A critical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT)

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 22-26

  Abdulla, Aza ^a  

^a Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SKILL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MINI PEER ASSESSMENT TOOL; PEER REVIEW; PRODUCTIVITY; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; VALIDITY;

EID: 40949137060     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2007.070077     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Southgate L, Cox T, David T, et al. The General Medical Council's performance procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace. Med Educ 2001;35(Suppl 1):9-19
2. Matthews BP, Redman T. The attitudes of service industry managers toward upward appraisal. Career Develop Int 1997;2:46-53
3. Atwater LA, Waldmand D, Atwater RD, Cartier A. An upward feedback field experiment. Supervisor's cynicism, follow-up and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology 2000;53:275-97
4. Kluger AN, Denisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-anaylsis, and a preliminary feedback theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119:254-84
5. Bret J, Atwater L. 360-degree feedback: accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol 2001;86:930-42
6. Blurton RR, Mazzaferri EL. Assessment of interpersonal skills and humanistic qualities in medical residents. Med Educ 1985;60:648-50
7. Linn LS, Dimatteo MR, Cope DW, Robbins A. Measuring physicians' humanistic attitudes, values, and behaviours. Med Care 1987;25:504-13
8. Keynan A, Freidman M, Benbassat J. Reliability of global rating scales in the assessment of clinical competence of medical students. Med Educ 1987;21:477-81
9. Carline JD, Paauw DS, Thiede KW, Ramsey PG. Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students' clinical skills in a medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 1992;7:506-10
10. Glassock RJ, Benson JA, Copeland RB, et al. Time-limited certification and recertification: the program of the American Board of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:59-62
11. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, Logerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-60
12. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ 2003;326:546-8
13. Joshi R, Ling F, Jaeger J. Assessment of 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med 2004;79:458-63
14. Johnson D, Cujec B. Comparison of self, nurse and physician assessment of residents rotating through an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1811-6
15. Norcini JJ. Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 2003;37:539-43
16. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, Wenrich MD. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performance of practising physicians. Acad Med 1996;71:364-70
17. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta the physician achievement review. CMAJ 1999;161:52-7
18. Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies HA. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ 2005;330:1251-3
19. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 2001 See http://www.gmc-org.uk
20. Davies H, Archer J. Multi source Feedback: development and practical aspects. Clin Teacher 2005;2:77-81
21. Southgate L, Grant J. Principles of an assessment system for postgraduate medical training. London: PMETB, 2004 A working paper from the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board
22. The Foundation Programme Committee of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, in co-operation with Modernising Medical Careers in the Departments of Health. Curriculum for the Foundation Years in Postgraduate Education and Training. London: Department of Health, 2005
23. Lurie SJ, Nofziger AC, Meldrum S, Mooney C, Epstein RM. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students. Med Educ 2006;40:1088-97
24. Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH, editors. The Handbook for Multisource Feedback: the comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001
25. Johnson D, Cujec B. Comparison of self, nurse, and physician assessment of residents rotating through an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1811-6
26. Bing-You RG, Paterson J. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teacher 1997;19:40-4
27. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005;39:497-504
28. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007;41:583-91