Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 659-682

  Matz, Rebecca L ^a   Rothman, Edward D ^a   Krajcik, Joseph S ^b   Banaszak Holl, Mark M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

college university; concurrent enrollment; final course grades; general chemistry; lecture and laboratory; withdrawal retention rate

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY; CONCURRENT ENROLLMENT; FINAL COURSE GRADES; GENERAL CHEMISTRY; WITHDRAWAL/RETENTION RATE;

CHEMISTRY; CURRICULA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENTS;

LABORATORIES;

EID: 84860376311     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21016     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Angel, S. A., &, LaLonde, D. E., (1998). Science success strategies: An interdisciplinary course for improving science and mathematics education. Journal of Chemical Education, 75 (11), 1437-1441. (Pubitemid 128594369)
2. Bailey, C., Kingsbury, K., Kulinowski, K., Paradis, J., &, Schoonover, R., (2000). An integrated lecture-laboratory environment for general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77 (2), 195-1199.
3. Baker, N., &, Verran, J., (2004). The future of microbiology laboratory classes-Wet, dry or in combination ? Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2 (4), 338-342. (Pubitemid 39490103)
4. Banilower, E. R., Green, S., &, Smith, P. S., (2004). Analysis of data of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education for the Committee on High School Science Laboratories (September). Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
5. Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein, A., Samuel, D., &, Kempa, R. F., (1976). The attitude of high school students towards the use of filmed experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 53 (9), 575-577.
6. Bowen, C. W., (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77 (1), 116-119.
7. Bransford, J. D., &, Schwartz, D. L., (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In, A. Iran-Nejad, &, P. D. Pearson, (Eds.), Review of research in education, no. 24 (pp. 61-100). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
8. Bybee, R. W., (1970). The effectiveness of an individualized approach to a general education earth science laboratory. Science Education, 54 (2), 157-161.
9. Carnduff, J., &, Reid, N., (2003). Enhancing undergraduate chemistry laboratories-Pre-laboratory and post-laboratory exercises. London, England: Royal Society of Chemistry.
10. Cavagnetto, A. R., (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80 (3), 336-371.
11. Cawley, J. J., (1992). Lecture or laboratory: Choosing between two "goods ". Journal of Chemical Education, 69 (8), 642.
12. Chin, C., &, Osborne, J., (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (7), 883-908.
13. Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., &, Steinert, J. J., (2007). Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3 (1), 010106.
14. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
15. Cooper, M. M., (1994). Cooperative chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 71 (4), 307.
16. Cooper, M. M., (1995). Cooperative learning: An approach for large enrollment courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 72 (2), 162-164.
17. Cooper, M. M., Cox, C. T., Nammouz, M., Case, E., &, Stevens, R., (2008). An assessment of the effect of collaborative groups on students' problem-solving strategies and abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 85 (6), 866-872.
18. Cooper, M. M., &, Kerns, T. S., (2006). Changing the laboratory: Effects of a laboratory course on students' attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83 (9), 1356-1361. (Pubitemid 44317056)
19. Creswell, J. W., (2008). Analyzing and interpreting quantitative data. In Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
20. Daempfle, P. A., (2003-2004). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention, 5 (1), 37-52.
21. Daugherty, T. K., &, Lane, E. J., (1999). A longitudinal study of academic social predictors of college attrition. Social Behavior Personality: An International Journal, 27 (4), 355-361.
22. DiBiase, W. J., &, Wagner, E. P., (2002). Aligning general chemistry laboratory with lecture at a large university. School Science Mathematics, 102 (4), 158-171.
23. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., &, Scott, P., (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
24. Driver, R., Newton, P., &, Osborne, J., (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84 (3), 287-312.
25. Dubravcic, M. F., (1979). Practical alternatives to laboratory in a basic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 56 (4), 235-237.
26. Edwards, J., Roberts, S., &, Pitter, G., (2010, November). A formula for success in general chemistry: Increasing student performance in a barrier course. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Student Retention, Mobile, AL.
27. Fayowski, V., &, MacMillan, P. D., (2008). An evaluation of the supplemental instruction programme in a first year calculus course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39 (7), 843-855.
28. Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. C., Stowe, K. A., &, Showman, R., (2010). Translating expertise into effective instruction: The impacts of cognitive task analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (10), 1165-1185.
29. Field, A. P., (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll). London, England: Sage.
30. Fincher, C., (1974). Is the SAT worth its salt? An evaluation of the use of the Scholastic Aptitude Test in the university system of Georgia over a thirteen-year period. Review of Educational Research, 44 (3), 293-305.
31. Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., &, Brickman, P., (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (8), 1088-1107. (Pubitemid 47573896)
32. Goldstein, M. T., &, Perin, D., (2008). Predicting performance in a community college content-area course from academic skill level. Community College Review, 36 (2), 89-115.
33. Hall, R. H., Collier, H. L., Thomas, M. L., &, Hilgers, M. G., (2005, August). A student response system for increasing engagement, motivation, and learning in high enrollment lectures. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE.
34. Hausmann, R. G. M., Chi, M. T. H., &, Roy, M., (2004, August). Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three hypothesized mechanisms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
35. Heller, P., &, Hollabaugh, M., (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 637-644.
36. Hill, B. W., (1976). Using college chemistry to influence creativity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13 (1), 71-77.
37. Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M. J., &, Knight, R. D., (2005). A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms. American Journal of Physics, 73 (5), 459-462. (Pubitemid 40771789)
38. Hofstein, A., &, Lunetta, V. N., (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52 (2), 201-217.
39. Hofstein, A., &, Lunetta, V. N., (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88 (1), 28-54. (Pubitemid 38544888)
40. Hogan, K., (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (10), 1085-1109. (Pubitemid 129534737)
41. Horton, P. B., Fronk, R. H., &, Walton, R. W., (1985). The effect of writing assignments on achievement in college general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (6), 535-541.
42. Hutcheson, G., &, Sofroniou, N., (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London, England: Sage.
43. Johnson, D. W., &, Johnson, R. T., (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
44. Kerner, N. K., &, Penner-Hahn, J. E., (2010). Collaborative investigations in general chemistry. Plymouth, MI: Hayden-McNeil Publishing.
45. Lederman, N. G., (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 331-359.
46. Little, R. J. A., &, Rubin, D. B., (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
47. Long, D. D., McLaughlin, G. W., &, Bloom, A. M., (1986). The influence of physics laboratories on student performance in a lecture course. American Journal of Physics, 54 (2), 122-125.
48. Lumpe, A. T., &, Staver, J. R., (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 71-98.
49. Maltese, A. V., &, Tai, R. H., (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95 (5), 877-907.
50. Marshall, J. A., &, Dorward, J. T., (2000). Inquiry experiences as a lecture supplement for preservice elementary teachers and general education students. American Journal of Physics, 68 (S1), S27-S36.
51. Martens, E., (2007). Communicating science to the first degree. ACS Chemical Biology, 2 (8), 501-503. (Pubitemid 350011307)
52. McKinney, K., (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
53. Meltzer, D. E., (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible "hidden variable" in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70 (12), 1259-1268. (Pubitemid 36016558)
54. Millar, R., (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision. Available at: [accessed August 2010].
55. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., &, Century, J., (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (4), 474-496.
56. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Academy Press.
57. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. In, J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, &, R. R. Cocking, (Eds.), Committee on developments in the science of learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
58. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. In, M. S. Donovan, &, J. D. Bransford, (Eds.), Committee on how people learn: A targeted report for teachers. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
59. National Research Council. (2006). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. In, S. R. Singer, M. L. Hilton, &, H. A. Schweingruber, (Eds.), Committee on high school science laboratories: Role and vision. Washington, D.C.: Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies Press.
60. Nicoll, G., &, Francisco, J. S., (2001). An investigation of the factors influencing student performance in physical chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78 (1), 99-102. (Pubitemid 33653615)
61. Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., Allen, D., Hunt, W. F., Hutson, J., &, Pitts, A., (2004). Effects of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 81 (3), 441-448.
62. Pascarella, E. T., &, Terenzini, P. T., (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63. Paul, A. E., (1983). The comparative effects of teacher-demonstration and self-paced instruction on concept acquisition and problem-solving skills of college level chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20 (8), 795-801.
64. Peterfreund, A. R., Rath, K. A., Xenos, S. P., &, Bayliss, F., (2007-2008). The impact of supplemental instruction on students in STEM courses: Results from San Francisco State University. Journal of College Student Retention, 9 (4), 487-503.
65. Raghubir, K. P., (1979). Research reports: The laboratory-investigative approach to science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16 (1), 13-17.
66. Renner, J. W., &, Fix, W. T., (1979). Chemistry and the experiment in the secondary schools. Journal of Chemical Education, 56 (11), 737-740.
67. Richmond, G., &, Striley, J., (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (8), 839-858. (Pubitemid 126420872)
68. Saunders, W. L., &, Dickinson, D. H., (1979). A comparison of community college students' achievement and attitude changes in a lecture-only and lecture-laboratory approach to general education biological science courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16 (5), 459-464.
69. Seymour, E., &, Hewitt, N. M., (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70. Shavelson, R. J., (1996). Linear regression. In, S. W. Wakely, (Ed.), Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
71. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., &, Donovan, S. S., (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69 (1), 21-51.
72. Stevens, R., Soller, A., Cooper, M. M., &, Sprang, M., (2004). Modeling the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry with a web-based tutor. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference Proceedings, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceiõ, Alagoas, Brasil.
73. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., &, Scott, J., (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35 (5), 513-547.
74. Sue, S., &, Abe, J., (1988). Predictors of academic achievement among Asian American and white students (College Board Report No. 88-11). Retrieved from The College Board website
75. Teixeira-Dias, J. J. C., Pedrosa de Jesus, H., &, Neri de Souza, F., (2005). Teaching for quality learning in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (9), 1123-1137. (Pubitemid 41030401)
76. The College Board. (2006). SAT-ACT concordance tables. Retrieved from
77. Tien, L. T., Roth, V., &, Kampmeier, J. A., (2002). Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (7), 606-632.
78. Ting, S.-M. R., &, Robinson, T. L., (1998). First-year academic success: A prediction combining cognitive and psychosocial variables for Caucasian and African American students. Journal of College Student Development, 39 (6), 599-610. (Pubitemid 128458810)
79. Totten, S., (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
80. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of education statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015), Chapter 3, Tables 199 and 235. Retrieved from
81. Walvoord, B. E., (2004). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
82. Washam, C., (2007, Autumn). Where's the lab?: American students miss out on hands-on science. Chemistry.
83. Wheatley, J. H., (1975). Evaluating cognitive learnings in the college science laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12 (2), 101-109.
84. White, B. Y., &, Frederiksen, J. R., (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1), 3-118. (Pubitemid 128343737)
85. Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., &, Carlson, J., (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (3), 276-301.
86. Wojcik, J. F., (1990). Chemistry service courses: Dispense with the lab ? Journal of Chemical Education, 67 (7), 587-588.
87. Wolfe, R. N., &, Johnson, S. D., (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55 (2), 177-185.
88. Wrensford, G., &, Wrensford, L., (2003). Enhanced student learning of chemistry in a computer assisted environment. Reaching Through Teaching, 15, 32-42.
89. Zimmerman, C., (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149.