Linear and non-linear QSAR modelling of juvenile hormone esterase inhibitors

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 357-369

  Devillers, J ^a   Doucet, J P ^b   Doucet Panaye, A ^b   Decourtye, A ^c   Aupinel, P ^d  

^a CTIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c Laboratoire de Toxicologie Environnementale   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

artificial neural network; juvenile hormone esterase; spline regression analysis; support vector regression; trifluoromethylketones

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; ENZYMES; ESTERS; LIFE CYCLE; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

DESCRIPTORS; ENDOCRINE FUNCTIONS; JUVENILE HORMONE; JUVENILE HORMONE ESTERASE; NON LINEAR; QSAR MODELING; SPLINE REGRESSION ANALYSE; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSIONS; TRICHOPLUSIA NI; TRIFLUOROMETHYLKETONE;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

HEXAPODA; TRICHOPLUSIA NI;

EID: 84860301441     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2012.664562     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Hartfelder, K. 2000. Insect juvenile hormone: From "status quo" to high society. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 33: 157-177.
2. Gilbert, LI, Granger, NA and Roe, RM. 2000. The juvenile hormones: Historical facts and speculations on future research directions. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol., 30: 617-644.
3. Palli, SR. 2010. "Recent advances in the mode of action of juvenile hormones and their analogs". In Biorational Control of Arthropod Pests, Edited by: Ishaaya, I. and Horowitz, A.R. 111-129. New York: Springer.
4. Kamita, SG and Hammock, BD. 2010. Juvenile hormone esterase: Biochemistry and structure. J. Pestic. Sci., 35: 265-274.
5. Kotaki, T, Shinada, T, Kaihara, K, Ohfune, Y and Numata, H. 2009. Structure determination of a new juvenile hormone from a heteropteran insect. Org. Lett., 11: 5234-5237.
6. Kamita, SG, Hinton, AC, Wheelock, CE, Wogulis, MD, Wilson, DK, Wolf, NM, Stok, JE, Hock, B and Hammock, BD. 2003. Juvenile hormone (JH) esterase: Why are you so JH specific?. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol., 33: 1261-1273.
7. Devillers, J. 2009. Endocrine Disruption Modeling, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
8. Moosus, M and Maran, U. 2011. Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of acute toxicity of diverse chemicals to Daphnia magna with whole molecule descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 22: 757-774.
9. Kar, S, Harding, AP, Roy, K and Popelier, PLA. 2010. QSAR with quantum topological molecular similarity indices: Toxicity of aromatic aldehydes to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 21: 149-168.
10. Sridhar, J, Foroozesh, M and Klein Stevens, CL. 2011. QSAR models of cytochrome P450 enzyme 1A2 inhibitors using CoMFA, CoMSIA and HQSAR. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 22: 681-697.
11. Todorov, M, Mombelli, E, Aït-Aïssa, S and Mekenyan, O. 2011. Androgen receptor binding affinity: A QSAR evaluation. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 22: 265-291.
12. Hammock, BD, Wing, KD, McLauglin, J, Lovell, VM and Sparks, T. 1982. Trifluoromethylketones as possible transition state analog inhibitors of juvenile hormone esterase. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 17: 76-88.
13. A Székács, B.D. Hammock, Y.A.I. Abdel-Aal, M. Philpott, and G. Matolcsy, Inhibition of juvenile hormone esterase by transition-state analogs. A tool for enzyme molecular biology, in Biotechnology for Crop Protection, ACS Symp. Ser. 379, P.A. Hedin, J.J. Menn, and R.M. Hollingworth, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1988,pp. 215-227
14. A Székács, B. Bordás, G. Matolcsy, and B.D. Hammock, Quantitative structure-activity relationship study of aromatic trifluoromethyl ketones. In vitro inhibitors of insect juvenile hormone esterase, in Probing Bioactive Mechanisms, ACS Symp. Ser. 413, P.S. Magee, D.R. Henry, and J.H. Block, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989,pp. 178-182
15. A Székács, B. Bordás, and B.D. Hammock, Transition state analog enzyme inhibitors: Structure-activity relationships of trifluoromethyl ketones, in Rational Approaches to Structure, Activity, and Ecotoxicology of Agrochemicals, ACS Symp. Ser., W. Draber and T. Fujita, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1992,pp. 219-249
16. Wheelock, CE, Nakagawa, Y, Akamatsu, M and Hammock, BD. 2003. Use of classical and 3-D QSAR to examine the hydration state of juvenile hormone esterase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 11: 5101-5116.
17. Hammock, BD and Sparks, TC. 1977. A rapid assay for insect juvenile hormone esterase activity. Anal. Biochem., 82: 573-579.
18. Devillers, J, Domine, D, Guillon, C and Karcher, W. 1998. Simulating lipophilicity of organic molecules with a back-propagation neural network. J. Pharm. Sci., 87: 1086-1090.
19. Devillers, J. 1999. Calculation of octanol/water partition coefficients for pesticides. A comparative study. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 10: 249-262.
20. Devillers, J. 1996. Genetic Algorithms in Molecular Modeling, London: Academic Press.
21. J. Devillers, Strengths and weaknesses of the backpropagation neural network in QSAR and QSPR studies, in Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design, J. Devillers, ed., Academic Press, London, 1996,pp. 1-46
22. Draper, N and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd, New York: Wiley.
23. Friedman, JH. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat., 19: 1-67.
24. Nguyen-Cong, V and Van Dang, G. 1996. Using multivariate adaptive regression splines to QSAR studies of dihydroartemisinin derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 31: 797-803.
25. Jalali-Heravi, M and Mani-Varnosfaderani, A. 2009. QSAR modeling of 1-(3,3-diphenylpropyl)-piperidinyl amides as CCR5 modulators using multivariate adaptive regression spline and Bayesian regularized genetic neural networks. QSAR Comb. Sci., 28: 946-958.
26. Aoyama, T and Ichikawa, H. 1992. Neural networks as nonlinear structure-activity relationship analyzers. Useful functions of the partial derivative method in multilayer neural networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32: 492-500.
27. Devillers, J, Pham-Delègue, MH, Decourtye, A, Budzinski, H, Cluzeau, S and Maurin, G. 2002. Structure-toxicity modeling of pesticides to honey bees. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 13: 641-648.
28. Devillers, J. 2004. Linear versus nonlinear QSAR modeling of the toxicity of phenol derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 15: 237-249.
29. Devillers, J. 2005. A new strategy for using supervised artificial neural networks in QSAR. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 16: 433-442.
30. Dearden, JC and Hewitt, M. 2010. QSAR modelling of bioconcentration factor using hydrophobicity, hydrogen bonding and topological descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 21: 671-680.
31. Gharagheizi, F and Sattari, M. 2009. Estimation of molecular diffusivity of pure chemicals in water: A quantitative structure-property relationship study. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 20: 267-285.
32. Yao, XJ, Panaye, A, Doucet, JP, Zhang, RS, Chen, HF, Liu, MC, Hu, ZD and Fan, BT. 2004. Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44: 1257-1266.
33. Yao, XJ, Panaye, A, Doucet, JP, Chen, HF, Zhang, RS, Fan, BT, Liu, MC and Hu, ZD. 2005. Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks. Anal. Chim. Acta, 535: 259-273.
34. Panaye, A, Fan, BT, Doucet, JP, Yao, XJ, Zhang, RS, Liu, MC and Hu, ZD. 2006. Quantitative structure-toxicity relationships (QSTRs): A comparative study of various non linear methods. General regression neural network, radial basis function neural network and support vector machine in predicting toxicity of nitro- and cyano- aromatics to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 17: 75-91.
35. Bigus, JP. 1996. Data Mining with Neural Networks, New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Doucet, JP, Barbault, F, Xia, HR, Panaye, A and Fan, BT. 2007. Non linear SVM approaches to QSPR/QSAR studies and drug design. Cur. Comput. Aided Drug Des., 3: 263-289.
37. Wang, Y, Zheng, M, Xiao, J, Lu, Y, Wang, F, Lu, J, Luo, X, Zhu, W, Jiang, H and Chen, K. 2010. Using support vector regression coupled with the genetic algorithm for predicting acute toxicity to the fathead minnow. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 21: 559-570.
38. Darnag, R, Schmitzer, A, Belmiloud, Y, Villemin, D, Jarid, A, Chait, A, Mazouz, E and Cherqaoui, D. 2010. Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of TIBO derivatives using support vector machines. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 21: 231-246.
39. Bagheri, M and Golbraikh, A. 2012. Rank-based ant system method for non-linear QSPR analysis: QSPR studies of the solubility parameter. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 23: 59-86.
40. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, New York: Springer, 1995
41. Chu, W, Keerthi, SS and Ong, CJ. 2004. Bayesian support vector regression using a unified loss function. IEEE Trans. Neural Net., 15: 29-44.
42. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and other Kernel-based Learning Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000
43. Devillers, J. 2004. Prediction of mammalian toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides from QSTR modeling. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 15: 501-510.
44. Xu, L, Ball, JW, Dixon, SL and Jurs, PC. 1994. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for toxicity of phenols using regression analysis and computational neural networks. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 13: 841-851.
45. Serra, JR, Jurs, PC and Kaiser, KLE. 2001. Linear regression and computational neural network prediction of Tetrahymena acute toxicity of aromatic compounds from molecular structure. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 14: 1535-1545.
46. Zhao, CY, Zhang, RS, Zhang, HX, Xue, CX, Liu, HX, Liu, MC, Hu, ZD and Fan, BT. 2005. QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 16: 349-367.
47. Tan, NX, Rao, HB, Li, ZR and Li, XY. 2009. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 20: 27-75.
48. Devillers, J, Doucet, JP, Panaye, A, Marchand-Geneste, N and Porcher, JM. 2009. "Structure-activity of a diverse set of androgen receptor ligands". In Endocrine Disruption Modeling, Edited by: Devillers, J. 335-355. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
49. Wogulis, M, Wheelock, CE, Kamita, SG, Hinton, AC, Whetstone, PA, Hammock, BD and Wilson, DK. 2006. Structural studies of a potent insect maturation inhibitor bound to the juvenile hormone esterase of Manduca sexta. Biochemistry, 43: 4045-4057.
50. J. Devillers and A.T. Balaban, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Dordrecht The Netherlands, 1999
51. Stanton, DT and Jurs, PC. 1990. Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationship studies. Anal. Chem., 62: 2323-2329.
52. Karelson, M. 2004. "Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR". In Computational Medicinal Chemistry for Drug Discovery, Edited by: Bultinck, P., Winter, H. de, Langenaeker, W. and Tollenaere, J.P. New York: Marcel Dekker.
53. Rayo, J, Muñoz, L, Rosell, G, Hammock, BD, Guerrero, A, Luque, FJ and Pouplana, R. 2010. Reactivity versus steric effects in fluorinated ketones as esterase inhibitors: A quantum mechanical and molecular dynamics study. J. Mol. Model., 16: 1753-1764.
54. Mackert, A, Hartfelder, K, Bitondi, MMG and Simões, ZLP. 2010. The juvenile hormone (JH) epoxide hydrolase gene in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) genome encodes a protein which has negligible participation in JH degradation. J. Insect. Physiol., 56: 1139-1146.