Emergent technologies, network paradoxes, and incrementalism

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 821-828

  Low, Brian ^a   Johnston, Wesley ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b The University of the West Indies   (Jamaica)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergent technologies; Incrementalism; Muddling through; Relational models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860355908     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andersson U., Holm D., Johanson M. Moving or doing? Knowledge flow, problem solving, and change in industrial networks. J Bus Res 2007, 60:32-40.
2. Ardnt J. Towards a concept of domesticated markets. J Mark 1962, 43:69-75.
3. Baty C. Born to be kings: titanic Telco versus omnipotent outsourcers - there can be only one 2005, Gartner Outsourcing Summit.
4. Birkinshaw J., Gibson C. Building ambidexterity into an organization. Sloan Manage Rev 2004, 45(4):47-55.
5. Christensen C.M., Overdorf M. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harv Bus Rev 2000, 67-76. March-April.
6. Day S., Schoemaker P., Gunther R. Wharton on managing emerging technologies 2002, John Wiley & Sons.
7. Dittrich K., Jaspers F., Valk W., Wynstra F. Dealing with dualities. Ind Mark Manag 2006, 35:792-796.
8. Easton G. Industrial networks: a review. Industrial networks: a new view of reality 1992, Routledge, London. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
9. Eisenhart K.M. Building theories from case research. Acad Manage Rev 1989, 14(4):532-550.
10. Fioca R., Snehota I. Marketing e alta tecnologia. Sviluppo Organizzazione 1986, 98:24-31.
11. Geersbro J., Ritter T. External performance barriers in business networks. J Bus Ind Mktg 2010, 25(3):196-201.
12. Grant R. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ Sci 1996, 7(4):375-387.
13. Hakansson H., Ford D. How should companies interact in business networks?. J Bus Res 2002, 55(2):133-139.
14. Hakansson H., Johanson J. A model of industrial networks. Industrial networks: a new view of reality 1992, 28-34. Routledge, London. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
15. Hakansson H., Snehota I. Developing business relationships in business networks 1995, Routledge, London.
16. Harrison D., Easton G. Patterns of actor response to environmental change. J Bus Res 2002, 55:542-552.
17. Hausman A., Johnston W. Extending the marriage metaphor in understanding long-terms business relationships. J Bus Ind Mktg 2006, 21(7):446-452.
18. Johnston W., Bonoma T. The buying center: structure and interaction patterns. J Mark 1981, 45:143-156.
19. Johnston W., Lewin J. Organizational buying behavior: toward an integrated framework. J Bus Res 1996, 35:1-15.
20. Lee J., Qualls W. A dynamic process of buyer-seller technology adoption. J Bus Ind Mktg 2010, 25(3):220-228.
21. Lindblom C. The science of "muddling through". Public Adm Rev 1959, 19(2):79-88.
22. Lindblom C. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 1979, 39(6):517-526.
23. Low B. Long-term relationships in industrial marketing: reality or rhetoric?. Ind Mark Manag 1996, 25:23-35.
24. Low B., Johnston W. Relationship equity and switching behavior in the adoption of new telecommunication services. Ind Mark Manag 2006, 35(6):676-689.
25. Mattsson L.-G. Management of strategic change in a "Market-as-Networks" perspective 1988, Oxford.
26. Moorman C., Miner A.S. The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in new product development. J Mark 1998, 62:1-20.
27. Nielsen E.H., Rao M.V.H. The strategy-legitimacy nexus: a thick description. Acad Manage Rev 1987, 12:523-533.
28. Nohria N. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations?. Networks and organizations 1992, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA. N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.).
29. O'Driscoll A. Exploring paradox in marketing: managing ambiguity towards synthesis. J Bus Ind Mark 2008, 23(2):95-104.
30. Powell W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 1990, 12:295-336.
31. Raynor M. The strategy paradox 2007, Doubleday Publication, New York.
32. Slotegraaf R., Dickson P. The paradox of a marketing planning capability. J Acad Mark Sci 2004, 32(4):371-385.
33. Solomon L. Improvisation II. Perspective. New Music 1986, 24:224-235.
34. Sundaramurthy C., Lewis M. Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance. Acad Manage Rev 2003, 28(3):397-415.
35. The Age Telstra sells IT division for $200million http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-business/telstra-sells-it-division-for-200m-20090302-8lor.html.2009.
36. Woodhouse E.J., Collingridge D. Incrementalism, intelligent trial-and-error, and the future of political decision theory. An heretical heir of the enlightenment: politics, policy and science in the work of Charles E. Limdblom 1993, Westview Press, Boulder. H. Redner (Ed.).
37. Yin R.K. Case study research: design and methods 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.