005 ACM1-59593-112- 0/05/08.
9. Li B. 2005, On the barriers to the development of e-Government in China.. ICEC.05, August 15-17, Xi.an, China. Copyright 20005 ACM1-59593-112-0/05/08.
10. Limam Mansar S and Reijers H.A. 2005, Best practices in Business Process Redesign: Validation of a redesign framework.. Computers in Industry, 56(5): 457-471.
11. Limam Mansar S and Reijers H.A. 2007, Best practices in business process redesign: Use and Impact.. Business Process Management Journal. To appear in issue 2.
12. Limam Mansar S and Reijers H.A. 2006, BPR Implementation: a Decision.Making Strategy.. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3812: 421 - 431. Berlin, Springer Verlag publisher.
13. Melitski J, Holzer M, Seang-Tae K, Kim C and Rho S. 2005, Digital Government Worldwide: An e- Government Assessment of Municipal Web Sites.. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1):1-19.
14. Peters R.M, Janssen M and Engers T.M.v. 2004, Measuring e-Government Impact: Existing practices and shortcomings.. ICEC.04, Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce. Copyright 2004, ACM 1-58113-930-6/04/10.
15. Reijers H.A and Jansen-Vullers M.H. 2004, Better processes = Better e-commerce.. Quality Progress, 38(3): 57-63.
16. Reijers H.A and Liman Mansar S. 2005, Best practices in Business Process Redesign: An Overview and Qualitative Evaluation of Successful Redesign Heuristics.. Omega, the International Journal of Management Science, 33(4): 283-306.
17. Navarra D.D and Cornford T. 2003, A policy making view of e-government innovations in public governance.. Proceedings of the ninth Americas conference on information systems. Tampa, FL.
18. Sakowickz. 2003. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ nispacee/unpan009486.pdf.
19. Sharifi H and Zarei B. 2004, An adaptive approach for implementing e-government in I.R. Iran.. Journal of Government Information, 30(5/6): 600-619.
20. Sikorski M. 2004, Opportunities and Barriers in Implementing e-Services for Citizens in Poland.. CHI 2004, April 24-29, Vienna, Austria. ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004.
21. Sang M, Lee Xin Tan and Trimi S. 2005, Current Practices of leading e-government countries.. Communications of the ACM, October 2005, 48(10).
22. Teicher J and Dow N. 2002, E-government in Australia: Promise and Progress.. Information Polity, l7: 231-246.
23. UN report, United Arab Emirates. Public administration country Profile.. March 2004.
24. UNPAN/2005/14, UN Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005, From e-government to einclusion. . The United Nations Online Public Network and Finance (UNPAN).
25. Vintar M, Kunstelj M, Decman M and Bercic B. 2003, Development of e-government in Slovenia.. Information Polity, 8:133-149.
26. Watson R.T and Mundy B. 2001..A strategic perspective of electronic democracy.. Communications of the ACM, 44: 27-30.
27. Weiling Ke and Lwok Kee Wei. 2004, Successful E-Government in Singapore.. Communications of the ACM, 47(6).
28. Zhou Q. 2005, National & Municipal Government Websites: A Comparison Between the United States and China.. Communications of the ACM, 48(10).