Interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites: What kind, how much and why?

Convergence

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 195-213

  Larsson, Anders Olof ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

citizen journalism; interactivity; journalism; online newspapers; Sweden

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860381639     PISSN: 13548565     EISSN: 17487382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354856511430184     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adams JW. U.S. weekly newspapers embrace web sites. Newspaper Research Journal. 2007 ; 28 (4). 36-50
2. Aikat DD. News on the Web: Usage trends of an on-line newspaper. Convergence. 1998 ; 4 (4). 94-110
3. allebolag.se (n.d.) Available at: http://allabolag.se/(accessed 21 November 2011).
4. Arant MD, Anderson JQ. Newspaper online editors support traditional standards. Newspaper Research Journal. 2001 ; 22 (4). 57
5. Bagdikian BH The New Media Monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press ; 2004 :
6. Balsvik G Information Technology Users: Studies of Self-Efficacy and Creativity among Swedish Newspaper Journalists. Stockholm: Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics ; 2004 :
7. Beam RA. The impact of group ownership variables on organizational professionalism at daily newspapers. Journalism Quarterly. 1993 ; 70 (4). 907-918
8. Boczkowski PJ The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. Lievrouw L Livingstone S, ed. London: SAGE ; 2002: 270-286.
9. Boczkowski PJ Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge, MA MIT Press ; 2004 :
10. Bucy EP. Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. The Information Society: An International Journal. 2004 ; 20 (5). 373-383
11. Carlsson U, Facht U Medie-Sverige: Statistik och analys. 2007. Göteborg: Nordicom-Sverige ; 2007 :
12. Chan-Olmsted S, Park J. From on-air to online world: Examining the content and structures of broadcast TV stations' web sites. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000 ; 77 (2). 321-339
13. Chung DS Into interactivity? How news websites use interactive features. Paper presented at International Communication Association Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA. Washington, DC: ICA ; 2004: 27-31.
14. Chung DS. Profits and perils: Online news producers' perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence. 2007 ; 13 (1). 43-61
15. Chung DS. Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008 ; 13 (3). 658-679
16. Chung DS, Nah S. The effects of interactive news presentation on perceived user satisfaction of online community newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009 ; 14 (4). 855-874
17. Chyi HI, Sylvie G. Competing with whom? Where? And how? A structural analysis of the electronic newspaper market. Journal of Media Economics. 1998 ; 11 (2). 1-18
18. Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates ; 1988 :
19. dagspress.se (n.d.) Swedish Newspaper Publishers' Association. Available at: http://www.dagspress.se/(accessed 21 November 2011).
20. Deuze M. The Web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society. 2003 ; 5 (2). 203-230
21. Deuze M, Dimoudi C. Online journalists in the Netherlands: Towards a profile of a new profession. Journalism. 2002 ; 3 (1). 85-100
22. Dibean W, Garrison B. How six online newspapers use web technologies. Newspaper Research Journal. 2001 ; 22 (2). 79-94
23. Domingo D. Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008 ; 13 (3). 680-704
24. Downes EJ, McMillan SJ. Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media & Society. 2000 ; 2 (2). 157-179
25. Engebretsen M. Shallow and static or deep and dynamic? Studying the state of online journalism in scandinavia. Nordicom Review. 2006 ; 27 (1). 3-16
26. FachtU (2008) Nordicom-Sveriges Internetbarometer 2007. MedieNotiser. Available at: http://www.nordicom.gu.se/?portal=mr&main=info-publ2. php&ex=266(accessed November 2011).
27. Frigyes P. Västmakten vill växa vidare. Journalisten. 2008 ; 13 November-3 December: 4-6
28. Frisk J. Medier bjuder in engagerade läsare. Journalisten. 2008 ; 18-31 March: 14-16
29. Gerpott TJ, Wanke H. Interactivity potentials and usage of German press-title web sites: An empirical investigation. Journal of Media Economics. 2004 ; 17 (4). 241-260
30. Gillmor D We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly ; 2004 :
31. Greer J, Mensing D Internet Newspapers: The Making of a Mainstream Medium. Li X, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ; 2006: 13-32.
32. Gubman J, Greer J Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention, Newspaper Division. Chicago, IL: USA ; 1997 :
33. Hadenius S, Weibull L. The Swedish newspaper system in the late 1990s. Tradition and transition. Nordicom Review. 1999 ; 20 (1). 129-152
34. Holsti OR Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley ; 1969 :
35. Hujanen J, Pietikainen S. Interactive uses of journalism: Crossing between technological potential and young people's news-using practices. New Media & Society. 2004 ; 6 (3). 383-401
36. Jensen JF. Interactivity: Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review. 1998 ; 19 (1). 19
37. Karlsson M Nätjournalistik: en explorativ fallstudie av digitala mediers karaktärsdrag på fyra svenska nyhetssajter. Lund Lunds universitet: Avdelningen för medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap ; 2006 :
38. Kiernan V, Levy MR. Competition among broadcast-related web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 1999 ; 43 (2). 271-279
39. Kiousis S. Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society. 2002 ; 4 (3). 355-383
40. Koehler W. Web page change and persistence-A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2002 ; 53 (2). 162-171
41. Koolstra CM, Bos MJW. The development of an instrument to determine different levels of interactivity. International Communication Gazette. 2009 ; 71 (5). 373-391
42. Krippendorff K Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 2004 :
43. Lacy S. A model of demand for news: Impact of competition on newspaper content. Journalism Quarterly. 1989 ; 66 (1). 41 128-48
44. Lin CA, Jeffres LW. Comparing distinctions and similarities across websites of newspapers, radio stations, and television stations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2001 ; 78 (3). 555-573
45. Liu YP, Shrum LJ. A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of Advertising. 2009 ; 38 (2). 53-68
46. Martin SE, Hansen KA Newspapers of Record in a Digital Age: From Hot Type to Hot Link. Westport, CT: Praeger ; 1998 :
47. Massey BL. Market-based predictors of interactivity at Southeast Asian online newspapers. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 2000 ; 10 (3). 227-237
48. McManus JH Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware?. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 1994 :
49. McMillan SJ Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. MA Shaver, ed. East Lansing, MI Richmond, VA: Michigan State University American Academy of Advertising ; 2000a: 71-78.
50. McMillan SJ. The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000b ; 77 (1). 80-98
51. McMillan SJ The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. Lievrouw L Livingstone S, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 2002a: 163-182.
52. McMillan SJ. A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media & Society. 2002b ; 4 (2). 271-291
53. McMillan SJ, Hwang JS. Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising. 2002 ; 31 (3). 29-42
54. McMillan SJ, Hwang JS, Lee G. Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website. Journal of Advertising Research. 2003 ; 43 (4). 400-409
55. Mitchelstein E, Boczkowski PJ. Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism. 2009 ; 10 (5). 562-586
56. Nerone J, Barnhurst KG. Beyond modernism: Digital design, Americanization and the future of newspaper form. New Media & Society. 2001 ; 3 (4). 467-482
57. Newhagen JE, Cordes JW. Nightly@nbc.com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of Communication. 1995 ; 45 (3). 164
58. OutingS (2001) News Sites Repeat the Mistakes of the Past: We Still Don't Recognize the Power of Interactivity. Available at: http://www. editorandpublisher.com/editorandpublisher/features-columns/article-display.jsp? vnu-content-id=1461161(accessed 13 october 2009).
59. Pavlik J. The impact of technology on journalism. Journalism Studies. 2000 ; 1 (2). 229-237
60. Peng FY, Tham NI, Xiaoming H. Trends in online newspapers: A look at the US web. Newspaper Research Journal. 1999 ; 20 (2). 52-63
61. Picard RG Media Economics: Concepts and Issues. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE ; 1989 :
62. Quinn G, Trench B Online news media and their audiences: Multimedia content in the digital age. MUDIA. Heerlen, the Netherlands: IST ; 2002 :
63. Rafaeli S, Sudweeks F. Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1997 ; 2 (4). 1-6
64. Riley PK, Colleen M, Christiansen T, et al. Community or colony: The case of online newspapers and the web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1998 ; 4 (1). 1-14
65. Schultz T. Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1999 ; 5 (1). 1-24
66. Schultz T. Mass media and the concept of interactivity: An exploratory study of online forums and reader email. Media, Culture & Society. 2000 ; 22 (2). 205-221
67. Shyam Sundar S. The Internet-multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism Quarterly. 2000 ; 77 (5). 480-499
68. Sohn DY, Lee BK. Dimensions of interactivity: Differential effects of social and psychological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2005 ; 10 (3). 1-16
69. Sohn DY, Ci C, Lee BK. The moderating effects of expectation on the patterns of the interactivity-attitude relationship. Journal of Advertising. 2007 ; 36 (3). 109-119
70. Song JH, Zinkhan GM. Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing. 2008 ; 72 (2). 99-113
71. Sundar SS. Theorizing interactivity's effects. The Information Society: An International Journal. 2004 ; 20 (5). 385-389
72. Sundar SS. Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000 ; 77 (3). 480-499
73. Tankard J, Ban H Annual Convention of the Association for Journalism and Mass Communication. Baltimore, MD: USA ; 1998: 5-8.
74. Thurman N. Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society. 2008 ; 10 (1). 139-157
75. ThurmanNMyllylahtiM (2009) Taking the paper out of news. Journalism Studies10(5): 691-708.
76. twingly.com (n.d.) Available at: http://www.twingly.com/(accessed 21 November 2011).
77. Walther JB, Burgoon JK. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research. 1992 ; 19 (1). 50-88
78. Weare C, Lin WY. Content analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and challenges. Social Science Computer Review. 2000 ; 18 (3). 272-292
79. Wimmer R, Dominick J Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont, CA and London: Thomson Wadsworth ; 2006 :
80. Wu G Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. MS Roberts, ed. Gainesville Richmond, VA: University of Florida, USA American Academy of Advertising ; 1999: 254-262.
81. Zeng Q, Li X Internet Newspapers: The Making of a Mainstream Medium. Li X, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ; 2006: 139-158.