The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness of workplace based assessments: A systematic review

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Saedon, Habiba ^a   Salleh, Shizalia ^b   Balakrishnan, Arun ^c   Imray, Christopher He ^b   Saedon, Mahmud ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD; WORKPLACE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84860325032     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-25     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Van De Ridder JM, Stokking KM, Mcgaghie WC, Ten Cate OT: What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008, 42:189?197.
2. Norcini J, Burch V: Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No 31. Med Teach 2007, 29:855?871.
3. Miller A, Archer J: Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ 2010, 341:c5064. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5064.
4. Berlin JA, University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group: Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Lancet 1997, 350(9072):185?186.
5. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, McKinstry B: The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice. BEME Guide No 10. Med Teach 2008, 30(2):124?145.
6. Kirkpatrick D: Evaluation of Training. In Training and Development Handbook. Edited by Craig R, Bittel L. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967:131?167.
7. Archer J, McGraw M, Davies H: Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme. Postgrad Med J 2010, 86 (1019):526?31.
8. Bullock AD, Hassell A, Markham WA, Wall DW, Whitehouse AB: How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors. Med Educ 2009, 43(6):516?520.
9. Burford B, Illing J, Kergon C, Morrow G, Livingston M: User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors. Med Educ. 2010, 44 (2):165?76. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
10. Canavan C, Holtman MC, Richmond M, Katsufrakis PJ: The quality of written comments on professional behaviors in a developmental multisource feedback program. Acad Med 2010, 85(10 Suppl):S106?S109
11. Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H: Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme. Med Educ 2008, 42(10):1007?1013.
12. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J: Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007, 41:583?591.
13. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S: Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005, 39(5):497?504.
14. Weller JM, Jones A, Merry AF, Jolly B, Saunders D: Investigation of trainee and specialist reactions to the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in anaesthesia: implications for implementation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103 (4):524?30.
15. Weller JM, Jolly B, Misur MP, Merry AF, Jones A, Crossley JG, Pedersen K, Smith K: Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. Br J Anaesth 2009, 102(5):633?641.
16. Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ: Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 2004, 19(5 Pt 2):558?561.
17. James K, Cross K, Lucarotti ME, Fowler AL, Cook TA: Undertaking procedure-based assessment is feasible in clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009, 91(2):110?112.
18. Marriott J, Purdie H, Crossley J, Beard JD: Evaluation of procedure-based assessment for assessing trainees' skills in the operating theatre. Br J Surg 2010, 98(3):450?457.
19. Murphy DJ, Bruce DA, Mercer SW, Eva KW: The reliability of workplacebased assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: a national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009, 14(2):219?232.
20. Cohen SN, Farrant PB, Taibjee SM: Assessing the assessments: U.K. dermatology trainees' views of the workplace assessment tools. Br J Dermatol 2009, 16(1):34?39.
21. Johnson G, Barrett J, Jones M, Parry D, Wade W: Feedback from educational supervisors and trainees on the implementation of curricula and the assessment system for core medical training. Clin Med 2008, 8 (5):484?489.
22. Abdulla A: A critical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT). J R Soc Med 2008, 101:22?26.
23. Hattie J, Timperley H: The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007, 77:81?112.
24. Hewson MG, Little ML: Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998, 13:111?116.
25. Ende J: Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983, 250:777?781.
26. Saedon H, Saedon MH, Aggarwal SP: Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: Guide supplement 31.3?viewpoint. Med Teach 2010, 32 (9):e369?e372.
27. Papettas T, Saedon H, Saedon M: Opportunities for learning in the surgical workplace and how they can be exploited: a practical guide. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2011, 72(12):707?710.
28. McKinley RK, Williams V, Stephenson C: Improving the content of feedback. Clin Teach 2010, 7:161?166.