Androgen receptor binding affinity: A QSAR evaluation

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 265-291

  Todorov, M ^a   Mombelli, E ^b   Ait Aissa S ^b   Mekenyan, O ^a  

^a ASSEN ZLATAROV UNIVERSITY   (Bulgaria)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

Author keywords

Androgen binding; Hormonal toxicity; Molecular flexibility; Qsar; Strategic chemical selection

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR ORBITALS; MOLECULAR OXYGEN;

ANDROGEN BINDING; ANDROGEN RECEPTORS; BINDING AFFINITIES; HORMONAL TOXICITY; MOLECULAR FLEXIBILITY; MULTIPARAMETERS; QSAR; REACTIVITY PATTERN; RECEPTOR BINDING; STRATEGIC CHEMICAL SELECTION;

ELECTRIC BATTERIES;

RATTUS;

EID: 79957862130     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2011.569508     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. A.M. Matsumoto, Hormone therapy of male hypogonadism, Endocrin. Metab. Clin. 23 (1994), pp. 857-875.
2. J.D. Mangelsdorf, C. Thummel, M. Beato, P. Herrlich, G. Schutz, K. Umesono, B. Blumberg, P. Kastner, M. Mark, P. Chambon, and R.M. Evans, The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade, Cell 83 (1995), pp. 835-839.
3. E.L. Gray Jr, Xenoendocrine disrupters:Laboratory studies on male reproductive effects, Toxicol. Lett. 102-103 (1998), pp. 331-335.
4. P. Sohoni and J.P. Sumpter, Several environmental oestrogens are also anti-androgens, J. Endocrinol. 158 (1998), pp. 327-339.
5. S.M. Singh, S. Gauthier, and F. Labrie, Androgen receptor antagonists (antiandrogens): Structure-activity relationships, Curr. Med. Chem. 7 (2000), pp. 211-247.
6. C. Chang and C. Lin, Libsvm, a library for support vector machines, (2001) http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
7. G.S. Kapur, A. Ecker, and R. Meusinger, Establishing quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) of diesel samples by proton-NMR and multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis, Energy & Fuels 15 (2001), pp. 943-948.
8. C. Wan and P.B. Harrington, Self-configuring radial basis function neural networks for chemical pattern recognition, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999), pp. 1049-1056.
9. C.Y. Zhao, R.S. Zhang, H.X. Zhang, C.X. Xue, H.X. Liu, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 16 (2005), pp. 349-367.
10. C.X. Xue, R.S. Zhang, H.X. Liu, X.J. Yao, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, QSAR models for the prediction of binding affinities to human serum albumin using the heuristic method and a support vector machine, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 1693-1700
11. M. Mizutani, N. Tomioka, and A. Itai, Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand, J. Mol. Biol. 243 (1994), pp. 310-326.
12. P. Schmieder, A. Aptula, E. Routledge, J. Sumpter, and O. Mekenyan, Estrogenicity of alkylphenolic compounds: A 3-D structure activity evaluation of gene activation, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 (2000), pp. 1727-1740.
13. D.A. Loughney and C.F. Schwender, A comparison of progestin and androgen receptor binding using the CoMFA technique, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 6 (1992), pp. 569-581.
14. C.L. Waller, B.W. Jumaa, L.E. Gray, and R.K. William, Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships for androgen receptor ligands, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 137 (1996), pp. 219-227.
15. H. Hong, H. Fang, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, D.M. Sheehan, and W. Tong, Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003), pp. 373-388.
16. J.M. Ivanov, O.G. Mekenyan, S.P. Bradbury, and G. Schüürmann, A kinetic analysis of the conformational flexibility of steroids, Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel. 17 (1998), pp. 437-449.
17. T.E. Wiese and S.C. Brooks, Molecular modeling of steroidal estrogens: Novel conformations and their role in biological activity, J. Steroid Biochem. 50 (1994), pp. 61-73.
18. S. Bradbury, V. Kamenska, P. Schmieder, G. Ankley, and O. Mekenyan, A Computationallybased identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands: Part I. Predicting hERα binding affinity, Toxicol. Sci. 58 (2000), pp. 253-269.
19. J.M. Ivanov, S.H Karabunarliev, and O.G. Mekenyan, 3DGEN: A system for an Exhaustive 3D Molecular Design, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34 (1994), pp. 234-243.
20. O.G. Mekenyan, V. Kamenska, P.K. Schmieder, G.T Ankley, and S.P. Bradbury, A computationally-based identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands; Part II. Evaluation of a hERα binding affinity model, Toxicol. Sci. 58 (2000), pp. 270-281.
21. R. Serafimova, J. Walker, and O. Mekenyan, Androgen receptor binding affinity of pesticide"Active" formulation ingredients: QSAR evaluation by COREPA method, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13 (2002), pp. 127-134.
22. R. Serafimova, M. Todorov, D. Nedelcheva, T. Pavlov, Y. Akahori, M. Nakai, and O. Mekenyan, QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 389-421.
23. R. Serafimova, M. Todorov, T. Pavlov, S. Kotov, E. Jacob, A. Aptula, and O. Mekenyan, Identification of the structural requirements for mutagencitiy, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals: II. General Ames mutagenicity model, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2006), pp. 662-676.
24. O. Mekenyan, R. Serafimova, M. Todorov, S. Stoeva, A. Aptula, E. Jacob, and R. Finking, Identification of the structural requirements for chromosomal aberration, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2007), pp. 1927-1941.
25. P. Schmieder, O. Mekenyan, S. Bradbury, and G. Veith, QSAR prioritization of chemical inventories for endocrine disruptor testing, Pure Appl. Chem. 75 (2003), pp. 2389-2396.
26. H. Fang, W. Tong, W.S. Branham, C.L. Moland, S.L. Dial, H. Hong, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, W. Owens, and D.M. Sheehan, Study of 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp. 1338-1358.
27. J. Katzenellenbogen, R. Muthyala, and B. Katzenellenbogen, Interactions of exogenous endocrine active substances with nuclear receptors, Pure Appl. Chem. 75 (2003), pp. 1797-1817.
28. G. Anstead, K. Carlson, and J. Katzenellenbogen, The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site, Steroids 62 (1997), pp. 268-303.
29. EINECS (European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances). Available at http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/.
30. O. Mekenyan, J. Ivanov, S. Karabunarliev, S. Bradbury, G. Ankley, and W. Karcher, A computationally-based hazard identification algorithm that incorporates ligand flexibility: 1. Identification of potential androgen receptor ligands, Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997), pp. 3702-3711.
31. T. Pavlov, M. Todorov, R. Serafimova, H. Aladjov, and O. Mekenyan, conformational coverage by genetic algorithm: Saturation of conformational space, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 851-863.
32. J. Steward, MOPAC: A semiempirical molecular orbital program, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 4 (1990), pp. 1-105.
33. J. Steward, MOPAC 93 (1993); Fujitsu Limited, Chiba, Japan; Steward Computational Chemistry, 15210 Paddington Circle, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
34. N. Nikolov, V. Grancharov, G. Stoyanova, T. Pavlov, and O. Mekenyan, Representation of chemical information in OASIS centralized 3D database for existing chemicals, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46 (2006), pp. 2537-2551.
35. O. Mekenyan, N. Nikolova, and P. Schmieder, Dynamic 3D QSAR techniques: Applications in toxicology, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM. 622 (2003), pp. 147-165.
36. M. Connoly, Analytical molecular surface calculation, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 16 (1983), pp. 548-558.
37. D.T. Stanton and P.C. Jurs, Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationship studies, Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, US), 62 (1990), pp. 2323-2329.
38. O. Mekenyan, N. Nikolova, P. Schmieder, and G. Veith, COREPA-M: A multi-dimensional formulation of COREPA, QSAR Comb. Sci. 23 (2004), pp. 5-18.
39. S. Dimitrov, G. Dimitrova, T. Pavlov, N. Dimitrova, G. Patlewicz, J. Niemela, and O. Mekenyan, A stepwise approach for defining the applicability domain of SAR and models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 839-849.
40. H. Aladjov, M. Todorov, P. Schmieder, R. Serafimova, O. Mekenyan, and G. Veith, Strategic selection of chemicals for testing: Part I. Functionalities and performance of basic selection methods, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 159-183.
41. A. Pillon, A.M. Boussioux, A. Escande, S. Aït-Aïssa, E. Gomez, H. Fenet, M. Ruff, D. Moras, F. Vignon, M.J. Duchesne, C. Casellas, J.C. Nicholas, and P. Balaguer, Binding of estrogenic compounds to recombinant estrogen receptor-α:application to environmental analysis, Environ. Health Pespect. 113 (2005), pp. 278-284.
42. V.S. Wilson, K. Bobseine, C.R. Lambright, and L.E. Gray, A novel cell line, MDA-kb2, that stably expresses an androgen- and glucocorticoid-responsive reporter for the detection of hormone receptor agonists and antagonists, Toxicol. Sci. 66 (2002), pp. 69-81.
43. S. Aït-Aïssa, S. Laskowski, N. Laville, J.-M. Porcher, and F. Brion, Anti-androgenic activities of environmental pesticides in the MDA-kb2 reporter cell line, Toxicol. In Vitro, 24 (2010), pp. 1979-1985.
44. Current status of test methods for detecting endocrine disruptors: In vitro androgen receptor binding assays; NIH publication No. 03-4506. Available at http://www.epa.gov/endo/pubs/ar_binding_backgroundreviewdocument.pdf
45. N. Araki, K. Ohno, M. Nakai, M. Takeyoshi, and M. Iida, Screening for androgen receptor activities in 253 industrial chemicals by in vitro reporter gene assays using AR-EcoScreenTM cells, Toxicol. in Vitro 19 (2005), pp. 831-842.
46. C. Wong, W.R. Kelce, M. Sar, and E.M. Wilson, Androgen receptor antagonist versus agonist activities of the fungicide vinclozolin relative to hydroxyflutamide, J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995), pp. 19998-20003.
47. H. Tamura, H. Yoshikawa, K. Gaido, S.M. Ross, R.K. DeLisle, W.J. Welsh, and A.M. Richard, Interaction of organophosphate pesticides and related compounds with the androgen receptor, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2002), pp. 545-552