Structure-activity modeling of a diverse set of androgen receptor ligands

Endocrine Disruption Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 335-355

  Devillers, James ^a   Doucet, Jean Pierre ^b   Panaye, Annick ^b   Marchand Geneste, Nathalie ^c   Porcher, Jean Marc ^d  

^a Centre de Traitement de l Information Scientifique (CTIS)   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^d INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

Author keywords

Androgen receptor; Binding assays; Endocrine disruptors; Linear and nonlinear methods; Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860299954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420076363     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. J. Lintelmann, A. Katayama, N. Kurihara, L. Shore, and A. Wenzel, Endocrine disruptors in the environment, Pure Appl. Chem. 75 (2003), pp. 631-681.
2. L.E. Gray, J. Ostby, V. Wilson, C. Lambright, K. Bobseine, P. Hartig, A. Hotchkiss, C. Wolf, J. Furr, M. Price, L. Parks, R.L. Cooper, T.E. Stoker, S.C. Laws, S.J. Degitz, K.M. Jensen, M.D. Kahl, J.J. Korte, E.A. Makynen, J.E. Tietge, and G.T. Ankley, Xenoendocrine disrupters-tiered screening and testing. Filling key data gaps, Toxicology 181/182 (2002), pp. 371-382.
3. W.S. Baldwin, D.L. Milam, and G.A. LeBlanc, Physiological and biochemical perturbations in Daphnia magna following exposure to the model environmental estrogen diethylstilbestrol, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14 (1995), pp. 945-952.
4. E.J. Routledge and J.P. Sumpter, Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996), pp. 241-248.
5. J.E. Harries, D.A. Sheahan, S. Jobling, P. Matthiessen, P. Neall, J.P. Sumpter, T. Tylor, and N. Zaman, Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detected by measurement of vitellogenesis in caged male trout, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 534-542.
6. J. Koistinen, M. Soimasuo, K. Tukia, A. Oikari, A. Blankenship, and J.P. Giesy, Induction of EROD activity in HEPA-1 mouse hepatoma cells and estrogenicity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells by extracts of pulp mill effluents, sludge, and sediment exposed to effluents, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 1499-1507.
7. S.H. Safe and K. Gaido, Phytoestrogens and anthropogenic estrogenic compounds, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 119-126.
8. Y. Allen, A.P. Scott, P. Matthiessen, S. Haworth, J.E. Thain, and S. Feist, Survey of estrogenic activity in United Kingdom estuarine and coastal waters and its effects on gonadal development of the flounder Platichthys flesus, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18 (1999), pp. 1791-1800.
9. A.K. Hotchkiss, J. Furr, E.A. Makynen, G.T. Ankley, and L.E. Gray, In utero exposure to the environmental androgen trenbolone masculinizes female Sprague-Dawley rats, Toxicol. Lett. 174 (2007), pp. 31-41.
10. L.G. Parks, C.S. Lambright, E.F. Orlando, L.J. Guillette, G.T. Ankley, and L.E. Gray, Masculinization of female mosquitofish in Kraft mill effluent-contaminated Fenholloway River water is associated with androgen receptor agonist activity, Toxicol. Sci. 62 (2001), pp. 257-267.
11. R.J. Ellis, M.R. van den Heuvel, E. Bandelj, M.A. Smith, L.H. McCarthy, T.R. Stuthridge, and D.R. Dietrich, In vivo and in vitro assessment of the androgenic potential of a pulp and paper mill effluent, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 (2003), pp. 1448-1456.
12. E.F. Orlando, D.E. Bass, L.M. Caltabiano, W.P. Davis, L.E. Gray, and L.J. Guillette, Altered development and reproduction in mosquitofish exposed to pulp and paper mill effluent in the Fenholloway River, Florida, USA, Aquat. Toxicol. 84 (2007), pp. 399-405.
13. R. Urbatzka, A. van Cauwenberge, S. Maggioni, L. Vigano, A. Mandich, E. Benfenati, I. Lutz, and W. Kloas, Androgenic and antiandrogenic activities in water and sediment samples from the River Lambro, Italy, detected by yeast androgen screen and chemical analyses, Chemosphere 67 (2007), pp. 1080-1087.
14. R. Kizu, K. Okamura, A. Toriba, A. Mizokami, K.L. Burnstein, C.M. Klinge, and K. Hayakawa, Antiandrogenic activities of diesel exhaust particle extracts in PC3/AR human prostate carcinoma cells, Toxicol. Sci. 76 (2003), pp. 299-309.
15. C. Li, S. Taneda, A.K. Suzuki, C. Furuta, G. Watanabe, and K. Taya, Estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities of 4-nitrophenol in diesel exhaust particles, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 217 (2006), pp. 1-6.
16. T. Suzuki, S. Kitamura, R. Khota, K. Sugihara, N. Fujimoto, and S. Ohta, Estrogenic and antiandrogenic activities of 17 benzophenone derivatives used as UV stabilizers and sunscreens, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 203 (2005), pp. 9-17.
17. W.R. Kelce and L.E. Gray, Endocrine disruptors: Effects on sex steroid hormone receptors and sex development, in Drug Toxicity in Embryonic Development II, R.J. Kavlock and G.P. Daston, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 435-474.
18. S.C. Maness, D.P. McDonnell, and K.W. Gaido, Inhibition of androgen receptor-dependent transcriptional activity by DDT isomers and methoxychlor in HepG2 human hepatoma cells, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 151 (1998), pp. 135-142.
19. C. Lambright, J. Ostby, K. Bobseine, V. Wilson, A.K. Hotchkiss, P.C. Mann, and L.E. Gray, Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of linuron: An antiandrogenic herbicide that produces reproductive malformations in male rats, Toxicol. Sci. 56 (2000), pp. 389-399.
20. A.M. Vinggaard, C. Nellemann, M. Dalgaard, E.B. Jorgensen, and H.R. Andersen, Antiandrogenic effects in vitro and in vivo of the fungicide prochloraz, Toxicol. Sci. 69 (2002), pp. 344-353.
21. S. Kitamura, T. Suzuki, S. Ohta, and N. Fujimoto, Antiandrogenic activity and metabolism of the organophosphorus pesticide fenthion and related compounds, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 503-508.
22. P. Roy, H. Salminen, P. Koskimies, J. Simola, A. Smeds, P. Saukko, and I.T. Huhtaniemi, Screening of some anti-androgenic endocrine disruptors using a recombinant cell-based in vitro bioassay, J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol. 88 (2004), pp. 157-166.
23. A. Freyberger and H.J. Ahr, Development and standardization of a simple binding assay for the detection of compounds with affinity for the androgen receptor, Toxicology 195 (2004), pp. 113-126.
24. N. Araki, K. Ohno, M. Nakai, M. Takeyoshi, and M. Iida, Screening for androgen receptor activities in 253 industrial chemicals by in vitro reporter gene assays using AR-EcoScreen™ cells, Toxicol. In Vitro 19 (2005), pp. 831-842.
25. J. Devillers, N. Marchand-Geneste, A. Carpy, and J.M. Porcher, SAR and QSAR modeling of endocrine disruptors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 17 (2006), pp. 393-412.
26. C.L. Waller, B.W. Juma, L.E. Gray, and W.R. Kelce, Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships for androgen receptor ligands, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 137 (1996), pp. 219-227.
27. D.A. Loughney and C.F. Schwender, A comparison of progestin and androgen receptor binding using the CoMFA technique, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 6 (1992), pp. 569-581.
28. H. Hong, H. Fang, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, D.M. Sheehan, and W. Tong, Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003), pp. 373-388.
29. H. Fang, W. Tong, W.S. Branham, C.L. Moland, S.L. Dial, H. Hong, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, W. Owens, and D.M. Sheehan, Study of 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp. 1338-1358.
30. C.Y. Zhao, R.S. Zhang, H.X. Zhang, C.X. Xue, H.X. Liu, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan. QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 16 (2005), pp. 349-367.
31. J.P. Bigus, Data Mining with Neural Networks, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.
32. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, London, 2000.
33. A.R. Katritzky, R. Petrukhin, S. Perumal, M. Karelson, I. Prakash, and N. Desai, A QSPR study of sweetness potency using the CODESSA program, Croat. Chem. Acta 75 (2002), pp. 475-502.
34. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman & Hall, London, 1984.
35. R.J. Lewis, An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, Annual Meeting of the Society for Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California, 2000.
36. J. Devillers, Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design, Academic Press, London, 1996.
37. R. Leardi, Nature-Inspired Methods in Chemometrics: Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
38. G. Golub and W. Kahan, Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix, J. SIAM Numer. Anal. Ser. B 3 (1965), pp. 205-224.
39. J. Devillers, A general QSAR model for predicting the acute toxicity of pesticides to Lepomis macrochirus, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 11 (2001), pp. 397-417.
40. J. Devillers, M.H. Pham-Delègue, A. Decourtye, H. Budzinski, S. Cluzeau, and G. Maurin, Structure-toxicity modeling of pesticides to honey bees, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13 (2002), pp. 641-648.
41. J. Devillers, M.H. Pham-Delegue, A. Decourtye, H. Budzinski, S. Cluzeau, and G. Maurin, Modeling the acute toxicity of pesticides to Apis mellifera, Bull. Insect. 56 (2003) pp. 103-109.
42. J. Devillers, Prediction of toxicity of organophosphorus insecticides against the midge, Chironomus riparius, via a QSAR neural network model integrating environmental variables, Toxicol. Methods 10 (2000), pp. 69-79.
43. J. Devillers, QSAR model for predicting the acute toxicity of pesticides to gammarids, in Nature-Inspired Methods in Chemometrics: Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks, R. Leardi, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003, pp. 323-339.
44. J. Devillers, Linear versus nonlinear QSAR modeling of the toxicity of phenol derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 15 (2004), pp. 237-249.
45. J. Devillers, Strengths and weaknesses of the backpropagation neural network in QSAR and QSPR studies, in Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design, J. Devillers, ed., Academic Press, London, 1996, pp. 1-46.
46. K. Elkhou, A. I. Afifi, M. Kabbaj, D. Villemin, and D. Cherqaoui, QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands using neural networks, ACH Models in Chemistry 137 (2000), pp. 633-642.
47. R.C. Eberhart and R.W. Dobbins, Neural Network PC Tools. A Practical Guide, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1990.
48. X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, R.S. Zhang, H.F. Chen, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 1257-1266.
49. X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, H.F. Chen, R.S. Zhang, B.T. Fan, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hu, Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005), pp. 259-273.
50. A. Panaye, B.T. Fan, J.P. Doucet, X.J. Yao, R.S. Zhang, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hu, Quantitative structure-toxicity relationships (QSTRs): A comparative study of various nonlinear methods. General regression neural network, radial basis function neural network and support vector machine in predicting toxicity of nitro-and cyano-aromatics to Tetrahymena pyriformis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 17 (2006), pp. 75-91.
51. K.L.E. Kaiser and S.P. Niculescu, On the PNN modeling of estrogen receptor binding data for carboxylic acid esters and organochlorine compounds, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 36 (2001), pp. 619-630.
52. K.L.E. Kaiser and S.P. Niculescu, Using probabilistic neural networks to model the toxicity of chemicals to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas): A study based on 865 compounds, Chemosphere 38 (1999), pp. 3237-3245.
53. S.P. Niculescu, K.L.E. Kaiser, and T.W. Schultz, Modeling the toxicity of chemicals to Tetrahymena pyriformis using molecular fragment descriptors and probabilistic neural networks, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39 (2000), pp. 289-298.
54. K.L.E. Kaiser, S.P. Niculescu, and T.W. Schultz, Probabilistic neural network modeling for the toxicity of chemicals to Tetrahymena pyriformis with molecular fragment descriptors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13 (2002), pp. 57-67.
55. K.L.E. Kaiser and S.P. Niculescu, Modeling acute toxicity of chemicals to Daphnia magna: A probabilistic neural network approach, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20 (2001), pp. 420-431.
56. P.D. Wasserman, Advanced Methods in Neural Computing, van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993.
57. J. Devillers, QSAR modeling of large heterogeneous sets of molecules, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 12 (2001), pp. 515-528.
58. N. Baurin, J.C. Mozziconacci, E. Arnoult, P. Chavatte, C. Marot, and L. Morin-Allory, 2D QSAR consensus prediction for high-throughput virtual screening. An application to COX-2 inhibition modeling and screening of the NCI database, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 276-285.
59. A. Asikainen, M. Kolehmainen, J. Ruuskanen, and K. Tuppurainen, Structure-based classification of active and inactive estrogenic compounds by decision tree, LVQ and kNN methods, Chemosphere 62 (2006) pp. 659-673.
60. T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Map, Springer, Berlin, 1995.
61. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1995.
62. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support vector networks, Machine Learning 20 (1995), pp. 273-297.
63. E. Byvatov, U. Fechner, J. Sadowski, and G. Schneider, Comparison of support vector machine and artificial neural network systems for drug/nondrug classification, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003), pp. 1882-1889.
64. V.V. Zernov, K.V. Balakin, A.A. Ivaschenko, N.P. Savchuk, and I.V. Pletnev, Drug discovery using support vector machines. The case studies of drug-likeness, agrochemical-likeness, and enzyme inhibition predictions, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003), pp. 2048-2056.
65. P. Mahé, L. Ralaivola, V. Stoven, and J.P. Vert, The pharmacophore kernel for virtual screening with support vector machines, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46 (2006), pp. 2003-2014.
66. Q. Li, A. Bender, J. Pei, and L. Lai, A large descriptor set and a probabilistic kernelbased classifier significantly improve druglikeness classification, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 1776-1786.
67. J. Huang, G. Ma, I. Muhammad, and Y. Cheng, Identifying P-glycoprotein substrates using a support vector machine optimized by a particle swarm, J. Chem. Inf. Mod. 47 (2007), pp. 1638-1647.
68. S. Yuan, M. Xiao, G. Zheng, M. Tian, and X. Lu, Quantitative structure-property relationship studies on electrochemical degradation of substituted phenols using a support vector machine, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 17 (2006), pp. 473-481.
69. J.P. Doucet, F. Barbault, H.R. Xia, A. Panaye, and B.T. Fan, Nonlinear SVM approaches to QSPR/QSAR studies and Drug Design, Cur. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 3 (2007), pp. 263-289.
70. M. Aizerman, E. Braverman, and L. Rozonoer, Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning, Autom. Remote Control 25 (1964), pp. 821-837.
71. W.S. Noble, What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotechnol. 24 (2006), pp. 1565-1567.
72. E. Dimitriadou, K. Hornik, F. Leisch, D. Meyer, and A. Weingessel, e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, TU Wien. R package version 1.5-16.
73. J. Devillers and A.T. Balaban, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, The Netherlands, 1999.