Public values: An inventory

Administration and Society

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 354-381

  Jørgensen, Torben Beck ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Proximity of values; Public values; Values causality; Values hierarchy

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247265439     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399707300703     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Antonsen, M., & Beck Jørgensen, T. (1997). The 'publicness' of public organizations. Public Administration, 75, 337-357.
2. Beck Jørgensen, T. (1993). Modes of governance and administrative change. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. New government-society interactions (pp. 219-232). London: Sage.
3. Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2001). Decentering tradition: Interpreting British government. Administration & Society, 33 (2). 107-132.
4. Bohman, J. (2000). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bozeman, B. (2002). Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62, 134-151.
7. Brereton, M., & Temple, M. (1999). The new public service ethos: An ethical environment for governance. Public Administration, 77, 455-474.
8. Butler, R. (1993). The evolution of the civil service-A progress report. Public Administration, 71, 395-406.
9. Butler, R. (1994). Reinventing British government. Public Administration, 72, 263-270.
10. Caiden, G.E. (1991). Administrative reform comes of age. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
11. Chapman R. A. (Ed.). (1993). Ethics in public service. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
12. Christensen T., & Lægreid, P. (1997). Forvaltningspolitikk-mot new public management [Administrative reform policies-Toward new public management]. In T. Christensen & M. Egeberg (Eds.), Forvaltningskunnskap (pp. iii - vi). Oslo, Norway: Tano-Aschehoug.
13. Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. (1953). Politics, economics and welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. deLeon, L. (1994). The professional values of public managers, policy analysts and politicians. Public Personnel Management, 23, 135-152.
15. Denhardt, K.G. (1988). The ethics of public service. Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations. New York: Greenwood Press.
16. Denhardt, R.B. (1993). The pursuit of significance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
17. DJF' s fagligt etiske arbejdsgruppe. (1993). Fagligt etiske principper i offentlig administration. Betænkning afgivet af DJF' s fagligt etiske arbejdsgruppe [Professional and ethical principles in public administration. Report prepared by the Public Employees' Union]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Jurist-og konomforbundets Forlag.
18. Egeberg, M. (1994). Verdier i statsstyre og noen organisatoriske implikasjoner [Governmental values and organizational implications]. In T. Christensen & M. Egeberg (Eds.), Forvaltningskunnskap (pp. 334-351). Oslo, Norway: Tano.
19. Eriksen, E.O. (1993). Den offentlige dimension. Verdier og styring i offentlig sektor [The public dimension. Values and governance in the public sector]. Bergen, Norway: Tano.
20. Forvaltningspolitiska Kommssionen. (1997). I medborgarnas tjänst. En samlet Förvaltningspolitik för staten [Public service. General principles in central government] (SOU 1997:57). Stockholm, Sweden: Finansdepartementet.
21. Frederickson, H.G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Goodsell, C.T. (1989). Balancing competing values. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 575-601). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Goodsell, C.T. (1990). Public administration and the public interest. In G. L. Wamsley (Ed.), Refounding public administration (pp. 96-113). London: Sage.
24. Goodsell, C.T. (1994). The case for bureaucracy. Chatham, UK: Chatham House.
25. Greenaway, J. (1995). Having the bun and the halfpenny: Can old public service ethics survive in the new Whitehall? Public Administration, 73, 358-374.
26. Gregersen, T. (1996). Politiske værdier i et pluralistisk samfund-et forsvar for Rawls [Political values in a pluralistic society-A defense of Rawls]. Politica, 28, 405-423.
27. Harmon, M., & Mayer, R. (1986). Organization theory for public organizations. Boston: Little, Brown.
28. Heffron, F. (1989). Organization theory and public organizations: The political connection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Hermansen-utvalget. (1989). En bedre organisert stat [A better organized state] (NOU 1989:5). Oslo, Norway: Statens Trykningskontor.
30. Hesse, J.J. (1993). Introduction. Public Administration, 71, 367-404.
31. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69 (1). 3-19.
32. Hooijkaas Wik, M. (2001). Verdier og tilknytningsformer-en studie av vektlegging av verdier og hensyn i virksomhet med ulik tilknytningsform til staten [Values and interorganizational relations-A study of values in state organizations with varying principal-agency relations]. Bergen, Norway: LOS-senteret.
33. Keating, M. (1995). Public service values. Australian Quarterly, 67 (4). 15-25.
34. Keraudren, P. (1995). Administrative reform, ethics, and openness: The balance between effectiveness and administrative identity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61 (1). 41-60.
35. Kernaghan, K. (1994). The emerging public service culture: Values, ethics, and reforms. Canadian Public Administration, 37, 614-630.
36. Kickert, W.J.M. (1997). Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American 'managerialism.' Public Administration, 75, 731-752.
37. Lawton, A., & Rose, A.G. (1994). Organisation and management in the public sector. London: Pitman Publishing.
38. Lundquist, L. (1998). Demokratins väktare [Guardians of democracy]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
39. Lundquist, L. (2001). Medborgardemokratin och eliterna [Citizen-oriented democracy and elites]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
40. Melchior, M., & Melchior, A. (2001). A case for particularism in public administration. Administration & Society, 33, 251-275.
41. Milward, H.B. (1996). The changing character of the public sector. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 77-91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Boston: Harvard University Press.
43. Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life. (1995). Standards in public life. First report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. London: HMSO.
44. Oecd. (1995). Governance in transition. Public management reforms in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
45. Oecd. (1996 a). Ethics in the public service. Paris: OECD.
46. Oecd. (1996 b). Ministerial symposium on the future of public services. Paris: OECD.
47. Quinn, R.E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5, 122-140.
48. Rainey, H.G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Smith, J. (1991). The public service ethos. Public Administration, 69, 515-523.
50. Stewart, J., & Clarke, M. (1987). The public service orientation: Issues and dilemmas. Public Administration, 65, 161-177.
51. Stewart, J., & Walsh, K. (1992). Change in the management of public services. Public Administration, 70, 499-518.
52. Toonen, T.A.J. (1993). Analysing institutional change and administrative transformation: A comparative view. Public Administration, 71, 151-168.
53. Van Deth, J.W., & Scarbrough, E. (1995). The impact of values. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press/European Science Foundation.
54. Van Dyke, V. (1962). The study of values in political science. Journal of Politics, 43 (3). 2-34. Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing public sector values. Hamden, CT: Garland.
55. Wamsley, G.L., & Wolf, J.F. (1996). Refounding democratic public administration. Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges. London: Sage.
56. Weatherford, M.S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86 (1). 149-166.